[fw-general] Flexibel content within zend framework
After reading tons of articles and tuts, im really stuck on howto setup my website with zend framework. The general idea is to create a lightweight cms to handle the rather static parts of the site. The dynamic part is all about job postings. The problem comes that the index page has a couple of block dynamic content regarding jobs and some of the static pages will have a small list of job postings to. But im really stuck how to handle this all. Thought about using acton stack or maybe the action view helper. But this all means you preset it in the code. Would like to handle it dynamically true an admin interface in a content management system. Really like to get some input about how to handle this with the zend framework. Met vriendelijke groet, The College Healthcare Tom Staals Tel. nr. 038 - 455 62 62 Fax nr. 038 - 455 62 72 e-mail tsta...@collegehealthcare.nl<mailto:tsta...@collegehealthcare.nl> Wilt u meer over ons weten? www.collegehealthcare.nl<http://www.collegehealthcare.nl/> [cid:image001.gif@01CABEB5.AAC33BC0] <>
[fw-general] Flexibel content within zend framework
After reading tons of articles and tuts, im really stuck on howto setup my website with zend framework. The general idea is to create a lightweight cms to handle the rather static parts of the site. The dynamic part is all about job postings. The problem comes that the index page has a couple of block dynamic content regarding jobs and some of the static pages will have a small list of job postings to. But im really stuck how to handle this all. Thought about using acton stack or maybe the action view helper. But this all means you preset it in the code. Would like to handle it dynamically true an admin interface in a content management system. Really like to get some input about how to handle this with the zend framework. Met vriendelijke groet, The College Healthcare Tom Staals Tel. nr. 038 - 455 62 62 Fax nr. 038 - 455 62 72 e-mail tsta...@collegehealthcare.nl<mailto:tsta...@collegehealthcare.nl> Wilt u meer over ons weten? www.collegehealthcare.nl<http://www.collegehealthcare.nl/> [cid:image001.gif@01CABEB5.AAC33BC0] <>
Re: [fw-general] Proposed backward-incompatible changes to Zend_Validate_* classes
Hi Bryce, Im a little concerned regarding your decision to validate an empty string. This should not be a default behaviour of a validator class. Bill Karwin new Zend_Filter_input allready deals with this by allowing to set an option to allow a emptry string when such a behaviour is wanted. allowEmpty = true If you make this a default it will only become harder to check for valid results in my opinion. I also hope that the changes will not be that hard to refactor in my source. Becuase im allready heavily depended on the Zend_Validate classes. Currently all implemented trough the new Zend_Filter_Input written by Bill which in my opinion is a great solution. I do agree however that the messages should not be hardcoded but left as some short of an option. Im currently using an extra array called messages with my own preffed message in it. When an invalid field is detected. I use the field index to get the right message from my own message array. Whatever is decided on I really hope that a stable situation for Filter and Validate will come soon. As in my opinion a good solution for filtering and validating user input is maybe the most important part of any good framework. Bryce Lohr wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've proposed some changes to Zend_Validate_* classes that would not be > backward > compatible. Specifically, I had proposed to change the default behavior > all the > standard validators to consider the empty string a valid value. > > Now, I've been operating under the assumption that hardly anyone is using > the > current Zend_Validate_* classes, due to the fact that it's a hassle to > validate > a lot of data at once. I figured that if few people were actually using > these, > then the cost of making this backward-incompatible change was low. The > benefit > of the change is that it would provide a lot of flexibility in the > proposed > Zend_Validate_Builder class. > > I may be way off base with my assumption here, so I'd like to find out how > many > of you are actually using the current Zend_Validate_* classes. Obviously, > if a > lot of people are, in fact, using them, then it's not feasible to make > this > proposed change. > > Regards, > Bryce Lohr > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Proposed-backward-incompatible-changes-to-Zend_Validate_*-classes-tf3769731s16154.html#a10665724 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] How to create a new issue?
You have to request posting permissions by email use the following link to mail for permission http://www.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=9600436&i=0 Be sure to mention your account name cheers Tom Niko Sams wrote: > > Hello, > > This may sound stupid, but I can't create a new issue in the > Zend Framework Issue Tracker. > > someone else had this problem too: > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Issue+Tracker+Etiquette?focusedCommentId=19252#comment-19252 > > I have registered and logged in successfully, but I can't find the > "Create New Issue" link. > > this doesn't work either: > http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa > > > please help! > > niko > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-new-issue--tf3446224s16154.html#a9610615 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
