Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
Bill Richman ha scritto: Well, the list view suggestion worked wonderfully! Thank you! I had wondered how a list view differed from a list box. Now I know... X-) I had been using an SQL request to populate a list box; I just didn't realize that there was a control available that allowed you to keep track of another value in a way not visible to the user. I'm trying to implement an array of the button objects, but I'm a little confused. I need the array to be available to all of the SUBS in the class where they were created (I hope I'm using the right terminology - I need them to be visible to all of the subroutines associated with the form they were created on). If I try PUBLIC aButtons[150] AS Object at the top of the code, like I do for all my other variables shared within the class, I'm told Arrays are forbidden here!. Is there something else I should be doing? Since the form controls are what are calling the subs, it seems like I can't pass the whole aButtons array to the sub triggered by the event (a button click) since the form won't know about it if it's declared only inside the sub where the buttons were first created, right? I understand your problem: you are coming from another programming language, and you are trying to use the other language's concepts. Gambas does not implement certain things, and does implement others. You have a lot of buttons, so it is better to create them from code, as Fabien suggested: For i = 0 to 144 hButton = New Button(me) as button hButton.Tag = i aButtons.Add(hButton) Next aButtons[40].Text (note that in the code suggested 145 buttons are created, not 144...) To store the 144 handles you use an array of objects. In gambas you can not declare typed array of objects, only generic array (or lists). Put this declaration at the beginning of the class: private aButtons as new Object[] Note that aButtons is not an array, but an object, and as such you must instantiate it with NEW. Fortunately you can do it at the same time as the declaration. In the above cycle you will want to set other properties, like X, Y and Text. The Tag property will be handy later. Now, you want to assign event handlers to your buttons. When creating the buttons, each one is created with NEW and a strange clause AS blahblahblah, in this case AS button. This AS clause (which is not mandatory) tells gambas that events raised by the button will be named button_x, where x is the name of the event. To get your handler execute when a button is clicked, you write: public sub button_click() ... ... end Every time one of those buttons is clicked, the button_click subroutine is executed. But inside that subroutine you must know what button was clicked, if the buttons all do different things. Fortunately again, every time an event is fired a hidden variable named LAST is set: it contains a reference to the object which raised the event. So use things like this: public sub button_click() print Clicked button # LAST.Tag print The label of the button is LAST.Text ... end May be that you don't need at all to store the reference of the buttons (aButtons.add(...)), because in the text and tag properties of the buttons themselves you can put enough informations to do your job. But, if you want, you can use the tag property to get back to the handler of the button: we used the tag property to store the index of the button inside the array. Suppose that you want to remember, for later use, what was the last button clicked: private last_clicked_button as Button public sub button_click() print Clicked button # LAST.Tag last_clicked_button = aButtons[LAST.Tag] ' Tag is an index inside the array ' but the following is the same... faster and cleaner last_clicked_button = LAST end Hope this is enough to get you started. A couple thing to better clarify: the array (or list) aButtons, and the variable LAST, are not strong typed. In gambas all the class identifiers are dynamic, so the compiler does not know exactly what such an object is. It will let you write things that will be checked only at runtime. So, in button_click(), you can write LAST.NonExistent = false. The compiler will be happy about that, and you will get a run-time error. The Object[] class lets you store handlers for other objects, and you can mix several types of objects in the same array. This is useful, but it can lead to errors. The second thing is that LAST is the most easy and clear way to access an object inside an event handler. If you use LAST, you can change the name of your object and only have to change the name of the subroutine, not all the code inside it. Regards, -- Doriano Blengino Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth.
Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
Bill Richman ha scritto: #3) My ListBoxes roll smoothly up and down from one list item to another, like movie credits rolling by, and it's really slow. If I were the user, this would make me crazy. Is there a way to get them to jump scroll instead of smooth scroll? :-$ ? i think this not depend on Gambas but on qt or gtk How do I determine this? Forgot to answer to the last question. Gambas can use both GTK and QT without changing a single line of code. Open the project properties window, at the tab Components. There you can choose to use gb.gtk or gb.qt. QT works better and faster; GTK is nicer and totally free, but lacks a few things and has some glitch. Given that it is so simple to switch from one to another, try both. There is also the switcher component, which chooses automatically QT or GTK, to have some fun. Regards, -- Doriano Blengino Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
[Gambas-user] Socket Limitations
gb3, qt4 on Ubuntu 9.10. Are there any known limits on the size of data that can be sent down a socket in one gulp? I have a proxy written in gb3 that uses Socket to communicate with a remote server and uses ServerSocket to get data from the client. ServerSocket seems to gag when given anything above 44k or so but it eventually recovers and retrieves the data being forced down it's throat. However Socket consistently fails between 41 and 47k and never ever recovers. I have proved that Socket is the issue and not ServerSocket by sending 41-47k chunks of data down Socket without ServerSocket being involved in the transaction. I know I can break the data up into multiple chunks before sending it through the socket but the proxy is already doing some very heavy-duty signalling, which proxies are wont to do, so I'm loathe to add even more signals into the proxy. I just want to know if there are known limits on Socket. I don't want to break up the data into multiple chunks for the reason I just mentioned so if I am forced to limit the size of data going down a socket then that's fine by me. It's a design decision I'll have to make. I merely want to know. Well, I want to know for sure because I certainly suspect it :) I am using Read# and Write# commands with Lof(), btw. Oh, I decided to post this to the user list rather than the developer list because I'm not convinced it's a gb3-specific issue. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Socket Limitations
gb3, qt4 on Ubuntu 9.10. Are there any known limits on the size of data that can be sent down a socket in one gulp? I have a proxy written in gb3 that uses Socket to communicate with a remote server and uses ServerSocket to get data from the client. ServerSocket seems to gag when given anything above 44k or so but it eventually recovers and retrieves the data being forced down it's throat. However Socket consistently fails between 41 and 47k and never ever recovers. I have proved that Socket is the issue and not ServerSocket by sending 41-47k chunks of data down Socket without ServerSocket being involved in the transaction. I know I can break the data up into multiple chunks before sending it through the socket but the proxy is already doing some very heavy-duty signalling, which proxies are wont to do, so I'm loathe to add even more signals into the proxy. I just want to know if there are known limits on Socket. I don't want to break up the data into multiple chunks for the reason I just mentioned so if I am forced to limit the size of data going down a socket then that's fine by me. It's a design decision I'll have to make. I merely want to know. Well, I want to know for sure because I certainly suspect it :) I am using Read# and Write# commands with Lof(), btw. Oh, I decided to post this to the user list rather than the developer list because I'm not convinced it's a gb3-specific issue. Do you mean that if you write more than 41K of data on a Socket, it fails silently? Please provide the source code of the network communication, otherwise I can't see what you are doing exactly. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Socket Limitations
2010/1/2 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net: Do you mean that if you write more than 41K of data on a Socket, it fails silently? Yes, precisely. Please provide the source code of the network communication, otherwise I can't see what you are doing exactly. I will have to mock something up over the coming days as the project is now advanced enough to be using real client data, which I can't send you. Thanks for the reply. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
Hi. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. I actually had most of the code figured out and working already, but you've filled in some information about why it works that I wasn't sure about. I had the code creating the buttons, and the button_click sub with the LAST value being stored. I was having trouble getting the array declared in a way that would make it available to the entire class and still keep the compiler happy. Mostly through trial-and-error, I figured out that I could use: PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] to accomplish what I needed to. I don't have the NEW clause in there; I'm not sure if that will come back to bite me or not. I have a few things to clean up in the user interface and I think my project will be ready for use. I'll probably be back to bother you guys again, though. :-) P.S. - Happy New Year, everyone! -Bill Bill Richman - Lincoln, Nebraska Tilter at windmills, maker of pies in the sky, curmudgeon email: b...@geektrap.com web: www.geektrap.com -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Corrupted Form
Hi Benoit, I include a small project that gives a problem: Whenever I modify the form in the IDE the form comes with an extra ) which generates an error at executing the program. ), (modem.get_name )]) - the last ) is hurting The only solution by now is to edit Fmain.form with gedit and run again. Happy 2010 ! In gambaS ! Pino Fixed in revision #2577. Only ListBox or ComboBox having exactly 31 items defined in the IDE got the bug. You are not lucky! :-) Regards, -- Benoît Minisini -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
[Gambas-user] sdl.sound plays mp3 too fast
Hello Some of my mp3 files play at the wrong speed using sdl.sound. They play correctly using commercial players . I notice that they are MPEG Version 2 files. Is this the cause? Any ideas? Regards Bill Lancaster -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/sdl.sound-plays-mp3-too-fast-tp26985683p26985683.html Sent from the gambas-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
Bill Richman ha scritto: Hi. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. I actually had most of the code figured out and working already, but you've filled in some information about why it works that I wasn't sure about. I had the code creating the buttons, and the button_click sub with the LAST value being stored. I was having trouble getting the array declared in a way that would make it available to the entire class and still keep the compiler happy. Mostly through trial-and-error, I figured out that I could use: PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] to accomplish what I needed to. I don't have the NEW clause in there; I'm not sure if that will come back to bite me or not. I have a few things to clean up in the user interface and I think my project will be ready for use. I'll probably be back to bother you guys again, though. :-) P.S. - Happy New Year, everyone! Thanks for the whishes, and Happy New Year to you and everybody in this list. About the declaration, if the compiler accepts PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] I think it will not byte you... but at this point it's me that gets confused :-)... so I go for some experiment, and find the following. The first way I suggested, new object[], is a growing list of objects. The notation you use is a static array; i made some experiment, and found that there is no real differences between the two - your declaration is really a dynamic list containing already a number of elements. There is always something to learn... You insist on troubles having the array visible in the whole class, but it seems to me that there can be no troubles - when you declare variables in a class, there is no way to hide those variables from the class itself; you can only declare them PRIVATE to hide them from the outside. So, every declaration would get what you wanted. Anyway, it works - and this is good. Happy typing, -- Doriano Blengino Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Problem updating svn from revision 2209
when i svn update then ./reconf error. trunk $ ./reconf Remember to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' to `configure.ac'.You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.autoreconf: Entering directory `.'autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettextautoreconf: running: aclocal/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: warning: underquoted definition of smr_ARG_WITHLIB/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocalautoreconf: configure.ac: tracingautoreconf: configure.ac: adding subdirectory main to autoreconfautoreconf: Entering directory `main'autoreconf: running: aclocal -I m4 --install/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: warning: underquoted definition of smr_ARG_WITHLIB/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'/usr/share/aclocal/libgstroke.m4:29: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocalautoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtoolautoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconfautoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheaderautoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --no-forcegbc/Makefile.am:5: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedgbc/Makefile.am:5: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'gbc/Makefile.am:5: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.gbc/Makefile.am:5: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make suregbc/Makefile.am:5: its definition is in aclocal's search path.gbx/Makefile.am:5: library used but `RANLIB' is undefinedgbx/Makefile.am:5: The usual way to define `RANLIB' is to add `AC_PROG_RANLIB'gbx/Makefile.am:5: to `configure.ac' and run `autoconf' again.gbx/Makefile.am:6: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedgbx/Makefile.am:6: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'gbx/Makefile.am:6: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.gbx/Makefile.am:6: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make suregbx/Makefile.am:6: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/compress/Makefile.am:4: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/compress/Makefile.am:4: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/compress/Makefile.am:4: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/compress/Makefile.am:4: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/compress/Makefile.am:4: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/db/Makefile.am:4: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/db/Makefile.am:4: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/db/Makefile.am:4: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/db/Makefile.am:4: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/db/Makefile.am:4: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/debug/Makefile.am:4: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/debug/Makefile.am:4: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/debug/Makefile.am:4: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/debug/Makefile.am:4: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/debug/Makefile.am:4: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/draw/Makefile.am:3: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/draw/Makefile.am:3: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/draw/Makefile.am:3: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/draw/Makefile.am:3: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/draw/Makefile.am:3: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/eval/Makefile.am:4: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/eval/Makefile.am:4: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/eval/Makefile.am:4: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/eval/Makefile.am:4: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/eval/Makefile.am:4: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/gui/Makefile.am:4: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/gui/Makefile.am:4: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/gui/Makefile.am:4: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/gui/Makefile.am:4: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/gui/Makefile.am:4: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/image.effect/Makefile.am:5: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefinedlib/image.effect/Makefile.am:5: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'lib/image.effect/Makefile.am:5: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.lib/image.effect/Makefile.am:5: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.ac', make surelib/image.effect/Makefile.am:5: its definition is in aclocal's search path.lib/image/Makefile.am:5: Libtool library used but
Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
2010/1/1 Doriano Blengino doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it: Bill Richman ha scritto: Hi. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. I actually had most of the code figured out and working already, but you've filled in some information about why it works that I wasn't sure about. I had the code creating the buttons, and the button_click sub with the LAST value being stored. I was having trouble getting the array declared in a way that would make it available to the entire class and still keep the compiler happy. Mostly through trial-and-error, I figured out that I could use: PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] to accomplish what I needed to. I don't have the NEW clause in there; I'm not sure if that will come back to bite me or not. I have a few things to clean up in the user interface and I think my project will be ready for use. I'll probably be back to bother you guys again, though. :-) P.S. - Happy New Year, everyone! Thanks for the whishes, and Happy New Year to you and everybody in this list. About the declaration, if the compiler accepts PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] I think it will not byte you... but at this point it's me that gets confused :-)... so I go for some experiment, and find the following. The first way I suggested, new object[], is a growing list of objects. The notation you use is a static array; no, a static array is defined like that : Public aButton[150] as Object This notation : PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] define a dynamic array but setup 150 entries http://gambasdoc.org/help/lang/arraydecl?show !!! Do not use static arrays as local variables. It works at the moment, but may be removed in the future. !!! i made some experiment, and found that there is no real differences between the two - your declaration is really a dynamic list containing already a number of elements. There is always something to learn... You insist on troubles having the array visible in the whole class, but it seems to me that there can be no troubles - when you declare variables in a class, there is no way to hide those variables from the class itself; you can only declare them PRIVATE to hide them from the outside. So, every declaration would get what you wanted. Anyway, it works - and this is good. Happy typing, -- Doriano Blengino Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Should i upgrade to gambas3
From the Lucid repositories, you can upgrade Gambas2 to the version 2.15. I'm on Karmic, but it should be working with Jaunty too. Use Gambas3 only if you're writing programs for your own use, because the Gambas3 is not a version available for end users. Happy New Year! -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] GAMBAS rules! (And a couple of questions about listboxes and control arrays)
Fabien Bodard ha scritto: 2010/1/1 Doriano Blengino doriano.bleng...@fastwebnet.it: Bill Richman ha scritto: Hi. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. I actually had most of the code figured out and working already, but you've filled in some information about why it works that I wasn't sure about. I had the code creating the buttons, and the button_click sub with the LAST value being stored. I was having trouble getting the array declared in a way that would make it available to the entire class and still keep the compiler happy. Mostly through trial-and-error, I figured out that I could use: PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] to accomplish what I needed to. I don't have the NEW clause in there; I'm not sure if that will come back to bite me or not. I have a few things to clean up in the user interface and I think my project will be ready for use. I'll probably be back to bother you guys again, though. :-) The first way I suggested, new object[], is a growing list of objects. The notation you use is a static array; no, a static array is defined like that : Public aButton[150] as Object This notation : PUBLIC aButtons AS Object[150] define a dynamic array but setup 150 entries http://gambasdoc.org/help/lang/arraydecl?show !!! Do not use static arrays as local variables. It works at the moment, but may be removed in the future. !!! For the second time today I must say there is always something to learn. Thanks. In about three weeks I will be able to distinguish the two cases... I am intelligent, did you know? :-) -- Doriano Blengino Listen twice before you speak. This is why we have two ears, but only one mouth. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
[Gambas-user] I wish an happy new year to all the Gambas Users !
-- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Not sure about what type of project to use, pls advise
Yes, they are issues to consider, if you are not willing to pay for license. Jussi On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 01:10, Kadaitcha Man nospam.nospam.nos...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/31 Jussi Lahtinen jussi.lahti...@gmail.com: License issues... I have understand that GTK+ is free, Qt3 is free only for non-proprietary software, and Qt4 is free for proprietary software also. If those are issues that anyone need consider then how can the likes of ATI and nVidia create control panels for their proprietary drivers? -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Not sure about what type of project to use, pls advise
About Qt3 commercial developer license. http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing Jussi On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 19:53, Jussi Lahtinen jussi.lahti...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, they are issues to consider, if you are not willing to pay for license. Jussi On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 01:10, Kadaitcha Man nospam.nospam.nos...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/31 Jussi Lahtinen jussi.lahti...@gmail.com: License issues... I have understand that GTK+ is free, Qt3 is free only for non-proprietary software, and Qt4 is free for proprietary software also. If those are issues that anyone need consider then how can the likes of ATI and nVidia create control panels for their proprietary drivers? -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Not sure about what type of project to use, pls advise
2010/1/2 Jussi Lahtinen jussi.lahti...@gmail.com: About Qt3 commercial developer license. http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing Interesting, however there is no mention of the different versions of Qt, nor of Qt4 being free for proprietary software, and purchasing the developer version is independent of writing non-free software if you need the additional drivers and features. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Re: [Gambas-user] Socket Limitations
2010/1/2 Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net: Please provide the source code of the network communication, otherwise I can't see what you are doing exactly. Ok, here is some code that adequately reproduces the problem, and the exact same code with a smaller chunk of text that does not have the problem. SocketOK works. ChokeASocket is exactly 100% the same code except that it has a 48k file to transmit to the remote server. The remote server is already setup in the code so just run it. I recommend running SocketOK first. I have tried this with four independent servers and get the same result, SocketDeath. Regards, SocketOK.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ChokeASocket.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
