Re: FVWM: fvwm development
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:28:16AM -0800, Jason Timrod wrote: Hi, Is it true that fvwm has no maintainer now? if so, is fvwm still being No. For years, FVWN has had no *one* maintainer *by design*. Any one with a commit bit is effectively able to commit back. -- Thomas Adam
Re: FVWM: fvwm development
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:06:36 +0100 Adam Sjøgren wrote: I think it would be much more accurate to call FVWM mature. An even better word is useful (unlike many linux products under frenetic active development by folks who believe change is always good no matter how stupid it is :-).
