Re: Remove the __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__?
Deprecate it for 4.9.x. Remove it later. We don't need to keep around this macro which has been obsolete for at least two releases. Agreed. Definitely deprecated for 4.9. The internal style is to now check __cplusplus and in the future whatever feature testing macros are developed. -benjamin
Re: Remove the __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__?
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: While thinking about C++ n3694 feature test macros I noticed we still define __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ macro in c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c. We got rid of all uses of it in libstdc++. I propose we get rid of it here too. User's shouldn't be relying on it. No? OTOH, it may have been a proxy for __cplusplus for users for a good while. People may still be using it even if the library no longer uses it. What do folks think? Please keep it. Removing it won't gain you anything, and people do rely on it. -- Marc Glisse
Re: Remove the __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__?
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net wrote: While thinking about C++ n3694 feature test macros I noticed we still define __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ macro in c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c. We got rid of all uses of it in libstdc++. I propose we get rid of it here too. User's shouldn't be relying on it. No? OTOH, it may have been a proxy for __cplusplus for users for a good while. People may still be using it even if the library no longer uses it. What do folks think? Deprecate it for 4.9.x. Remove it later. We don't need to keep around this macro which has been obsolete for at least two releases. -- Gaby
