backporting fixes for xtensa to stable branches

2017-05-30 Thread Max Filippov 
Hi Sterling,

for xtensa we have a number of bugfixes in the mainline that were never
backported to the stable branches. It'd be great having them in the stable
gcc releases instead of carrying the fixes in various toolchain builders.
Would it be ok to do the following backports?

to the gcc-5-branch:

r226963 ("xtensa: use unwind-dw2-fde-dip instead of unwind-dw2-fde"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=226963
r226964 ("xtensa: fix _Unwind_GetCFA"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=226964
r227809 ("xtensa: fix xtensa_fallback_frame_state for call0 ABI"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=227809
r233505 ("xtensa: fix libgcc build with --text-section-literals"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=233505
r241313 ("xtensa: don't use unwind-dw2-fde-dip with elf targets"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=241313
r242979 ("xtensa: Fix PR target/78603"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=242979
r248586 ("gcc: xtensa: fix fprintf format specifiers"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=248586

to the gcc-6-branch:

r241313 ("xtensa: don't use unwind-dw2-fde-dip with elf targets"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=241313
r241748 ("xtensa: Fix PR target/78118"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=241748
r242979 ("xtensa: Fix PR target/78603"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=242979
r248586 ("gcc: xtensa: fix fprintf format specifiers"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=248586

to the gcc-7-branch:

r248586 ("gcc: xtensa: fix fprintf format specifiers"):
  https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=248586

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

Re: backporting fixes for xtensa to stable branches

2017-05-30 Thread augustine.sterl...@gmail.com 
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Max Filippov  wrote:
> Hi Sterling,
>
> for xtensa we have a number of bugfixes in the mainline that were never
> backported to the stable branches. It'd be great having them in the stable
> gcc releases instead of carrying the fixes in various toolchain builders.
> Would it be ok to do the following backports?

Yes. All backports are absolutely fine.

Re: backporting fixes for xtensa to stable branches

2017-05-30 Thread Max Filippov 
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:34 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Max Filippov  wrote:
>> Hi Sterling,
>>
>> for xtensa we have a number of bugfixes in the mainline that were never
>> backported to the stable branches. It'd be great having them in the stable
>> gcc releases instead of carrying the fixes in various toolchain builders.
>> Would it be ok to do the following backports?
>
> Yes. All backports are absolutely fine.

Thanks. Applied all mentioned patches to the corresponding branches.

-- Max