Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
The fortran front-end needs to recognize clog10, clog10f and clog10l a proper built-ins. Attached patch tries to add them to clog10, under a new category: DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (as suggested by jsm28). Can someone review this? Is it OK? Just realized I forgot the ChangeLog entry to go with it. OK to commit? 2005-06-28 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f and clog10l. Index: gcc/builtins.def === RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/builtins.def,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -3 -p -r1.105 builtins.def --- gcc/builtins.def27 Jun 2005 12:17:18 - 1.105 +++ gcc/builtins.def3 Jul 2005 02:44:06 - @@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, DEF_BUILTIN (ENUM, "__builtin_" NAME, BUILT_IN_NORMAL, TYPE, TYPE, \ true, true, !flag_isoc99, ATTRS, TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS, true) +/* Builtin that C99 reserve the name for future use. We can still recognize + the builtin in C99 mode but we can't produce it implicitly. */ +#undef DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN +#define DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN(ENUM, NAME, TYPE, ATTRS)\ + DEF_BUILTIN (ENUM, "__builtin_" NAME, BUILT_IN_NORMAL, TYPE, TYPE, \ + true, true, true, ATTRS, false, true) + /* Allocate the enum and the name for a builtin, but do not actually define it here at all. */ #undef DEF_BUILTIN_STUB @@ -436,6 +443,9 @@ DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CIMAGL, DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOG, "clog", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOGF, "clogf", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOGL, "clogl", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10, "clog10", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10F, "clog10f", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10L, "clog10l", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJ, "conj", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJF, "conjf", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJL, "conjl", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST)
Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
OK to commit? Ping. This problem is really blocking a very nice gfortran feature (support for large real kinds). Since it is very short, could someone review it? FX 2005-07-19 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f and clog10l. Index: gcc/builtins.def === RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/builtins.def,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -3 -p -r1.105 builtins.def --- gcc/builtins.def27 Jun 2005 12:17:18 - 1.105 +++ gcc/builtins.def3 Jul 2005 02:44:06 - @@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, DEF_BUILTIN (ENUM, "__builtin_" NAME, BUILT_IN_NORMAL, TYPE, TYPE, \ true, true, !flag_isoc99, ATTRS, TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS, true) +/* Builtin that C99 reserve the name for future use. We can still recognize + the builtin in C99 mode but we can't produce it implicitly. */ +#undef DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN +#define DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN(ENUM, NAME, TYPE, ATTRS)\ + DEF_BUILTIN (ENUM, "__builtin_" NAME, BUILT_IN_NORMAL, TYPE, TYPE, \ + true, true, true, ATTRS, false, true) + /* Allocate the enum and the name for a builtin, but do not actually define it here at all. */ #undef DEF_BUILTIN_STUB @@ -436,6 +443,9 @@ DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CIMAGL, DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOG, "clog", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOGF, "clogf", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CLOGL, "clogl", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10, "clog10", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10F, "clog10f", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) +DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_CLOG10L, "clog10l", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_MATHFN_FPROUNDING) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJ, "conj", BT_FN_COMPLEX_DOUBLE_COMPLEX_DOUBLE, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJF, "conjf", BT_FN_COMPLEX_FLOAT_COMPLEX_FLOAT, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST) DEF_C99_BUILTIN(BUILT_IN_CONJL, "conjl", BT_FN_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE_COMPLEX_LONGDOUBLE, ATTR_CONST_NOTHROW_LIST)
Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:46:34AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote: > * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins > that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f > and clog10l. Ok. r~
Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2
>> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins >> that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f >> and clog10l. > > Ok. Commited. Thanks, FX
