On 20 October 2014 10:19, Michael Treibton <mtreib...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 15 October 2014 20:15, Michael Treibton <mtreib...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 13 October 2014 22:53, Dan Espen <des...@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>> I don't see the sense in removing xpm, svg, bmp, etc. support. >>> How many lines of code does that save? >> >> I've often wondered - but also i dont care what format my files are in >> as long as they just work. that said, i dont like this change much >> either because its too disuptive to other people. >> >> can we not do this? > > so can we get an official answer? i know Thomas is active because i > see code changes - so is this a fork proper or not?
i suppose we all have our answer. Thanks for the conversation, i look forward to the time when mvwm merges with fvwm but even converting my config over is a lot of effort now. annoyed, Michael
