Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64

2009-04-11 Thread Adam Nemet
Adam Nemet  writes:
> For two testresults now the cleanup tests are failing in both gcc and g++:
>
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg01031.html
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg00592.html
>
> I waited for another testresults because there were some bug fixes in this
> area after the eh changes.
>
> Does somebody know what's going on?  I'll look at it otherwise.

I am not exactly sure what has exposed this but the bug seems to be old.
can_throw_external in except.c does not look at the branch delay slot (second
entry in a SEQUENCE) to determine whether the insn may throw or not.

In gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c for example after inlining fn3, the trapping store is
moved to the delay slot of abort, which is a nothrow function so we decide
that fn2 can't throw and then ultimately remove the eh region around fn1 in
fn0.

Adam


Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64

2009-04-11 Thread Adam Nemet
Adam Nemet  writes:
> I am not exactly sure what has exposed this but the bug seems to be old.
> can_throw_external in except.c does not look at the branch delay slot (second
> entry in a SEQUENCE) to determine whether the insn may throw or not.
>
> In gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c for example after inlining fn3, the trapping store is
> moved to the delay slot of abort, which is a nothrow function so we decide
> that fn2 can't throw and then ultimately remove the eh region around fn1 in
> fn0.

I forgot to mention that I started testing a patch.

Adam


Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64

2009-04-12 Thread John David Anglin
The same tests now fail on hppa.  This is PR 39651.  I'm fairly certain
this was introduced by the following change:

2009-03-28  Jan Hubicka  

Merge from pretty-ipa:

2009-03-27  Jan Hubicka  
* cgraph.c (dump_cgraph_node): Add replace output flag by process.
...

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Adam Nemet wrote:

> Adam Nemet  writes:
> > For two testresults now the cleanup tests are failing in both gcc and g++:
> >
> >   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg01031.html
> >   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg00592.html
> >
> > I waited for another testresults because there were some bug fixes in this
> > area after the eh changes.
> >
> > Does somebody know what's going on?  I'll look at it otherwise.
> 
> I am not exactly sure what has exposed this but the bug seems to be old.
> can_throw_external in except.c does not look at the branch delay slot (second
> entry in a SEQUENCE) to determine whether the insn may throw or not.
> 
> In gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c for example after inlining fn3, the trapping store is
> moved to the delay slot of abort, which is a nothrow function so we decide
> that fn2 can't throw and then ultimately remove the eh region around fn1 in
> fn0.

The same could occur on hppa.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin  dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada  (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)


Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64

2009-04-12 Thread Adam Nemet
John David Anglin writes:
> The same tests now fail on hppa.  This is PR 39651.  I'm fairly certain
> this was introduced by the following change:

I put this PR in the checkin that was just approved on gcc-patc...@.  Please
close the bug if it fixes the failures on hppa too.

Adam