[Bug fortran/5900] [g77 gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-14 16:07 --- Lapack on the IA-64 does not look good right now. Here are the results with 20041212 snapshot, with Steve Kargl's I/O patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00844.html applied: CES: 24 out of 3276 tests failed to pass the threshold CEV: 92 out of 970 tests failed to pass the threshold CSX: 54 out of 3406 tests failed to pass the threshold CVX: 580 out of 5484 tests failed to pass the threshold CGG:1 out of 2184 tests failed to pass the threshold CHS: 35 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold CHS: 39 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold CHS: 31 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold CHS: 35 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold CHS: 31 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold CST:1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold CST:1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold CST drivers: 1 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold CGE:246 out of 3653 tests failed to pass the threshold CGE drivers:146 out of 4866 tests failed to pass the threshold CGB: 2481 out of 28893 tests failed to pass the threshold CGB drivers: 2642 out of 29094 tests failed to pass the threshold CGT:262 out of 2694 tests failed to pass the threshold CGT drivers:282 out of 2033 tests failed to pass the threshold CPO:228 out of 1628 tests failed to pass the threshold CPO drivers:144 out of 1910 tests failed to pass the threshold CPP:211 out of 1242 tests failed to pass the threshold CPP drivers:154 out of 1865 tests failed to pass the threshold CPB:657 out of 3458 tests failed to pass the threshold CPB drivers:432 out of 4750 tests failed to pass the threshold DXV drivers:200 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold SXV drivers: 37 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold SST:1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold ZES: 24 out of 3276 tests failed to pass the threshold ZEV: 92 out of 970 tests failed to pass the threshold ZSX: 51 out of 3406 tests failed to pass the threshold ZVX: 556 out of 5472 tests failed to pass the threshold ZXV drivers: 24 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold ZHS: 39 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold ZHS: 35 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold ZHS: 35 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold ZHS: 31 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold ZHS: 35 out of 2058 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGE:246 out of 3653 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGE drivers:146 out of 4866 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGB: 2481 out of 28893 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGB drivers: 2642 out of 29094 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGT:262 out of 2694 tests failed to pass the threshold ZGT drivers:282 out of 2033 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPO:228 out of 1628 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPO drivers:144 out of 1910 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPP:211 out of 1242 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPP drivers:154 out of 1865 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPB:657 out of 3458 tests failed to pass the threshold ZPB drivers:432 out of 4750 tests failed to pass the threshold Without the I/O patch, the following additionall failures occur: + CPT:120 out of 1778 tests failed to pass the threshold + CPT drivers: 40 out of788 tests failed to pass the threshold + CHE: 62 out of 1624 tests failed to pass the threshold + CHE drivers: 60 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold + CHP: 60 out of 1404 tests failed to pass the threshold + CHP drivers: 60 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold + CSY:169 out of 1864 tests failed to pass the threshold + CSY drivers:168 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold + CSP:155 out of 1620 tests failed to pass the threshold + CSP drivers:168 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold + CTR:348 out of 7672 tests failed to pass the threshold + CTP:316 out of 7392 tests failed to pass the threshold + CTB:494 out of 19888 tests failed to pass the threshold + CLS drivers:900 out of 65268 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZPT:120 out of 1778 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZPT drivers: 40 out of788 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZHE: 62 out of 1624 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZHE drivers: 60 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZHP: 60 out of 1404 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZHP drivers: 60 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZSY:169 out of 1864 tests failed to pass the threshold + ZSY
[Bug c++/18949] [4.0 Regression] trouble with const_cast in templates
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 15:39 --- Subject: Bug 18949 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 15:39:12 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c typeck.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template: cast1.C Log message: cp: PR c++/18949 * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build): INDIRECT_REF case Check that a REFERENCE_REF_P is dereferencing a reference type. * typeck.c (build_static_cast): Convert from reference even in a template. (build_reinterpret_cast, build_const_cast, build_c_cast): Likewise. testsuite: PR c++/18949 * g++.dg/template/cast1.C: New. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4532r2=1.4533 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.956r2=1.957 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.603r2=1.604 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4749r2=1.4750 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/cast1.C.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18949
[Bug bootstrap/18972] Regression: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.0-20041212 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1): Bootstrap comparison failure
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 16:21 --- (In reply to comment #5) Indeed a Heisenbug: Does anyone know how I could disassemble those .o files to get something more human readable? Use otool. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18972
[Bug bootstrap/18972] Regression: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.0-20041212 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1): Bootstrap comparison failure
--- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de 2004-12-14 16:18 --- Indeed a Heisenbug: reload.o from stage2 and stage3 differ when produced like this: touch ../../gcc-4.0-20041212/gcc/reload.c make restage2 BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer make restage3 BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer the resultingg reload.o differ just in one byte at offset B577h: for stage2 it is: D0 for stage3 it is: C4 now in context: stage2: B570h: 7E B9 31 C0 8B 8C 24 D0 00 00 00 89 84 24 6C 02 stage3: B570h: 7E B9 31 C0 8B 8C 24 C4 00 00 00 89 84 24 6C 02 Does anyone know how I could disassemble those .o files to get something more human readable? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18972
[Bug c/18988] New: 4.0 build failure resulting in internal compiler error, not diagnostic.
Build as of today's cvs 4.0 ~10:10am est, configured with: ../gcc/configure --target=avr --disable-nls --enable-languages=c Resulting with failure: /Applications/avr/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc -B/Applications/avr/gcc-build/gcc/ -B/usr/local/avr/bin/ -B/ usr/local/avr/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/avr/include -isystem /usr/local/avr/sys-include -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold- style-definition -isystem ./include -DDF=SF -Dinhibit_libc -mcall-prologues -g -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -Dinhibit_libc -I. -I -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/ -I../../gcc/gcc/../ include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -DL_fixdfdi -c ../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_fixdfdi.o ../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__fixdfdi': ../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:1198: internal compiler error: in find_valid_class, at reload.c:712 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. make[2]: *** [libgcc/./_fixdfdi.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [stmp-multilib] Error 2 make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 In addition to general hopefully benign warrnings reported via another PR, these seem more target specific than not, and may have contributed to the failure?: --- would seem that the code in varasm.c may be broken/fragile?: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c -o varasm.o ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c: In function `assemble_variable': ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:1699: warning: empty body in an if-statement ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c: In function `const_rtx_hash_1': ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:2843: warning: right shift count = width of type --- wouldn't expect a long double type to be referanced if not required by the target? gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include ../../gcc/gcc/alloc-pool.c -o alloc-pool.o ../../gcc/gcc/alloc-pool.c:48: warning: use of `long double' type; its size may change in a future release ../../gcc/gcc/alloc-pool.c:48: warning: (Long double usage is reported only once for each file. ../../gcc/gcc/alloc-pool.c:48: warning: To disable this warning, use -Wno-long-double.) gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include ../../gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c -o ggc-page.o ../../gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c:208: warning: use of `long double' type; its size may change in a future release ../../gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c:208: warning: (Long double usage is reported only once for each file. ../../gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c:208: warning: To disable this warning, use -Wno-long-double.) -- Summary: 4.0 build failure resulting in internal compiler error, not diagnostic. Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: schlie at comcast dot net CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0 GCC target triplet: avr-unknown-none http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18988
[Bug middle-end/18952] compiler internal error
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 15:47 --- Your testcase compiles without error with gcc 3.4 and the development build. On my pre-release of gcc-3.3.4 I get an unrecognized internal instruction, but no segmentation fault. I'd strongly recommend that you switch to using gcc 3.4 if you want Thumb code. A number of bugs have been fixed over previous releases. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Known to fail||3.3.4 Known to work||3.4.1 4.0.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 15:47:25 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18952
[Bug c/18988] 4.0 build failure resulting in internal compiler error, not diagnostic.
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-12-14 16:51 --- Subject: Re: 4.0 build failure resulting in internal compiler error, not diagnostic. From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 I don't know why someone asked you to file another bug but anyways, this is a dup of bug 18887. I basically agree, but you did? --- Additional Comment #6 From Andrew Pinski 2004-12-12 03:09 - Also could you file another bug for not rejecting the use of these modes because that seems like something which should have happened instead of the current ICE. Please attach the preprocessed source for libgcc2.c when compiling for _fixdfdi. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18988
[Bug c++/18981] [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_parser_lookup_name
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18981
[Bug fortran/18990] ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 17:20 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||accepts-invalid, ice- ||checking, ice-on-invalid- ||code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 17:20:31 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18990
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-14 15:49 --- Definitely a different problem than 18694. I'm looking at it now. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|18694 | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-14 17:33 --- This appears to be a bug in how we coalesce objects appearing in abnormal PHIs. [ We get abnormal PHIs because of the computed gotos. ] I've got a patch which appears to generate the right code for this testcase and I'll be testing today. I will (of course) post a more detailed analysis when I officially submit the patch. Jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug c++/18793] [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 17:46 --- Upon further reflection, I don't see a problem with what the gimplifier is doing, because it does not actually try to construct the S component in the temporary variable. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18793
[Bug target/18153] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -static-libgcc links in libunwind.so.7
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-14 17:52 --- Mark, can you take a look at the patch? Thanks. -- What|Removed |Added CC||mark at codesourcery dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18153
[Bug fortran/18991] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data with character array pointer.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 17:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15809 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18991
[Bug fortran/15809] ICE Using Pointer Functions
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 17:53 --- *** Bug 18991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15809
[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code
--- Additional Comments From atul dot sabharwal at tek dot com 2004-12-14 17:53 --- This bug is fixed in 3.4.1 version of gcc. I received a cross compiled version of gcc for MPC8540 platform with the 3.4.1 gcc based tool chain and all busybox apps work correctly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18912
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-14 17:55 --- BTW, it's pretty easy now that I've sat down and analyzed this test to see that my tree-ssa-dom.c patch from yesterday to fix pr18694 merely masked this bug (pr1) on Darwin. As I mentioned earlier today, pr1 is a problem in how we handle coalescing and abnormal edges and is going to be very sensitive to the precise order in which we decide to coalesce objects. Yesterday's tree-ssa-dom.c patch for 18694 can very easily change coalescing orderings and thus could easily mask this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug middle-end/18951] Invalid code generated by expand_errno_check
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 18:05 --- Subject: Bug 18951 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 18:04:56 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog builtins.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20041213-1.c Log message: PR middle-end/18951 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_mathfn, expand_builtin_mathfn_2, expand_builtin_mathfn_3): Avoid using arguments passed to save_expr after that call. * gcc.c-torture/execute/20041213-1.c: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=2.6824r2=2.6825 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/builtins.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.409r2=1.410 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4752r2=1.4753 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20041213-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18951
[Bug fortran/18993] gfortran fails to recognise comment line.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 18:34 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 18:34:09 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
[Bug target/18994] New: storage class in debugging strings
Some debugging information for AIX contains the storage class suffix because it is not stripped by strip_name_encoding. See libgfortran/io/transfer.c for example. -- Summary: storage class in debugging strings Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-debug Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: *-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-* GCC target triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18994
[Bug rtl-optimization/18992] delete_trivially_dead_insns made ineffective for two-address targets
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18995 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18992
[Bug middle-end/18951] Invalid code generated by expand_errno_check
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 18:12 --- Subject: Bug 18951 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 18:12:32 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog builtins.c gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20041213-1.c Log message: PR middle-end/18951 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_mathfn, expand_builtin_mathfn_2): Avoid using arguments passed to save_expr after that call. * gcc.c-torture/execute/20041213-1.c: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branchr1=2.2326.2.733r2=2.2326.2.734 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/builtins.c.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branchr1=1.275.2.4r2=1.275.2.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branchr1=1.3389.2.323r2=1.3389.2.324 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20041213-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18951
[Bug rtl-optimization/18995] New: delete_trivially_dead_insns fails to update the liveness information
When a register is set outside of a loop and referenced inside, update_life_info can't figure out that the set is dead because the loop appears to still use the register according to the lifeness information which is propagated circularily around the loop. delete_trivially_dead_insns can detect that such sets are dead, and thus remove them. However, it does not update the liveness information. This leads to a checking ICE when doing the next global update. The gcc 3.2 version of this patch (short version) for this problem looks like this: 2004-05-17 Jorn Rennecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] * cse.c (basic-block.h): #include. (trivially_dead_nonlocal_regs): New variable. (note_dead_set): New function. (delete_trivially_dead_insns): If life info is available, update it. The patch in its current form is conceptually dependent on the patch for gcc/18992 being applied first and also has some bits to support highpart liveness information optimizations. It is about 100 lines of unidiff. If someone is prepared to review the patch, I can extract an independent patch against the then-current mainline. -- Summary: delete_trivially_dead_insns fails to update the liveness information Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org BugsThisDependsOn: 18992 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18995
[Bug libgcj/18996] java.util.zip giving corrupt data or throwing ZipException on correct archives
--- Additional Comments From nlite at users dot sf dot net 2004-12-14 19:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7742) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7742action=view) a testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18996
[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2004-12-14 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=7740) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7740action=view) requested config.log from failed compile taken from /usr/src/gcc-3.4.3-objdir/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18889
[Bug libgcj/18996] java.util.zip giving corrupt data or throwing ZipException on correct archives
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:14 --- It works on ppc-darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18996
[Bug libgcj/18996] java.util.zip giving corrupt data or throwing ZipException on correct archives
--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-14 19:27 --- Works on win32 for me. gcc version 4.0.0 20041213 (experimental) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18996
[Bug libgcj/18996] java.util.zip giving corrupt data or throwing ZipException on correct archives
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:26 --- This also works on x86-linux. One way I think it could fail on Windows is if the zip contains extended time stamps and we try to load some locale data and can't find it. This might cause the failure, though I'm not sure. Can you get a more complete stack trace somehow? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18996
[Bug c++/18279] [4.0 regression] missing function bodies from -fdump-translation-unit
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:42 --- This is a low-priority issue. -- What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18279
[Bug libgcj/18996] java.util.zip giving corrupt data or throwing ZipException on correct archives
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:35 --- So this is already fixed, so closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18996
[Bug fortran/18998] Gfortran produces wrong output (c/f to g77)
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:40 --- This works for me on ppc-darwin with gcc 4.0.0 (20041214). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18998
[Bug java/17231] verification error 3.4.1/3.5 : compile .class with embedded try blocks
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:17 --- FYI, this will only work with the new verifier, which is only available via -findirect-dispatch. The new verifier doesn't yet work with the old ABI, AFAIK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17231
[Bug middle-end/18965] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_init_ctor_eval
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:13 --- Subject: Bug 18965 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 20:13:16 Modified files: gcc/cp : init.c ChangeLog gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init: array17.C Log message: 2004-12-14 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR c++/18965 * init.c (build_zero_init): If the max_index is 0, there is no need to create a RANGE_EXPR. 2004-12-14 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR c++/18965 * g++.dg/init/array17.C: New test. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/init.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.404r2=1.405 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4534r2=1.4535 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4755r2=1.4756 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array17.C.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965
[Bug middle-end/18999] New: gimplify_init_ctor_eval does not support RANGE_EXPRs
Even though the C++ front-end no longer produces RANGE_EXPR which would cause an ICE. I think we should support RANGE_EXPR in gimplify_init_ctor_eval. -- Summary: gimplify_init_ctor_eval does not support RANGE_EXPRs Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18999
[Bug middle-end/18951] Invalid code generated by expand_errno_check
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:31 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18951
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-14 20:07 --- Should be fixed with today's checkin to tree-outof-ssa.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:29 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug middle-end/18931] jar - .so optimization problem
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:16 --- I got this to fail with yesterday's cvs head. Removing the -O2 is a workaround. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18931
[Bug c++/18793] [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 19:40 --- Fixed in GCC 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18793
[Bug c++/18738] [3.4/4.0 Regression] typename not allowed with non-dependent qualified name
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18738
[Bug middle-end/18965] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_init_ctor_eval
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 20:15 --- Fixed by the C++ patch, I filed PR 18999 for the possible middle-end bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965
[Bug fortran/18943] more than quadratic compile-time behavior with many arithmetic if statements
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 22:09 --- The quadraticness is in the handling of labels, so this is the same as PR18937 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18937 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18943
[Bug libstdc++/18997] New: Segmentation Violation in pthread_getspecific
#include locale
#include iostream
Simple programs like the one below fail with segmentation faults. It happens
with locales and streams, and probably others, when they are created statically.
g++ is from a recent CVS.
static const std::locale l;
//static std::ostream o = std::cerr;
int main(const int,
const char * const * const)
{
return 0;
}
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 McKelvey-PC 1.5.12(0.116/4/2) 2004-11-10 08:34 i686 unknown unknow
n Cygwin
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/specs
Configured with: /home/User/cvsroot/gcc/configure --verbose --enable-threads
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-nls --enable-languages=c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20041209 (experimental)
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/cc1plus.exe -E -quiet -v
-D__CYGWIN32__ -D__CYGWIN__ -Dunix -D__unix__ -D__unix -idirafter
/usr/lib/../include/w32api -idirafter
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../../include/w32api test.cc
-mtune=pentiumpro -fpch-preprocess -o test.ii
ignoring nonexistent directory NONE/include
ignoring nonexistent directory
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/include
ignoring duplicate directory
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../../include/w32api
#include ... search starts here:
#include ... search starts here:
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/i686-pc-cygwin
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/backward
/usr/local/include
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/include
/usr/include
/usr/lib/../include/w32api
End of search list.
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/cc1plus.exe -fpreprocessed test.ii
-quiet -dumpbase test.cc -mtune=pentiumpro -auxbase test -version -o test.s
GNU C++ version 4.0.0 20041209 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.0 20041209 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
as -o test.o test.s
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/collect2.exe -Bdynamic
--dll-search-prefix=cyg -o test.exe /lib/crt0.o
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.0.0/../../.. test.o -lstdc++ -lgcc
-lcygwin -luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lgcc
This is what gdb reports just prior to the fault:
Breakpoint 2, 0x00405ec0 in pthread_getspecific ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00405ec0 in pthread_getspecific ()
#1 0x0040528d in _Unwind_SjLj_Register (fc=0x22eee8)
at /home/User/cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gthr-posix.h:496
#2 0x00430f26 in std::ios_base::Init::Init() ()
#3 0x004010a9 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) ()
#4 0x0040 in _GLOBAL__I_main ()
#5 0x61004918 in getprogname () from /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll
#6 0x61118080 in cygwin1!__cygwin_user_data ()
#7 0x0022ef78 in ?? ()
#8 0x610064fb in cygwin1!__main () from /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb)
$ less test.exe.stackdump
Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=00405EC5
eax=000B ebx=00438ED4 ecx=77E75A91 edx=0043A168 esi=00438ED0 edi=61118100
ebp=0022EE78 esp=0022EE6D program=C:\cygwin\home\User\PD\test.exe, pid 4024, thr
ead main
cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs= ss=0023
Stack trace:
Frame Function Args
6 [main] test 4024 handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state (probably
corrupted stack)
test.exe.stackdump (END)
The gdb is the one delivered with cygwin (along with gcc 3.4.1), so it may not
be entirely trustworthy for 4.0.
--
Summary: Segmentation Violation in pthread_getspecific
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18997
[Bug libfortran/18983] can't open /dev/null as an output file
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 22:14:31 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18983
[Bug fortran/18937] quadratic behaviour with many label spaghetti code
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 22:09 --- *** Bug 18943 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18937
[Bug ada/18660] ACATS spurious front-end error c432003.adb:134:21: too few discriminants given in constraint
--- Additional Comments From chrisp_42 at bigpond dot com 2004-12-14 22:17 --- This test has recently started passing on x86-linux: gcc version 4.0.0 20041213 (experimental) === acats Summary === # of expected passes2307 # of unexpected failures15 *** FAILURES: c32001e c380004 c43214c c52011a c64105b c95086b c953002 c953003 c980002 cc1221d cd10002 cd2b11a cd2b11b cdd2a02 cxa5012 Not sure exactly which patch corrected this, but it has been ok for 2 days now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18660
[Bug fortran/18998] Gfortran produces wrong output (c/f to g77)
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 22:29 --- I'm seeing the same result as Deji on i686-pc-linux. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ gfortran --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20041210 (experimental)) Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran under the terms of the GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 22:29:23 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18998
[Bug fortran/18923] segfault after subroutine name confusion
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 22:35:13 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18923
[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support the co-array f95 extension in gfortran
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 22:33 --- Do you have a link to something documenting this feature. I for one have never heard of it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
[Bug target/17990] [3.4/4.0 Regression] sse used for negate without -mfpmath=sse
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 22:45 --- Subject: Bug 17990 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 22:45:29 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i386-protos.h i386.c i386.h i386.md predicates.md Log message: PR target/17990 * config/i386/i386.c (x86_use_bt): New. (ix86_expand_unary_operator): Use MEM_P. (ix86_expand_fp_absneg_operator): New. * config/i386/i386.h (x86_use_bt): Declare. (TARGET_USE_BT): New. * config/i386/i386-protos.h: Update. * config/i386/i386.md (negsf2): Use ix86_expand_fp_absneg_operator. (negdf2, negxf2, abssf2, absdf2, absxf2): Likewise. (negsf2_memory, negsf2_ifs, negsf2_if, negdf2_memory, negdf2_ifs, negdf2_ifs_rex64, negdf2_if, negdf2_if_rex64, negxf2_if, abssf2_memory, abssf2_ifs, abssf2_if, absdf2_memory, absdf2_ifs, absdf2_ifs_rex64, absdf2_if, absxf2_if): Remove. (absnegsf2_mixed, absnegsf2_sse, absnegsf2_i387, absnegdf2_mixed, absnegdf2_sse, absnegdf2_i387, absnegxf2_i387): New. Merge all neg and abs splitters. Handle DFmode in general regs in 64-bit mode. (negextendsfdf2, absextendsfdf2): Disable for non-mixed sse math. (btsq, btrq, btcq): New. Add peepholes as well. (movv4sf_internal splitter): Postpone til after reload. (movv2di_internal splitter): Likewise. * config/i386/predicates.md (const_0_to_63_operand): New. (absneg_operator): New. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=2.6829r2=2.6830 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.121r2=1.122 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.752r2=1.753 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.h.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.406r2=1.407 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.md.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.573r2=1.574 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.8r2=1.9 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17990
[Bug middle-end/18424] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed.
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-14 23:20 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed. ericw at evcohs dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, unfortunately not as of yesterday, since reload.c was tweaked last week. Please file a separate bug report about this ASAP. It was already opened: PR 18887 Giovanni Bajo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18424
[Bug tree-optimization/18888] [4.0 regression] loops miscompiled
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-14 23:27 --- Patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01070.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
[Bug rtl-optimization/19001] New: Loops with power of two step and variable bounds not unrolled
Loop of the following form
int check(int a,int b, char *c)
{
for(;ab;a+=4)
if(c[a]==1) return a;
return a;
}
(with step being power of two and 1, and bounds variable) does not get
unrolled.
It may happen that this loop is infinite, but this should not prevent unrolling.
--
Summary: Loops with power of two step and variable bounds not
unrolled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19001
[Bug target/19000] New: [4.0 regression] ICE with -O and -O -fPIC
With gcc 4.0 checked out from CVS at Tue Dec 14 20:32:34 UTC 2004, I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ cat foo.c
static int i;
int bar;
static __thread void *foo [32 / sizeof (void *)]
__attribute__ ((tls_model (initial-exec)))
= { i, bar };
void
test1 (void)
{
unsigned int s;
for (s = 0; s sizeof (foo) / sizeof (void *); ++s)
{
foo [s] = foo[s];
}
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ /usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc foo.c -O -S
foo.c: In function \u\u\utest1\u\u\u:
foo.c:14: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 53 21 46 0 (set (reg/f:SI 67 [ D.1152 ])
(const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI (foo) [flags 0x1a] var_decl
0xb7d5ea6c foo)
(const_int 32 [0x20] -1 (nil)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI (foo) [flags 0x1a]
var_decl 0xb7d5ea6c foo)
(const_int 32 [0x20])))
(nil)))
foo.c:14: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2020
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ /usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc foo.c -O -S -fPIC
foo.c: In function \u\u\utest1\u\u\u:
foo.c:14: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 56 55 48 0 (set (reg/f:SI 69 [ D.1152 ])
(plus:SI (plus:SI (unspec:SI [
(const_int 0 [0x0])
] 15)
(reg:SI 78))
(const_int 32 [0x20]))) -1 (insn_list:REG_DEP_TRUE 55 (nil))
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 78)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI (foo) [flags
0x1a] var_decl 0xb7d5ea6c foo)
(const_int 32 [0x20])))
(nil
foo.c:14: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2020
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
--
Summary: [4.0 regression] ICE with -O and -O -fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19000
[Bug c++/18738] [3.4/4.0 Regression] typename not allowed with non-dependent qualified name
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 00:42 --- Subject: Bug 18738 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 00:42:36 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse: friend2.C gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c parser.c Added files: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template: typename8.C Log message: PR c++/18738 * decl.c (make_typename_type): Do not handle namespace-scoped names here. (tag_name): Handle typename_type. (check_elaborated_type_specifier): Handle typenames. * parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose_invalid_type_name): Improve comment. (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier): Use cp_parser_diagnose_invalid_type_name. PR c++/18738 * g++.dg/template/typename8.C: New test. * g++.dg/parse/friend2.C: Tweak error message. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4757r2=1.4758 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename8.C.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=NONEr2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/friend2.C.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.1r2=1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.4535r2=1.4536 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.1340r2=1.1341 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.294r2=1.295 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18738
[Bug c++/18738] [3.4 Regression] typename not allowed with non-dependent qualified name
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 01:50 --- Reopening, just for 3.4. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | Summary|[3.4/4.0 Regression]|[3.4 Regression] typename |typename not allowed with |not allowed with non- |non-dependent qualified name|dependent qualified name http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18738
[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support the co-array f95 extension in gfortran
--- Additional Comments From mg_gentoo at yahoo dot com 2004-12-15 02:52 --- The available information on it is, admittedly, a bit dispersed, but I think http://www.co-array.org/caf_def.htm might be close enough to what you are looking for. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
[Bug ada/19002] GNAT BUG DETECTED, unqualified record aggregate triggers
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2004-12-15 03:18 --- The offending(?) line is in the procedure Space_Info.mark, I should have said, in the procedure mark in the protected body of the Space_Info's Map type. Sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19002
[Bug target/14981] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE in _mm_xor_pd for SSE2 with -O1
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 04:09 --- We should not ice, indeed, but the comment #18 test case -- with -msse but not -msse2 -- is invalid. We should have stopped earlier, saying that v2df is not available with sse1 only. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14981
[Bug other/17444] lots of gcov failures with --enable-mapped-location
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 04:48 --- This actually has been fixed for a while now. Since Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:34:14 -0400. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17444
[Bug libgcj/14670] [win32] gcj high ascii: incorrectly translated / linux: fails to compile
--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-12-15 04:59 --- It isn't a compiling problem that I'm trying to illustrate. TestD.java (included above) has a line: String s = high ascii chars characters.If these characters were received over a network connection as a byte stream, they would still be converted to a string via the new String(byte[]) method, which is used in TestD.java. They would then be turned into a String, and displayed, as in the screenshot attached above. gcj doesn't seem to convert the characters properly (not in the same was a sun's java anyway). The testcase and screenshot hopefully communicate what I mean. Anyway, compiling to bytecode is separate issue: gcc version 4.0.0 20041213 (experimental) gcj -C --encoding=UTF-8 TestD.java TestD.java:12: error: malformed UTF-8 character. String s = #9617;ñâRÇÇNÇåñ#9617;; gcj -C --encoding=ISO-8859-1 TestD.java TestD.java:1: fatal error: unknown encoding: 'ISO-8859-1' This might mean that your locale's encoding is not supported by your system's iconv(3) implementation. If you aren't trying to use a particular encoding for your input file, try the '--encoding=UTF-8' option compilation terminated. I have mingw msys iconv (GNU libiconv 1.8) on my system. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14670
[Bug c++/17242] Testsuite fails due to duplicate symbols
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 05:11 --- Subject: Bug 17242 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 05:10:58 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog configure.ac configure config.in gcc/config/pa : pa-hpux10.h pa.c som.h Log message: PR c++/17242 * configure.ac: Add GAS check for HP-UX .nsubspa comdat. * configure, config.in: Rebuilt. * config/pa/pa-hpux10.h (SUPPORTS_ONE_ONLY, MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY): Delete defines. * config/pa/pa.c (pa_select_section): Allow uninitialized variables in one-only (comdat) subspaces. * config/pa/som.h (SUPPORTS_SOM_COMDAT): New define. (SUPPORTS_ONE_ONLY): True if SUPPORTS_WEAK or SUPPORTS_SOM_COMDAT are true. (MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY): Place uninitialized variables in common. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=2.6832r2=2.6833 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/configure.ac.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=2.88r2=2.89 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/configure.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.879r2=1.880 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config.in.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.200r2=1.201 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa-hpux10.h.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.22r2=1.23 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.c.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.279r2=1.280 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/pa/som.h.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.51r2=1.52 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17242
[Bug c++/18757] [3.4 Regression] ICE (on invalid) in get_innermost_template_args
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18757
[Bug c++/17242] Testsuite fails due to duplicate symbols
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15 05:49 --- Fixed by patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17242
[Bug bootstrap/18974] error in compiling gcc 4.0 for i686-pc-linux-gnu: gengtype-lex.c
--- Additional Comments From bbeck4gofls at hotmail dot com 2004-12-14 08:11 --- Thanks Andrew, There were two warnings before the earlier-mentioned error, saying bison and flex are missing on my system, but that they were only needed if I modified a .y or .l file. After emailing gcc-help I installed bison and flex, and tried compiling again, but kept getting errors referencing a missing 'lexer_line', when gcc was (I think in stage1) was trying to build build/gengtype from gengtype.o, gengtype-lex.o, gengtype-yacc.o, errors.o, and libiberty.a. Again, I'm using the 11-28-04 tarball, which is not a release, so it doesn't have gengtype-lex.c, but I just wanted to let the developers know not to forget it in the eventual release since I'm getting errors bootstrapping even with both bison and flex installed. I can give more information if you need it. Thanks! Brandon -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18974
[Bug middle-end/15486] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -fdata-sections moves common vars to .bss
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 08:21 --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00909.html -- What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15486
[Bug libstdc++/17789] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Cannot 'make check' inside libstdc++-v3
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 08:47 --- This is not critical according to the criteria. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17789
[Bug target/14981] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE in _mm_xor_pd for SSE2 with -O1
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 08:52 --- A bug involving SSE intrinsics is not critical. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14981
[Bug middle-end/18882] [3.3/3.4 Regression] wrong results with complex long double
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 09:34 --- Investigating. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18882
[Bug middle-end/18882] [3.3/3.4 Regression] wrong results with complex long double
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 09:35 --- This is the same problem as PR middle-end/14988. I'll backport the fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18882
[Bug target/18713] Large program size due to uninitialised global data
--- Additional Comments From bygoh at genting dot com dot my 2004-12-14 10:03 --- Have been trying to upgrade to a newer version of gcc (3.3.3 and above). But I am getting an error during compilation: checking whether the C compiler ( /usr/byg/src/bld-gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/byg/src/b ld-gcc/gcc/ -B/usr/local/gcc-3.3.4/i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5/bin/ -B/usr/local/gcc-3. 3.4/i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gcc-3.3.4/i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5 /include -O2 -O2 ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot creat e executables. gmake: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 Any idea how to get past this? Configured and built with: $ configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-3.3.4 --enable-languages=c++ $ gmake CFLAGS=-O2 LANGUAGES=c c++ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18713
[Bug fortran/18977] New: LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults
I was running the LAPACK with -O3 with 20041212 (snapshot) with Steve Kargl's I/O patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00844.html applied. The test ran OK until xeigtsts segfaulted: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/zfkts/zfkts/LAPACK/TESTING' Testing REAL LAPACK linear equation routines ./xlintsts stest.in stest.out 21 NEP: Testing Nonsymmetric Eigenvalue Problem routines ./xeigtsts nep.in snep.out 21 SEP: Testing Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem routines ./xeigtsts sep.in ssep.out 21 SVD: Testing Singular Value Decomposition routines ./xeigtsts svd.in ssvd.out 21 SEC: Testing REAL Eigen Condition Routines ./xeigtsts sec.in sec.out 21 make[1]: *** [sec.out] Error 139 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/zfkts/zfkts/LAPACK/TESTING' make: *** [testing] Error 2 $ gdb ./xeigtsts GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.1post-1.20040607.17rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as ia64-redhat-linux-gnu...Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) r sec.in Starting program: /home/zfkts/zfkts/LAPACK/TESTING/xeigtsts sec.in Tests of the Nonsymmetric eigenproblem condition estimation routines SLALN2, SLASY2, SLANV2, SLAEXC, STRSYL, STREXC, STRSNA, STRSEN, SLAQTR Relative machine precision (EPS) = 0.119209E-06 Safe minimum (SFMIN) = 0.117549E-37 Routines pass computational tests if test ratio is less than 20.00 SEC routines passed the tests of the error exits ( 35 tests done) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. slasy2_ (ltranl=Variable ltranl is not available. ) at slasy2.f:362 362 TMP( K ) = TMP( K ) - ( TEMP*T16( K, J ) )*TMP( J ) Current language: auto; currently fortran (gdb) p tmp $1 = (0, -nan(0x7f6f34), 10797277, -1437623.12) Reverting Steve's patch, bubblestrapping and rerunning it made no difference. This is a regression from about a month ago, and possibly a target problem. -- Summary: LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18977
[Bug c/18978] New: Segmentation fault after a warning about 'struct sigaction'
Command line and compiler output : -- gcc -c -Wall -ansi -DGnu -g -DDETECT_BUGS -v -save-temps -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/global/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/commun_c/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/param_ctrl_donnee/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/gst_don_mad/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/libmadona/Sun/inc -I/usr/dt/include -o /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/obj/diss_stat.o /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/src/diss_stat.c Reading specs from /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.2/configure --prefix=/opt/GNU/gcc/3.4.2 Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.2 /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/cc1 -E -quiet -v -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/global/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/commun_c/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/param_ctrl_donnee/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/gst_don_mad/inc -I/picsou2/users/hingrez/libmadona/Sun/inc -I/usr/dt/include -iprefix /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/ -DGnu -DDETECT_BUGS /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/src/diss_stat.c -mcpu=v7 -ansi -Wall -fworking-directory -o diss_stat.i ignoring nonexistent directory /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include ignoring duplicate directory /opt/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/include ignoring nonexistent directory /opt/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include #include ... search starts here: #include ... search starts here: /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/inc /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/global/inc /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/commun_c/inc /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/param_ctrl_donnee/inc /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/gst_don_mad/inc /picsou2/users/hingrez/libmadona/Sun/inc /usr/dt/include /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/include /usr/local/include /opt/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/include /usr/include End of search list. /picsou2/GNU/gcc/3.4.2/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.2/cc1 -fpreprocessed diss_stat.i -quiet -dumpbase diss_stat.c -mcpu=v7 -ansi -auxbase-strip /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/obj/diss_stat.o -g -Wall -ansi -version -o diss_stat.s GNU C version 3.4.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) compiled by GNU C version 3.4.2. GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 In file included from /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/src/diss_stat.c:60: /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/global/inc/Gst_File_Sig.h:102: warning: struct sigaction declared inside parameter list /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/global/inc/Gst_File_Sig.h:102: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/src/diss_stat.c: In function `main': /picsou2/users/hingrez/mercatorII/diffusion/src/diss_stat.c:259: internal compiler error: Segmentation Fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. *** Error code 1 Preprocessed file : --- How can I include it ?!? -- Summary: Segmentation fault after a warning about 'struct sigaction' Product: gcc Version: 3.4.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: patrick dot hingrez at atosorigin dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18978
[Bug middle-end/18424] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed.
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-12-14 12:33 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed. Nope, unfortunately not as of yesterday, since reload.c was tweaked last week. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18424
[Bug pch/18980] -MD doesn't report compiled headers as dependencies when using pch ?
--- Additional Comments From trick at icculus dot org 2004-12-14 12:52 --- This only affects precompiled headers. Continuing from before: $ echo '#define TEST2' test2.h $ echo '#include test2.h' test.c $ cat test.c #include test.h #include test2.h $ gcc -MD -MF test.c.d -c test.c $ cat test.c.d test.o: test.c test2.h ^ missing test.h (since test.h.gch exists and is used), but not test2.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18980
[Bug c++/18981] New: [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_parser_lookup_name
$ cat tree.cc
template class T
struct tree {
struct iterator;
struct sibling_iterator {
friend struct treeT::iterator;
};
};
$ gcc tree.cc
tree.cc:5: internal compiler error: tree check: expected typename_type, have
record_type in cp_parser_lookup_name, at cp/parser.c:14210
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
--
Summary: [4.0 regression] ICE in cp_parser_lookup_name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: schwab at suse dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18981
[Bug pch/14933] missing pre-compiled header depends with -MD
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 13:18 --- *** Bug 18980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||trick at icculus dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14933
[Bug libfortran/18982] New: open(status=new) does not generate an error if the file exists
$ cat open.f90 nout = 10 open(nout, file=foo.dat, status=new) close(nout) open(nout, file=foo.dat, status=new,err=100) ! This should fail write(nout,*) Hello ! and not this. 100 continue end $ rm -f foo.dat $ gfortran open.f90 $ ./a.out At line 5 of file open.f90 Fortran runtime error: Cannot write to file opened for READ -- Summary: open(status=new) does not generate an error if the file exists Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18982
[Bug c++/18975] Copying objects with mutable non-static data members
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14
13:25 ---
XYZ (PTR p) : ptr(p) {}
That will always call the constructor for ptr so this is invalid.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution||INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18975
[Bug target/18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 13:58 --- PR18542 and this PR are not identical: Proof: * Compiling the example from comment #3 # m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68020 -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c pr18549.c: In function `foo': pr18549.c:31: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand # m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68000 -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c [No ICE] * Compling the example from PR18542: # m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68000 -O2 -o tmp.o -c cpuboot.c cpuboot.c: In function `boot_phase_1': cpuboot.c:8: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand # m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -m68020 -O2 -o tmp.o -c cpuboot.c cpuboot.c: In function `boot_phase_1': cpuboot.c:8: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand = The ICE from the example in PR15492 is independent of -m68020 Furthermore, no ICE occurs for the example from comment #3 with avr-*: # avr-rtems4.7-gcc -O2 -o tmp.o -c pr18549.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592
[Bug target/17990] [3.4/4.0 Regression] sse used for negate without -mfpmath=sse
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-12-14 14:09 --- In response to comment #30: it is libpthread's responsibility to align the stack of subthreads properly. It doesn't do that, however, but I believe that we have another PR for that (this is something that we can't really do anything about, however). If Uros' first testcase now works, then I think we have fixed the part that we could fix, so I'm closing the PR. Eric, if there are more problems, please open another PR and have a link in it to this PR. Thanks Wolfgang -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17990
[Bug bootstrap/18972] Regression: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.0-20041212 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1): Bootstrap comparison failure
--- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de 2004-12-14 13:46 --- Well next time I better read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html thoroughly instead of just banking on the word of irc instead: It had to be 'BOOT_CFLAGS' instead of 'BOOTCFLAGS' of course. Anyway, surprisingly 'make bootstrap STAGE1_CFLAGS=-no-cpp-precomp -Wa,-force_cpusubtype_ALL BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -save-temps' worked flawlessly - no Bootstrap comparison failure any more. I also came to know that '-save-temps' doesn't save the .i and .s files in the stageX directories but just in the gcc directory (so the stage2 .i and .s files would get erased by a bootstrap or bubblestrap) So I started over like this: cd GCC/FSF/gcc-build/ rm -rf * ../gcc-4.0-20041212/configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc make bootstrap STAGE1_CFLAGS=-no-cpp-precomp -Wa,-force_cpusubtype_ALL cd gcc redoing stage 2 (note the additional '-fomit-frame-pointer' (which I omitted in the first place too ;-))): touch ../../gcc-4.0-20041212/gcc/reload.c make restage2 BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer -save-temps now I moved reload.i and reload.s into a safe place and then redoing stage 3: touch ../../gcc-4.0-20041212/gcc/reload.c make restage3 BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer -save-temps then I saved the other reload.i and reload.s too The comparison of all stage2 vs. stage3 files yieled absolutelly no difference (even the .o files are similar) Heisenbug? Next thing I'll do is a clean 'make bootstrap STAGE1_CFLAGS=-no-cpp-precomp -Wa,-force_cpusubtype_ALL BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer' and then again the same with '-save-temps' added to see which (if?) one of those fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18972
[Bug middle-end/18424] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed.
--- Additional Comments From ericw at evcohs dot com 2004-12-14 14:18 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed. On 14 Dec 2004 at 12:33, schlie at comcast dot net wrote: --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-12-14 12:33 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] ~6x+ performance regression, constant trees not being computed. Nope, unfortunately not as of yesterday, since reload.c was tweaked last week. Please file a separate bug report about this ASAP. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18424
[Bug c++/18975] Copying objects with mutable non-static data members
--- Additional Comments From wolfgang dot roehrl at de dot gi-de dot com 2004-12-14 14:19 --- Subject: Antwort: Copying objects with mutable non-static data members Hi all, I'm responding to Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 13:57 (bug 18975): I just tried the code fragment with the Comeau online compiler. The compiler does generate implicitly the copy contructor but it refuses to generate implicitly the copy assignment operator. That means the Comeau compiler translates the mentioned code fragment if line 20 is un-commented, i.e. if we have an user-defined copy assignment operator. But it is not necessary to un-comment line 19, i.e. we don't need an user-defined copy constructor. Regards, W. Roehrl -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18975
[Bug c/18715] [4.0 Regression] warning: enumeration value not handled in switch for '...' ranges
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 14:34 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01028.html. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18715
[Bug c++/18986] New: GCC Manual does not specify standard for C++
Section 2 of the GCC manual details the standards followed for each language supported by gcc. Notably absent is any reference for the C++ language. I assume the basic answer is ISO/IEC 14882-1998. What about Technical Corrigendum 1 (TC1) is that also supported? Further, I note that several DRs which are not part of TC1 are currently supported by 3.4.3 (for example DR45 and DR77). Since these DRs are at WP status, they are not officially part of the ISO standard. Therefore they should at least be seperately listed so that users and maintainers alike know what language is being supported. Better yet, a flag (ala C -ansi) should be available to disable DRs which are not part of the standard. -- Summary: GCC Manual does not specify standard for C++ Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: llewins at raytheon dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,llewins at raytheon dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18986
[Bug c++/18984] [4.0 regression] ICE in check_pointer_types_r
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 15:39 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01035.html. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18984
[Bug middle-end/18952] [3.3 only] compiler internal error
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|compiler internal error |[3.3 only] compiler internal ||error Target Milestone|--- |3.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18952
[Bug fortran/18977] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-12-14 16:06 --- My success with LAPACK is on i386-*-FreeBSD. LAPACK dies a horrible death on amd64-*-FreeBSD. Your segfault is a BUS ERROR for me. I believe this is a x86_64 target problem. -- steve -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18977
[Bug fortran/5900] [g77 gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-14 16:13 --- ... I forgot to add, on a ia64-unknown-linux-gnu running RedHat ES 3.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900
[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2004-12-14 16:24 --- Created an attachment (id=7741) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7741action=view) requested config.log from failed compile (in nof) taken from /usr/src/gcc-3.4.3-objdir/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/nof/libstdc++-v3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18889
[Bug target/18989] A few potentially ominous, and several likely harmless warnings during 4.0 build
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 16:51 --- This one cannot be fixed: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/build -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include \ -o build/gengtype-yacc.o gengtype-yacc.c /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `yyparse': /usr/share/bison.simple:614: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned /usr/share/bison.simple:626: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned The following is a target one: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c -o varasm.o ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c: In function `assemble_variable': ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:1699: warning: empty body in an if-statement ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c: In function `const_rtx_hash_1': ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:2843: warning: right shift count = width of type The long double bugs cannot be fixed, they are warnings only from the Apple's gcc. The warnings from gengtype cannot be fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|c |target Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-14 16:51:18 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18989
[Bug c/18989] New: A few potentially ominous, and several likely harmless warnings during 4.0 build
Warnings generated during a failed avr target build of 4.0 as of today, on a mac/dwawin-7.6 host which should likely be verified as being harmless, and then silenced if so. (sending the report just in case the build failure may be related to one of the more ominous warnings, and for reference: built via ../gcc/configure --target=avr --disable-nls --enable-languages=c ) [ other more target specific warnings/errors noted via PR:18988, and noted at the end ] --- don't know where the below should have been defined, but seems fragile?: gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing- prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o build/gengtype \ build/gengtype.o build/gengtype-lex.o build/gengtype-yacc.o \ build/errors.o ../build-powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0/libiberty/libiberty.a build/gengtype warning: structure `c_arg_info' used but not defined warning: structure `c_switch' used but not defined warning: structure `reorder_block_def' used but not defined warning: structure `et_node' used but not defined warning: structure `loop' used but not defined warning: structure `reg_info_def' used but not defined warning: structure `value_set' used but not defined warning: structure `alias_var_def' used but not defined warning: structure `c_arg_info' used but not defined warning: structure `c_switch' used but not defined warning: structure `reorder_block_def' used but not defined warning: structure `et_node' used but not defined warning: structure `loop' used but not defined warning: structure `reg_info_def' used but not defined warning: structure `value_set' used but not defined warning: structure `alias_var_def' used but not defined echo timestamp s-gtype --- the last two warnings below imply something's fragile?: gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/ libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:27: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c: In function `padding_token': ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:913: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c: In function `create_iso_definition': ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:1422: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type --- likely not a big deal, but would be nicer if verified/silenced: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/build -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include \ -o build/gengtype-yacc.o gengtype-yacc.c /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `yyparse': /usr/share/bison.simple:614: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned /usr/share/bison.simple:626: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned --- not a big deal, but would be nicer if prototypes were added to silence: gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/ libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/charset.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/charset.c:22: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/ libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/directives.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/directives.c:23: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/ libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/errors.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/errors.c:27: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/ libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include
[Bug c++/18975] Copying objects with mutable non-static data members
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 16:55 --- (In reply to comment #4) I can't tell what's being said here. IIUC, you're saying that Comeau (which uses the edg frontend) also rejects the code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18975
[Bug c++/18492] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware,HP-UX testsuite failure: g++.old-deja/g++.other/thunk1.C
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14
16:30 ---
Here is a reduced testcase at least for mmix:
struct X{ ~X(); };
struct B
{
virtual void a( X ) = 0;
};
struct D : public virtual B
{
void a( X );
};
void D::a( X ){};
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18492
A few potentially ominous, and several likely harmless warnings during 4.0 build
Warnings generated during a failed avr target build of 4.0 as of today, on a mac/dwawin-7.6 host which should likely be verified as being harmless, and then silenced if so. (sending the report just in case the build failure may be related to one of the more ominous warnings, and for reference: built via ../gcc/configure --target=avr --disable-nls --enable-languages=c ) [ other more target specific warnings/failures noted via another PR ] --- don't know where the below should have been defined, but seems fragile?: gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o build/gengtype \ build/gengtype.o build/gengtype-lex.o build/gengtype-yacc.o \ build/errors.o ../build-powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0/libiberty/libiberty.a build/gengtype warning: structure `c_arg_info' used but not defined warning: structure `c_switch' used but not defined warning: structure `reorder_block_def' used but not defined warning: structure `et_node' used but not defined warning: structure `loop' used but not defined warning: structure `reg_info_def' used but not defined warning: structure `value_set' used but not defined warning: structure `alias_var_def' used but not defined warning: structure `c_arg_info' used but not defined warning: structure `c_switch' used but not defined warning: structure `reorder_block_def' used but not defined warning: structure `et_node' used but not defined warning: structure `loop' used but not defined warning: structure `reg_info_def' used but not defined warning: structure `value_set' used but not defined warning: structure `alias_var_def' used but not defined echo timestamp s-gtype --- the last two warnings below imply something's fragile?: gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:27: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c: In function `padding_token': ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:913: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c: In function `create_iso_definition': ../../gcc/libcpp/macro.c:1422: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type --- likely not a big deal, but would be nicer if verified/silenced: gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE-I. -Ibuild -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/build -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include \ -o build/gengtype-yacc.o gengtype-yacc.c /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `yyparse': /usr/share/bison.simple:614: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned /usr/share/bison.simple:626: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned --- not a big deal, but would be nicer if prototypes were added to silence: gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/charset.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/charset.c:22: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/directives.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/directives.c:23: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/errors.c In file included from ../../gcc/libcpp/system.h:269, from ../../gcc/libcpp/errors.c:27: ../../gcc/include/libiberty.h:80: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype gcc -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I../../gcc/libcpp -I. -I../../gcc/libcpp/../include -I../../gcc/libcpp/include -c ../../gcc/libcpp/expr.c In file included
[Bug c/18988] 4.0 build failure resulting in internal compiler error, not diagnostic.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 16:40 --- I don't know why someone asked you to file another bug but anyways, this is a dup of bug 18887. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18887 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18988
[Bug middle-end/18887] [4.0 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 16:40 --- *** Bug 18988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887
[Bug fortran/18990] New: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c
The attached (invalid) code gives the following error message: parabrisas% gfortran -c -g core.f90 core.f90:12: internal compiler error: in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1399 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. (The code is invalid since MAX_BUFF_SIZE is undeclared.) This is using gcc cvs from yesterday: parabrisas% gfortran --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20041213 (experimental)) Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. parabrisas% cat core.f90 module core type, public :: buffer_t private character(len=MAX_BUFF_SIZE) :: str end type buffer_t private CONTAINS function buffer_to_str(buffer) result(a) type(buffer_t), intent(in) :: buffer integer :: a a = 1 end function buffer_to_str end module core -- Summary: ICE in gfc_get_derived_type, at fortran/trans-types.c Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18990
[Bug fortran/18991] New: ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data with character array pointer.
attached code fails with: parabrisas% gfortran -c -g bug3.F90 bug3.F90: In function 'de': bug3.F90:1: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_descriptor_data, at fortran/trans-array.c:183 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. parabrisas% cat bug3.F90 SUBROUTINE de( array ) character(len=*), dimension(:), pointer :: array logical :: a a = associated(array) END SUBROUTINE de This is probably related to PR 17202, but is not the same. (in this, the strings are assumed length, and the ICE is in a different routine.) -- Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data with character array pointer. Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18991
