Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-10-04 Thread Gerald Pfeifer 
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
 Ok with me.

Applied now.

Gerald

Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-09-27 Thread Richard Guenther 
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

 On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
  As commented to my last status report develop.html does not reflect
  reality anymore.  The following tries to adjust it carefully in
  this respect.
 
 I believe you got the math wrong in one case, when you went from
 four months that a branch will need to be maintained in the old
 model up to six months.  Is it possible you ment to substract the
 two months Stage 2 used to take instead of add it?

Indeed, I mixed in the length of stage1.  Four month would be
still about correct (2 month stage3 plus 2 month before we branch,
in the old model it was 2 month stage2 plus 2 month stage3).

 Since it seems hard to predicat the time between the end of Stage 3
 and branching, I suggest to just say a few months.

 The patch below does that in its last hunk and makes one or the
 other editorial change.
 
 Thoughts?

Ok with me.

Thanks,
Richard.

Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-09-20 Thread Dave Korn 
Richard Guenther wrote:

   * develop.html: Adjust to reflect recent practice.

  TYVM :)

cheers,
  DaveK

Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-09-20 Thread Mark Mitchell 
Richard Guenther wrote:

 2009-09-20  Richard Guenther  rguent...@suse.de
 
   * develop.html: Adjust to reflect recent practice.

OK.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
m...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-09-20 Thread Theodore Papadopoulo 

Richard Guenther wrote:

As commented to my last status report develop.html does not reflect
reality anymore.  The following tries to adjust it carefully in
this respect.

 
 h3Schedule/h3
 
-pDevelopment on our main branch will proceed in three stages.  Each

-stage will be two months in length./p
+pDevelopment on our main branch will proceed in three stages./p

Just a minor tweak...
Since there are only effectively two stages, wouldn't it be better to 
state two stages here ?


   Theo.

Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

2009-09-20 Thread Richard Guenther 
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:

 Richard Guenther wrote:
  As commented to my last status report develop.html does not reflect
  reality anymore.  The following tries to adjust it carefully in
  this respect.
  
h3Schedule/h3
   -pDevelopment on our main branch will proceed in three stages.  Each
  -stage will be two months in length./p
  +pDevelopment on our main branch will proceed in three stages./p
 Just a minor tweak...
 Since there are only effectively two stages, wouldn't it be better to state
 two stages here ?

Effectively after leaving Stage 3 we enter a Stage 4 before the
release branch is created.  So all, two, three and four would be
in some way correct ;)  Thus I didn't bother to change this detail.

Richard.