Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-07 Thread Kaz Kojima 
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
 
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
 
 With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
 
 Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they 
 work OK on your systems.

sh4-unknown-linux-gnu is ok:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00354.html

Regards,
kaz

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-07 Thread Mark Mitchell 

Kaz Kojima wrote:

Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:

  ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/

With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.

Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they 
work OK on your systems.



sh4-unknown-linux-gnu is ok:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00354.html


Thanks!

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

RE: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-07 Thread Dave Korn 
Original Message
From: Mark Mitchell
Sent: 03 July 2005 19:21

 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
 


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00373.html

  Cygwin's ok.  Still some apparent g++ regressions, relative to 4.0.0, but
everything's better than 4.0.1 RC1's results.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] tsts]$ diff b4.txt af.txt 
10a11,12
 FAIL: g++.dg/template/repo1.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.dg/template/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
30a33,38
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate4.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/instantiate6.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/repo1.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/repo2.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/repo4.C (test for excess errors)


  No other significant changes to report.  I have really no knowledge of
what's going on here with templates and repositories; do you want to see the
.log file?

cheers,
  DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-05 Thread Mark Mitchell 

Eric Botcazou wrote:


We have 1 new failure on SPARC/Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 over RC2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00137.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00138.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00139.html

WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/1.cc execution test

  try {
std::string str03(csz01 - 1, 'z');  --- stuck here


This didn't happen in RC2 and I've not investigated what changed.  The code is 
the same on Solaris 7 and 8, but the Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 machines are 
substantially more limited than the Solaris 8, 9 and 10 machines.


Hmph.  I'm not going to worry about this too much, on the grounds that 
Solaris 7 is pretty old now...


Thanks for the report!

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-05 Thread Mark Mitchell 

Ulrich Weigand wrote:

Mark Mitchell wrote:


GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:

  ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/

With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.

Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they 
work OK on your systems.



s390(x)-ibm-linux is still looking good:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00182.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00183.html


Thanks.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-05 Thread Paul Brook 
On Sunday 03 July 2005 19:21, Mark Mitchell wrote:
 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:

ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/

 With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.

 Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
 work OK on your systems.

arm-none-elf results are ok. No new regression from 4.0.0.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00254.html

Paul

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-05 Thread Mark Mitchell 

Paul Brook wrote:

On Sunday 03 July 2005 19:21, Mark Mitchell wrote:


GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:

  ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/

With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.

Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
work OK on your systems.



arm-none-elf results are ok. No new regression from 4.0.0.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00254.html


Thanks!


--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-05 Thread H. J. Lu 
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:55:52PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
 
 On Jul 4, 2005, at 1:48 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
 
 On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:21:15AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:
 
   ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/
 
 With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.
 
 Please do download tarballs from the above URL and confirm that they
 work OK on your systems.
 
 
 Can someone verify the missing debug info bug:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22295
 
 It is a regression from 3.4. Is a known issue?
 
 Yes it is PR 21828.

I proposed patches for PR 21828 at

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00270.html


H.J.

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-04 Thread David Edelsohn 
AIX is good:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00216.html

David

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-04 Thread Andreas Tobler 

Darwin here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00221.html

ok so far.
Andreas

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-04 Thread John David Anglin 
PA is ok:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00223.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00218.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00186.html

The failure of pr21817-1.c on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 is a minor
testsuite issue that is now fixed on the trunk.

The failure of asm-subreg-1.c on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 is probably
a regression although there is some debate about that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491.

The failure of ext/array_allocator/2.cc on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
is a latent bug on 64-bit strictly aligned targets:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495.  Fixing it
requires a v3 library version bump.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada  (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3

2005-07-03 Thread Eric Botcazou 
 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 is now available here:

ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050702/

 With luck, this will be the last 4.0.1 release candidate.

SPARC/Solaris 8, 9, 10 are OK:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00141.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00142.html

We have 1 new failure on SPARC/Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 over RC2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00137.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00138.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00139.html

WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/1.cc execution test

  try {
std::string str03(csz01 - 1, 'z');  --- stuck here
VERIFY( str03.size() != 0 );
VERIFY( str03.size() = str03.capacity() );
  }  
  // NB: bad_alloc is regrettable but entirely kosher for
  // out-of-memory situations.
  catch(std::bad_alloc fail) {
VERIFY( true );
  }
  catch(...) {
VERIFY( false );
  }

The machines are apparently stuck in 'wmemset' from libc initializing str03, 
which is a bg object:

  csz01 = str01.max_size();

This didn't happen in RC2 and I've not investigated what changed.  The code is 
the same on Solaris 7 and 8, but the Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 machines are 
substantially more limited than the Solaris 8, 9 and 10 machines.

-- 
Eric Botcazou