Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread dc

When you partition a hard drive you lose some of the space to the
drivers that the system needs to install. Your back-up partition
should be several gigs larger that your system to allow for the
drivers and to allow for more files you might add in the future. Try
re-partioning yuor 259 GB drive into something like 59/200.

On Nov 4, 7:56 pm, Wilton Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

         I bought a 259GB external disk to use for backing up my internal 80GB 
  
 HD on my eMac, which is using OS 10.5.5. One of my friends on the  
 email circuit recommended that I divide the disk into two partitions,  
 one the same size as my internal HD ( 80GB ) and the other what was  
 left. They said I should connect the larger one to the Time Machine so  
 it will be constantly up to date. I should backup the smaller one  
 every month or so to bring it up to date. Imagine my surprise today  
 when I switched to the smaller backup partition and got a message that  
 I needed 42.4 GB and I only had 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.
 Any suggestions?
 Thanks

 Wilton
 Wilton Shaw
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Bruce Johnson


On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

 They said I should connect the larger one to the Time Machine so
 it will be constantly up to date. I should backup the smaller one
 every month or so to bring it up to date. Imagine my surprise today
 when I switched to the smaller backup partition and got a message that
 I needed 42.4 GB and I only had 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.

I'm guessing that whatever program you're using to back up the entire  
disk to the smaller partition is not erasing the old backup first, and  
so is trying to cram another backup of your hard drive into the space


--
Bruce Johnson

No matter where you go, there you are, B. Banzai


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Charles Davis

Hi Wilton;
The problem was that you made the smaller partition as large as the  
'used' space on the 80G internal HD --- You forgot about things  
'growing' over time. IF you had made the partition 80GB to start  
with, you would have been O.K.

Chuck D.


On Nov 4, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

 Hello,

   I bought a 259GB external disk to use for backing up my internal  
 80GB HD on my eMac, which is using OS 10.5.5. One of my friends on  
 the email circuit recommended that I divide the disk into two  
 partitions, one the same size as my internal HD ( 80GB ) and the  
 other what was left. They said I should connect the larger one to  
 the Time Machine so it will be constantly up to date. I should  
 backup the smaller one every month or so to bring it up to date.  
 Imagine my surprise today when I switched to the smaller backup  
 partition and got a message that I needed 42.4 GB and I only had  
 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.
 Any suggestions?
 Thanks

 Wilton
 Wilton Shaw
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Wilton Shaw

On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:14 AM, Charles Davis wrote:


 Hi Wilton;
 The problem was that you made the smaller partition as large as the
 'used' space on the 80G internal HD --- You forgot about things
 'growing' over time. IF you had made the partition 80GB to start
 with, you would have been O.K.

 Chuck D.


 On Nov 4, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

 Hello,

  I bought a 259GB external disk to use for backing up my internal
 80GB HD on my eMac, which is using OS 10.5.5. One of my friends on
 the email circuit recommended that I divide the disk into two
 partitions, one the same size as my internal HD ( 80GB ) and the
 other what was left. They said I should connect the larger one to
 the Time Machine so it will be constantly up to date. I should
 backup the smaller one every month or so to bring it up to date.
 Imagine my surprise today when I switched to the smaller backup
 partition and got a message that I needed 42.4 GB and I only had
 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.
 Any suggestions?
 Thanks

 Wilton
 Wilton Shaw
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  I made the smaller portion a full 80 GB. The used area is 38.53 GB  
 and the free area is 41.47 GB, which adds up to 80 GB. The message  
 I got said I needed 42.4 so the Time Machine wouldn't work. I think  
 41.47 GB is plenty of space to make a few upgrades.

Wilton





 

Wilton Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Wilton Shaw

On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:



 On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

 They said I should connect the larger one to the Time Machine so
 it will be constantly up to date. I should backup the smaller one
 every month or so to bring it up to date. Imagine my surprise today
 when I switched to the smaller backup partition and got a message  
 that
 I needed 42.4 GB and I only had 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.

 I'm guessing that whatever program you're using to back up the entire
 disk to the smaller partition is not erasing the old backup first, and
 so is trying to cram another backup of your hard drive into the space


 --
 Bruce Johnson

 No matter where you go, there you are, B. Banzai

   What you say sounds reasonable. I simple tried using the Time  
 Machine to backup the smaller partition. I assumed the time machine  
 simply made whatever small changes were necessary rather than  
 replace everything.

Wilton

 

Wilton Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Bruce Johnson


On Nov 5, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

 I made the smaller portion a full 80 GB. The used area is 38.53 GB
 and the free area is 41.47 GB, which adds up to 80 GB. The message
 I got said I needed 42.4 so the Time Machine wouldn't work. I think
 41.47 GB is plenty of space to make a few upgrades.


Why do you have time machine set on the smaller volume?


The scheme is:

Large drive:

80G partition: bootable backup partition, regularly clone system drive  
here, using SuperDuper or CCC.

179G partition: Use for Time machine.

Time Machine stores an ongoing incremental backup of your stuff,  
including things you deleted, so you can always restore to a point in  
time anywhere between the initial backup and the last backup.

This means it will require a larger drive (depending on how much file  
churn you have on your system) a MUCH larger drive than the volume  
you're backing up.

If the 179G partition is complaining it's out of space, then you need  
a larger hard drive, or you need to reconsider using Time Machine.

If your system is one where you routinely work on a bunch of large  
projects that you move to your computer and then delete, making room  
for the next large project, Time Machine is going to require a very  
large volume, or Time Machine isn't actually a good solution for you.

You can exclude folders in Time Machine's prefs, so if you constantly  
churn large work files on and off your disk that are adequately backed  
up on other media (such as video raw footage and final DVD's) you can  
store that material in a folder you exclude from Time Machine.

I exclude my Mail folders form TM because I have an IMAP mail  
service...getting all my mail back is a simple matter of setting up  
the account. So I don't back it up, which eliminates a huge area of  
file churn that would rapidly eat away at Time Machine's space.

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Wilton Shaw

On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:23 AM, dc wrote:


 When you partition a hard drive you lose some of the space to the
 drivers that the system needs to install. Your back-up partition
 should be several gigs larger that your system to allow for the
 drivers and to allow for more files you might add in the future. Try
 re-partioning yuor 259 GB drive into something like 59/200.

 On Nov 4, 7:56 pm, Wilton Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 I bought a 259GB external disk to use for backing up my  
 internal 80GB
 HD on my eMac, which is using OS 10.5.5. One of my friends on the
 email circuit recommended that I divide the disk into two partitions,
 one the same size as my internal HD ( 80GB ) and the other what was
 left. They said I should connect the larger one to the Time Machine  
 so
 it will be constantly up to date. I should backup the smaller one
 every month or so to bring it up to date. Imagine my surprise today
 when I switched to the smaller backup partition and got a message  
 that
 I needed 42.4 GB and I only had 41.5GB, so I couldn't backup.
 Any suggestions?
 Thanks

 Wilton
 Wilton Shaw
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is it possible to re-partition a disk without erasing everything and  
starting over?

Wilton

 -~--~~~---~--~~
 You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's  
 G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs -  
 with a particular focus on Power Macs.
 The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our  
 netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
 To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
 Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---


Wilton Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Bruce Johnson


On Nov 5, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

   Is it possible to re-partition a disk without erasing everything and
 starting over?

   Wilton

It depends on what it is you want to do. If you did partition your  
existing drive into 80 G and a  179 G volumes, and want to actually  
accomplish the backup scheme originally discussed (small clone for  
bootability, large time machine for recovery of deleted files), you  
can do this:

Turn off Time Machine.

Rename the volumes to the opposite of what they were.

Copy the Time Machine data over to the larger partition

Turn ON time machine and see if it uses the newly renamed volume with  
the backups to back up.

If so, you can erase the small volume and use it for your CCC or  
SuperDuper bootable clone.

Note I'm not sure Time Machine will work like this, which is why I'm  
suggesting copying the data instead of moving it.

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Failed Backup

2008-11-05 Thread Wilton Shaw

On Nov 5, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:



 On Nov 5, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Wilton Shaw wrote:

I made the smaller portion a full 80 GB. The used area is 38.53 GB
 and the free area is 41.47 GB, which adds up to 80 GB. The message
 I got said I needed 42.4 so the Time Machine wouldn't work. I think
 41.47 GB is plenty of space to make a few upgrades.


 Why do you have time machine set on the smaller volume?


 The scheme is:

 Large drive:

 80G partition: bootable backup partition, regularly clone system drive
 here, using SuperDuper or CCC.

 179G partition: Use for Time machine.

 Time Machine stores an ongoing incremental backup of your stuff,
 including things you deleted, so you can always restore to a point in
 time anywhere between the initial backup and the last backup.

 This means it will require a larger drive (depending on how much file
 churn you have on your system) a MUCH larger drive than the volume
 you're backing up.

 If the 179G partition is complaining it's out of space, then you need
 a larger hard drive, or you need to reconsider using Time Machine.

 If your system is one where you routinely work on a bunch of large
 projects that you move to your computer and then delete, making room
 for the next large project, Time Machine is going to require a very
 large volume, or Time Machine isn't actually a good solution for you.

 You can exclude folders in Time Machine's prefs, so if you constantly
 churn large work files on and off your disk that are adequately backed
 up on other media (such as video raw footage and final DVD's) you can
 store that material in a folder you exclude from Time Machine.

 I exclude my Mail folders form TM because I have an IMAP mail
 service...getting all my mail back is a simple matter of setting up
 the account. So I don't back it up, which eliminates a huge area of
 file churn that would rapidly eat away at Time Machine's space.

 --  
 Bruce Johnson
 University of Arizona
 College of Pharmacy
 Information Technology Group

 Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs

   I want to thank everyone for their helpful suggestions.
I was doing the wrong thing. By using Superduper to update the small  
division and leaving the large division with the Time Machine, I  
resolved my problem.

Wilton


 

Wilton Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---