On 13 October 2014 22:53, Dan Espen <des...@verizon.net> wrote: > > I don't see the sense in removing xpm, svg, bmp, etc. support. > How many lines of code does that save?
I've often wondered - but also i dont care what format my files are in as long as they just work. that said, i dont like this change much either because its too disuptive to other people. can we not do this? > I can imagine it saves some amount of non-resident memory, > but if you don't have xpms, libxpm should not be using > any significant real memory. > > Otherwise, it just causes issues for users. agree. > But my real issue is moving the development source > to another location and not documenting anything about it. > That, and changing the name of fvwm to something else. > > If you want to fork, say so. i dont know how official it is but i consider mvwm a fork - and why not? what difference is it making either way? i know that if i want to use mvwm i have to update my config - and that's ok - is it not? Michael
