Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
On 29-12-2014 16:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The note about C++14 conformance is great as it stands modulo link errors. Why is it great to not mention the experimental qualifier? Do all files / libraries have to be compiled with the same -std option? If so, this option causes ABI issues by itself. Olaf
Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
On 29-12-2014 18:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29 December 2014 at 15:34, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The note on C++14 conformance referred to is not the place for this but: is our C++11 support really less tested and more experimental than our C++03 support at this point? One thing I can think of might be gcc bootstrap. The main difference is ABI stability, which is not guaranteed for C++11 (but should be once the std::string changes and resulting churn settle down). Is std::string still being fixed? Will that fix be part of 5.0? Are ABI concerns holding back other things as well? Olaf
Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
On 26-12-2014 1:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. It should probably be https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html I don't think that's right, it should link to a page like https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/ Important: Because the final ISO C++14 standard was only recently published, GCC's support is experimental. Is C++11 support no longer experimental? That hasn't changed yet, but it should be announced on https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/status.html when it does. Okay, but shouldn't that be reflected in the announcement? I doesn't mention the experimental status at all. > GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23] > Support for all C++14 language features has been added to the development sources for GCC, and will be available when GCC 5 is released next year.
404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. > Important: Because the final ISO C++14 standard was only recently published, GCC's support is experimental. Is C++11 support no longer experimental? Is C++11 available by default or does it still require -std=c++11? Greetings, Olaf
