[Bug c++/17829] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:35
---
Reduced to:
class QString {};
class QFontDatabase
{
static void findFont();
static void parseFontName(const QString name, QString foundry, QString family);
};
static void parseFontName(const QString name, QString foundry, QString family){}
void QFontDatabase::findFont( )
{
QString family_name, foundry_name, family;
parseFontName( family, foundry_name, family_name );
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug c++/17829] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:36 --- : Search converges between 2004-09-27-014001-trunk (#563) and 2004-09-27-161002-trunk (#564). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug rtl-optimization/17544] [4.0 Regression] incorrect -Wunreachable-code warning for reachable code following a do statement
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-04 12:37
---
The implicit return statement is added within cp/decl.c:finish_function:
if (DECL_MAIN_P (current_function_decl))
{
/* Make it so that `main' always returns 0 by default. */
#if VMS_TARGET
finish_return_stmt (integer_one_node);
#else
finish_return_stmt (integer_zero_node);
#endif
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17544
[Bug c++/17544] [4.0 Regression] incorrect -Wunreachable-code warning for reachable code following a do statement
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-04 12:38 --- Setting this as C++ bug, the C++ frontend should mark the statement in some special way that middle-end can later detect to avoid the warning. -- What|Removed |Added CC||giovannibajo at libero dot ||it Component|rtl-optimization|c++ http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17544
[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:39 --- Note if I change QString to be just an int, we accept the code. Confirmed, we should find the class version as we do with changing QString to be an int. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||rejects-valid Known to fail||3.4.3 4.0.0 Known to work||3.4.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-04 12:39:52 date|| Summary|wrong error: call of|[3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong |overloaded function is |error: call of overloaded |ambiguous |function is ambiguous Target Milestone|--- |3.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:43 --- Related to bug 17801 which was caused by the same patch. -- What|Removed |Added CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Known to work|3.4.0 |3.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug c/16202] The -Wsequence-point warnng misses many important instances
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-04 12:44 --- Subject: Re: The -Wsequence-point warnng misses many important instances On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: JSM, can you have a look at this patch? It is said to be fully functional already, so it would be a shame if it did not make it into 4.0 just for lack of attention. I don't see either a testcase or a patch to the existing gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c to remove XFAILs in this patch. A complete submission including tests should be sent to gcc-patches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16202
[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:44 --- Doesn't koenig lookup apply? That'll pull in ::parseFontName because of ::QString -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug c++/13717] duplicated parameter name not caught ?
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-04 12:45 --- As mentioned in PR 17786 by Nathan: correct. there is a related bug in that we fail to compile things like void foo (int x, int ary[sizeof(x)]); -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.3.2 3.4.0 4.0 |3.3.2 3.4.0 4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13717
[Bug tree-optimization/17671] PHI-OPT is not smart enough
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:45 --- Posted a new patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00221.html. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17671
[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:46 --- I don't know but Comeau C++ online tester accepts the code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug rtl-optimization/17825] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:49 --- Confirmed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Known to fail||4.0.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-04 12:49:30 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17825
[Bug target/17771] -O2 -mmvcle: internal compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1915
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17771
[Bug target/17773] -O2: internal compiler error: in sched_analyze_2, at sched-deps.c:757
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17773
[Bug target/17774] -O2: internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:5861
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17774
[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h
--- Additional Comments From ralf_corsepius at rtems dot org 2004-10-04 12:51 --- 1. The PR is against 3.4-branch, because this is what I am using, what I tested the patch with and what I am reporting the bug against. 2. The patch applies to HEAD without changes. 3. Why is GCC asking to file PRs to bugzilla, if they are requested to post patch proposals to gcc-patches afterwards. Sorry, but this is just ineffective. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17824
[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 12:54 --- Because normally if you have a patch you just post it in the first place to gcc-patches@ and bypass bugzilla and only make a new bug iff you patch is ignored. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17824
[Bug bootstrap/17817] [4.0 Regression] restage[1,2,3] and then bootstrap no longer cause build dir to be rebuilt
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-04 13:06:07 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17817
[Bug fortran/17612] ICE in gfortran
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:12 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17612
[Bug libgcj/17438] clean up thread native state using phantom reference
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:12 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-04 13:12:51 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17438
[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h
--- Additional Comments From ralf_corsepius at rtems dot org 2004-10-04 13:22 --- 1. I am used to my patches being ignored :( Therefore I usually attach them to a PR they are trying to solve to prevent them from being ignored. 2. Note that http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html doesn't even mention gcc-patches@ 3. I would expect PRs in bugzilla to become assigned to somebody (maintainer) who will take care about it and process it. Anyway, I'll once again, duplicate this PR and try to send it to gcc-patches@, if I should I manage to convince gcc-patches@'s broken spam filter to let me send. All in all pretty unpleasant for a trivial 4-liner patch and not necessarily encouraging to contribute further patches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17824
[Bug target/17824] Hard-coded AS and LD in c4x.h
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 13:28 --- For number 2, read which is on the contribute page: When you have all these pieces, bundle them up in a mail message and send it to the appropriate mailing list(s). (Patches will go to one or more lists depending on what you are changing.) For further information on the GCC CVS repository, see the Anonymous read-only CVS access and Read-write CVS access pages. And mailing list is a link to lists.html which says gcc-patches is the appropriate mailing list: All patches (including those for front ends and web pages) and all discussion for a particular patch should be sent to this list. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17824
[Bug middle-end/16973] [4.0 Regression] Differences between addresses of labels broken
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:29 --- Mine, I have a fix will send it out soon. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16973
[Bug middle-end/15014] [4.0 regression] labels after are removed even though they are used
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:29 --- Mine I will send it out soon. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15014
[Bug middle-end/15014] [4.0 regression] labels after are removed even though they are used
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:46 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00246.html. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15014
[Bug middle-end/16973] [4.0 Regression] Differences between addresses of labels broken
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 14:46 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00246.html. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16973
[Bug ada/13897] gnat does not implement tasking on powerpc
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:01 --- Subject: Bug 13897 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:01:52 Modified files: gcc/ada: Makefile.in ChangeLog Added files: gcc/ada: i-vxwork-x86.ads system-linux-ppc.ads Log message: 2004-10-04 Bernard Banner [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR ada/13897 * Makefile.in: Add section for powerpc linux Add variant i-vxwork-x86.ads * i-vxwork-x86.ads, system-linux-ppc.ads: New files. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ada/i-vxwork-x86.ads.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ada/system-linux-ppc.ads.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ada/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.95r2=1.96 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ada/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.592r2=1.593 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13897
[Bug ada/13897] gnat does not implement tasking on powerpc
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:04 --- Implemented on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13897
[Bug c++/17829] [3.4/4.0 Regression] wrong error: call of overloaded function is ambiguous
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:12 --- ah, [3.4.2]/2a says koenig is not done when regular lookup finds a member fn. Forgot that bit. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829
[Bug libfortran/17706] reading a value of 0.0 gives a value of -0.0
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:32 --- Subject: Bug 17706 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:32:13 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: pr17706.f90 Log message: 2004-10-04 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bud Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/17706 PR fortran/16434 * io/format.c (parse_format_list): Set repeat count for S, SP, SS, BN and BZ formats. * io/write.c (output_float): Don't output minus zero. libgfortran/ * gfortran/pr17706.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f: Remove xfail. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4379r2=1.4380 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr17706.f90.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.95r2=1.96 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17706
[Bug libfortran/16434] gfortran SP edit descriptor failure: test f77-edit-s-out.f
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:32 --- Subject: Bug 16434 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:32:13 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: pr17706.f90 Log message: 2004-10-04 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bud Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/17706 PR fortran/16434 * io/format.c (parse_format_list): Set repeat count for S, SP, SS, BN and BZ formats. * io/write.c (output_float): Don't output minus zero. libgfortran/ * gfortran/pr17706.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f: Remove xfail. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4379r2=1.4380 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr17706.f90.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.95r2=1.96 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16434
[Bug libfortran/17706] reading a value of 0.0 gives a value of -0.0
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:33 --- Subject: Bug 17706 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:33:18 Modified files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77: f77-edit-s-out.f libgfortran/io : format.c write.c Log message: 2004-10-04 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bud Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/17706 PR fortran/16434 * io/format.c (parse_format_list): Set repeat count for S, SP, SS, BN and BZ formats. * io/write.c (output_float): Don't output minus zero. libgfortran/ * gfortran/pr17706.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f: Remove xfail. Actually apply the patch this time. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.1r2=1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/format.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.6r2=1.7 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/write.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.15r2=1.16 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17706
[Bug libfortran/16434] gfortran SP edit descriptor failure: test f77-edit-s-out.f
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 15:33 --- Subject: Bug 16434 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 15:33:18 Modified files: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77: f77-edit-s-out.f libgfortran/io : format.c write.c Log message: 2004-10-04 Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bud Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/17706 PR fortran/16434 * io/format.c (parse_format_list): Set repeat count for S, SP, SS, BN and BZ formats. * io/write.c (output_float): Don't output minus zero. libgfortran/ * gfortran/pr17706.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f: Remove xfail. Actually apply the patch this time. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g77/f77-edit-s-out.f.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.1r2=1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/format.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.6r2=1.7 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libgfortran/io/write.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.15r2=1.16 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16434
