Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-25 Thread Christian Joensson 
On 9/23/05, Christian Joensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 9/23/05, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Christian Joensson wrote:
 
   FAIL: g++.dg/other/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
   FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
   XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
   FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb83.C (test for excess errors)
 
  Do you have g++.log output for these failures?

 sorry, I didn't see this before I just sent off this:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00777.html

well, a clean bootstrap (not bubblestrap) is fine... sorry for the noise...

--
Cheers,

/ChJ

Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-23 Thread Mark Mitchell 
Eric Botcazou wrote:
   The GCC 4.0.2 RC3 prerelease is spinning now.
 
 Regressions on Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 and 9:
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_allocate_big_per_type.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_delete.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_new.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-3.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-1.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-2.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-3.cc execution test
 FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-4.cc execution test

This patch:

2005-09-19  Benjamin Kosnik  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-09-19  Jakub Jelinek  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

to libstdc++ is the only obvious culprit.  Benjamin, Jakub, are you
investigating these failures?  We need to get this resolved ASAP.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-23 Thread Benjamin Kosnik 

 to libstdc++ is the only obvious culprit.  Benjamin, Jakub, are you
 investigating these failures?  We need to get this resolved ASAP.

I'm on it.

-benjamin

Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-23 Thread Mark Mitchell 
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
to libstdc++ is the only obvious culprit.  Benjamin, Jakub, are you
investigating these failures?  We need to get this resolved ASAP.
 
 
 I'm on it.

Thanks!

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-22 Thread Mark Mitchell 
The GCC 4.0.2 RC3 prerelease is spinning now.

If all goes well, it will be available later today.

FYI,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-22 Thread Eric Botcazou 
  The GCC 4.0.2 RC3 prerelease is spinning now.

Regressions on Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 and 9:
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_allocate_big_per_type.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_delete.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_new.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-3.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-1.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-2.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-3.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-4.cc execution test

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

2005-09-22 Thread Christian Joensson 
On 9/22/05, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The GCC 4.0.2 RC3 prerelease is spinning now.

 If all goes well, it will be available later today.

whoa, I get a few regressions here, compare this with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01019.html ...

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 22 06:14:22 UTC 2005

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   ce3810b

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020201-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c link

=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes34710
# of unexpected failures2
# of expected failures  95
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  534

Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020201-1.c (test for excess errors)

=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes34714
# of unexpected failures1
# of expected failures  95
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  532

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes69424
# of unexpected failures3
# of expected failures  190
# of untested testcases 56
# of unsupported tests  1066
/usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.2

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix/-m64

=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes8188
# of expected failures  1
# of unsupported tests  17

Running target unix
=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: g++.dg/other/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb83.C (test for excess errors)

=== g++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===

# of expected passes11030
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  68
# of unsupported tests  92

Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb83.C (test for excess errors)

=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes11062
# of unexpected failures3
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  68
# of unsupported tests  90

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes22092
# of unexpected failures6
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  136
# of unsupported tests  182
/usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 4.0.2

Platform: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --with-cpu=v7
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,f95,java,objc,treelang

--
Cheers,

/ChJ