Re: GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 06 Jul 2007 11:47:26 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> 
> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?

Yes, "version 3 or later" would be fine.

Regards,
Mikhael.



Re: GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread Olivier Chapuis

Dominik Vogt a écrit :

Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?

The license:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt

More information and discussion:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html



No objection, Olivier



Re: GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?
> 
> The license:
> 
>   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt
> 
> More information and discussion:
> 
>   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

Agree.

-- 
Dan Espen   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CVS renato: Updated my contibution list

2007-07-06 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato  07/07/06 07:24:53

Modified files:
.  : AUTHORS 

Log message:
Updated my contibution list




Re: GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread seventh guardian

On 7/6/07, Scott Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Dominik,

> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?

I'm happy for any of my contributions to be licensed using GPLv3.
(not that permission is required with the "v2 or any later version"
clause in the existing GPLv2 licence.)


Me too.


I'd like to see FVWM migrate to GPLv3 soon, allowing a reasonable time
(~1 month?) for anyone to voice objections about relicensing their own
contributions. (Even though legally we don't need to, it would be
polite.)


I hereby grant the fvwm comitee the right to upgrade the license
version as they see fit, as long as it is remains a GPL license.

By the way, I guess I should update my contribution listing..

Cheers,
 Renato Caldas



Re: GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread Scott Smedley
Hi Dominik,

> Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?

I'm happy for any of my contributions to be licensed using GPLv3.
(not that permission is required with the "v2 or any later version"
clause in the existing GPLv2 licence.)

I'd like to see FVWM migrate to GPLv3 soon, allowing a reasonable time
(~1 month?) for anyone to voice objections about relicensing their own
contributions. (Even though legally we don't need to, it would be
polite.)

I suggest you forward your "GPLv3?" post to the fvwm mailing list as well.

Scott. :)



GPLv3?

2007-07-06 Thread Dominik Vogt
Should we upgrade to the GPLv3?

The license:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt

More information and discussion:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


CVS domivogt: Updated NEWS.

2007-07-06 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt07/07/06 02:12:46

Modified files:
.  : NEWS 

Log message:
Updated NEWS.