Re: FVWM Patch for Interaction problem with Java 7

[Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)]

 I'm happy to commit, providing I understand what it was for and why I 
 suggested the change; it was almost a year ago, after all.

Yeah, I am pulling this topic out of cold storage.  Sorry about that.  Besides 
the link that I just sent out, the other key piece of the conversation is 
probably this email:

http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@lists.math.uh.edu/msg15641.html

It was a pretty short e-mail chain; I suggested just commenting out/deleting a 
chunk of code (which is understandably less than ideal), and based on feedback 
I converted the patch to a bug opt.  The third iteration is the patch involving 
FP_IS_LENIENT that you (Thomas) suggested.

Let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Re: FVWM Patch for Interaction problem with Java 7

[Thomas Adam]

On 4 February 2013 22:19, Schaaf, Jonathan P (GE Healthcare)
jonathan.p.sch...@ge.com wrote:
 Let me know what you think.

I've committed a fix to CVS.  Please try that (branch-2_6 in CVS).

-- Thomas Adam