[Bug middle-end/28160] New: Bogus size of array 'foo' is too large error with -mms-bitfields
Several g++ tests in tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1 fail during
the compilation with the error message like
error: size of array 'foo' is too large
with -mms-bitfields. A reduced testcase is
typedef long int along __attribute__((aligned (32)));
struct S
{
unsigned char a;
along d:130;
int e:66;
} A[1];
It looks the ms-bitfield code in stor-layout.c doesn't take
the bit field with excessive size into account and it makes
the negative remaining_in_alignment which causes the above
error.
--
Summary: Bogus size of array 'foo' is too large error with -
mms-bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28160
[Bug middle-end/28161] New: Wrong bit field layout with -mms-bitfields
Several g++ tests in tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1 fail with
the execution error. A reduced testcase is
extern C void abort (void);
struct S
{
long long d:23;
int e:32;
int f:32;
} a;
int main (void)
{
a.e = -3;
a.f = 1;
if (a.e != -3)
abort ();
return 0;
}
which shows that the current compiler allocates a.e and a.f in
an overlapped manner with -mms-bitfields. With that option,
the 4.1 compiler allocates a field in the first 8-byte for a.d,
the next 4-byte for a.e and the another 4-byte for a.f, but 4.2
allocates 23-bit for a.d, the next 32-bit for a.e and the last
32-bit for a.f in the same 8-byte.
--
Summary: Wrong bit field layout with -mms-bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161
[Bug target/28150] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:394
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-25 08:47 --- (In reply to comment #2) How did you configure GCC becase having TFmode there sounds like you configured to have 128bit long double to be default. $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/ppc-pld-linux/4.1.2/specs Target: ppc-pld-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --with-local-prefix=/usr/local --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --x-libraries=/usr/lib --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,ada,java --enable-c99 --enable-long-long --disable-multilib --enable-nls --disable-werror --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-demangler-in-ld --with-system-zlib --with-slibdir=/lib --without-system-libunwind --enable-cmath --with-long-double-128 --enable-secureplt --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.1.2 --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --with-qt4dir=/usr/lib/qt4 --disable-libjava-multilib --enable-libgcj --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-libgcj-database --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=qt,gtk,xlib --enable-jni --enable-xmlj --enable-alsa --enable-dssi ppc-pld-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.2 20060623 (prerelease) (PLD-Linux) glibc-2.4, kernel-2.6 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28150
[Bug c/28162] New: ice on valid code
I just tried to compile the attached source code with compiler flag -O3. GNU C compiler version 4.2 snapshot 20060624 said [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnu/42-20060617/bugs ~/gnu/42-20060624/results/bin/gcc -O3 bug18.c bug18.c: In function 'Speech_Encode_Frame_init': bug18.c:24528: warning: passing argument 1 of 'Speech_Encode_Frame_exit' from incompatible pointer type bug18.c: In function 'ol_ltp': bug18.c:19118: internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:157 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnu/42-20060624/bugs Preprocessed source code attached. Flag -O3 required. -- Summary: ice on valid code Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dcb314 at hotmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug c/28162] ice on valid code
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2006-06-25 09:28 --- Created an attachment (id=11744) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11744action=view) C source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug c/28162] ice on valid code
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 10:01 --- min is not less than max: (gdb) call debug_tree (min) integer_cst 0xa78f57b0 type integer_type 0xa7bf42e0 unsigned int constant invariant 4294966724 (gdb) call debug_tree (max) integer_cst 0xa7be2498 type integer_type 0xa7bf433c long int constant invariant 2147483647 but worse, their types don't match. (I guess the former wants to be casted to int) #1 0x086124ff in set_value_range (vr=0xaff5a110, t=VR_RANGE, min=0xa78f57b0, max=0xa7be2498, equiv=0x8a30dd8) at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:157 #2 0x08617d92 in adjust_range_with_scev (vr=0xaff5a110, loop=0x89f3980, stmt=0xa7966774, var=0xa700a1e0) at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:2090 #3 0x0861e035 in vrp_visit_assignment (stmt=0xa7966774, output_p=0xaff5a278) at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:3457 #4 0x0861f9a0 in vrp_visit_stmt (stmt=0xa7966774, taken_edge_p=0xaff5a27c, output_p=0xaff5a278) at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c:3850 (gdb) call debug_generic_expr (stmt) D.23941_257 = p_max1D.23874_118 * 0fffc mult_expr 0xa7966798 type integer_type 0xa7bf42e0 unsigned int public unsigned SI size integer_cst 0xa7be23f0 constant invariant 32 unit size integer_cst 0xa7be2180 constant invariant 4 align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 32 min integer_cst 0xa7be2468 0 max integer_cst 0xa7be2450 4294967295 pointer_to_this pointer_type 0xa7c94e60 arg 0 ssa_name 0xa7566e40 type integer_type 0xa7a5bcf0 Word32 sizes-gimplified public SI size integer_cst 0xa7be23f0 32 unit size integer_cst 0xa7be2180 4 align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 32 min integer_cst 0xa7be2480 -2147483648 max integer_cst 0xa7be2498 2147483647 pointer_to_this pointer_type 0xa7a60678 var var_decl 0xa7897898 p_max1 def_stmt modify_expr 0xa794fbf4 version 118 arg 1 integer_cst 0xa79a1be8 type integer_type 0xa7bf42e0 unsigned int constant invariant 4294967292 type mismatch in the MULT_EXPR (signed vs. unsigned). ol_ltpD.6288:: ;; basic block 10, loop depth 1, count 0 ;; prev block 17, next block 11 ;; pred: 67 (true,exec) ;; succ: 11 (true) 12 (false) L24:; p_max1_118 = ASSERT_EXPR p_max1_13, p_max1_13 19; D.23941_257 = p_max1_118 * 0fffc; D.23942_258 = (Float32 *) D.23941_257; D.23943_259 = D.23942_258 + corr[143]; ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug tree-optimization/28162] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:157
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 10:30 ---
Reduced testcase, still needs -O3 (and checking enabled):
void Lag_max_wght(float corr[], long wght_flg)
{
float t0, max;
const float *ww;
long i;
if ( wght_flg 0 ) {
for ( i = 143; i = 20; i-- ) {
t0 = corr[ - i] * *ww--;
if ( t0 = max )
max = t0;
}
}
}
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-06-25 10:30:15
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug tree-optimization/27937] [4.2 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure on Solaris 10/x86
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 10:58 --- Is there a testcase for this bug that can be examined on more common host/target systems? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27937
[Bug c++/28051] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on invalid conversion operator
--- Comment #3 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 11:07 --- Subject: Bug 28051 Author: lmillward Date: Sun Jun 25 11:07:05 2006 New Revision: 114985 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114985 Log: PR c++/28051 * mangle.c (mangle_conv_op_name_for_type): Check for invalid types. *name-lookup.c (push_class_level_binding): Robustify. (do_class_using_decl): Return early if name is error_mark_node. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/using13.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/mangle.c trunk/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28051
[Bug c++/28051] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE on invalid conversion operator
--- Comment #4 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 11:07 --- Fixed on mainline. -- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE|[4.0/4.1 regression] ICE on |on invalid conversion |invalid conversion operator |operator| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28051
[Bug c++/28054] [4.2 regression] ICE with friend declaration of invalid bitfield
--- Comment #1 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 11:28 --- Subject: Bug 28054 Author: lmillward Date: Sun Jun 25 11:28:01 2006 New Revision: 114986 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114986 Log: PR c++/28054 * decl2.c (grokbitfield): Remove check for grokdeclarator returning NULL_TREE, instead check for error_mark_node to indicate failure. * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Adjust block comment. * g++.dg/other/incomplete3.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/incomplete3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c trunk/gcc/cp/decl2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28054
[Bug c++/28054] [4.2 regression] ICE with friend declaration of invalid bitfield
--- Comment #2 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 11:28 --- Fixed. -- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28054
[Bug tree-optimization/28162] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:157
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 12:02 ---
.003.original is already wrong:
t0 = *((float *) (i * 0fffc) + corr) * (float) *ww-- ;
we ask fold to fold (unsigned)-i * 4U
which continues to ask fold to fold i * -4U (buggy already), which is from
case MULT_EXPR:
/* (-A) * (-B) - A * B */
if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == NEGATE_EXPR negate_expr_p (arg1))
return fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, type,
TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0),
negate_expr (arg1));
it should use fold_convert () on the args. The following fixes it:
Index: fold-const.c
===
--- fold-const.c(revision 114974)
+++ fold-const.c(working copy)
@@ -8866,12 +8866,12 @@ fold_binary (enum tree_code code, tree t
/* (-A) * (-B) - A * B */
if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == NEGATE_EXPR negate_expr_p (arg1))
return fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, type,
- TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0),
- negate_expr (arg1));
+ fold_convert (type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)),
+ fold_convert (type, negate_expr (arg1)));
if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == NEGATE_EXPR negate_expr_p (arg0))
return fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, type,
- negate_expr (arg0),
- TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0));
+ fold_convert (type, negate_expr (arg0)),
+ fold_convert (type, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0)));
if (! FLOAT_TYPE_P (type))
{
(obvious, but has to wait until after the summit.)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-06-25 10:30:15 |2006-06-25 12:02:00
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug fortran/28163] New: Calling libgfortran's copy_string is inefficient
Currently, string assignments are done via calls to _gfortran_copy_string,
which is a simple wrapper around memmove/memset:
void
copy_string (GFC_INTEGER_4 destlen, char * dest,
GFC_INTEGER_4 srclen, const char * src)
{
if (srclen = destlen)
{
/* This will truncate if too long. */
memmove (dest, src, destlen);
}
else
{
memmove (dest, src, srclen);
/* Pad with spaces. */
memset (dest[srclen], ' ', destlen - srclen);
}
}
With this implementation, AERMOD (from polyhedron benchmark) spends most of its
time in calls to memmove/memset. If the above code is directly emitted by the
front-end, I measure on i686-linux a 27% improvement in execution time with the
following options:
gfortran -march=pentium4 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 aermod.f90
--
Summary: Calling libgfortran's copy_string is inefficient
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28163
[Bug fortran/28163] Calling libgfortran's copy_string is inefficient
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 12:31 --- Created an attachment (id=11746) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11746action=view) Patch described in the bug report -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28163
[Bug target/27827] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3
--- Comment #17 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-06-25 13:17 --- OK, thanks for the reply. I will assume gcc 4 won't be fixed in the near future. My guess is this will make icc an easier compiler for users, which I kind of hate, which is why I worked as much as I did on this report . . . I hope you will consider adding the mmbench4s.tar.gz attachment above (the one that runs both single and double precision) to the gcc regression tests. Notice that it caught this problem between 3 and 4, as well as a similar fp performance drop between gcc 2 and 3 (bugzilla 4991). The kernel here is typical of those used in ATLAS, which is used by hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. I believe these kernels are also typical of pretty much any register blocked fp code, so having them in the regression tests may help other open source fp packages (eg, fftw, etc) as well. Notice that closed-source alternatives that ship binaries do not face this challenge, so that having the compiler drop between releases gives them an advantage, and can drive HPC users (where performance dictates everything) to proprietary solutions. Thanks, Clint -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827
[Bug c++/28164] New: g++ core when init a struct
using ACE 5.4.1
command line:g++ -I/usr/local/ACE_wrappers test.cpp
gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2)
source:
#include ace/INET_Addr.h
struct ERR
{
ACE_INET_Addr err[10][2]; /// right: int err[10][2]; or ACE_INET_Addr [10];
};
ERR temp = {0};
int main()
{
return 0;
}
--
Summary: g++ core when init a struct
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tiramisu dot xc at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28164
[Bug c++/28164] g++ core when init a struct
--- Comment #1 from tiramisu dot xc at gmail dot com 2006-06-25 13:38 --- Created an attachment (id=11747) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11747action=view) /tmp/cciuGwmP.out -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28164
[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 27554 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27554
[Bug fortran/25056] non-PURE function should not be a valid argument
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 25056 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25056
[Bug fortran/20874] elemental function ought to be scalar
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 20874 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20874
[Bug fortran/25073] CASEs overlap
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 25073 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25073
[Bug fortran/20867] statement function args not given implicit type early enough
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 20867 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20867
[Bug fortran/28119] forall_stmt ; stmt gives an internal error
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 28119 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28119
[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 22038 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25072
[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
--- Comment #21 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops I looked at the documentation for lshiftrt, but it doesn't say whether the shift amount range handled by the PA insn for variable shifts is ok or not. On the otherhand, there's no obvious reason why we should need to support logical right shifts larger than 31 bits and I have to wonder why the generated code does this. I looked at this a bit more and I believe that this behavior is normal when SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED is defined. The test doesn't fail with -fno-unroll-loops-all-loops. It appears to me that this is a loop unrolling rather than a loop invariant bug, although I must admit it's not clear where things actually go wrong because of the complexity of this operation. I modified the testcase a bit to make debugging easier. I've attached the modified testcase and the dumps from loop2_unroll, loop2_done, web and cse2. The initialization of count in the block after code_label 21 definitely appears wrong after cse2. I've also attached the final assembly code for reference. Dave --- Comment #22 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11748) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11748action=view) --- Comment #23 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11749) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11749action=view) --- Comment #24 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11750) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11750action=view) --- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11751) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11751action=view) --- Comment #26 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11752) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11752action=view) --- Comment #27 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-25 15:32 --- Created an attachment (id=11753) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11753action=view) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26244
[Bug tree-optimization/28162] [4.2 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:157
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|ICE in set_value_range, at |[4.2 Regression] ICE in |tree-vrp.c:157 |set_value_range, at tree- ||vrp.c:157 Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28162
[Bug c++/27821] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with invalid ptr-to-member
--- Comment #4 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:00 --- Subject: Bug 27821 Author: lmillward Date: Sun Jun 25 17:00:43 2006 New Revision: 114988 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114988 Log: PR c++/27821 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Return error_mark_node on invalid uses of the scope resolution operator. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error22.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27821
[Bug c++/27821] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with invalid ptr-to-member
--- Comment #5 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:05 --- Subject: Bug 27821 Author: lmillward Date: Sun Jun 25 17:05:22 2006 New Revision: 114989 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114989 Log: PR c++/27821 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Return error_mark_node on invalid uses of the scope resolution operator. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/error22.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/cp/decl.c branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27821
[Bug c++/27821] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with invalid ptr-to-member
--- Comment #6 from lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:06 --- Fixed in 4.1.2 and 4.0.4. -- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27821
[Bug middle-end/28151] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with complex math
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:16 --- Subject: Bug 28151 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sun Jun 25 17:16:25 2006 New Revision: 114992 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114992 Log: PR middle-end/28151 * fold-const.c (const_binop): Be prepared for self returning zero. Simplify code handling complex values. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20060625-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fold-const.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28151
[Bug middle-end/28151] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with complex math
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:18 --- Subject: Bug 28151 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sun Jun 25 17:18:00 2006 New Revision: 114993 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114993 Log: PR middle-end/28151 * fold-const.c (const_binop): Be prepared for self returning zero. Simplify code handling complex values. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20060625-1.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28151
[Bug middle-end/28151] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with complex math
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 17:19 --- Fixed everywhere. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28151
[Bug fortran/25056] non-PURE function should not be a valid argument
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 25056 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25056
[Bug fortran/20874] elemental function ought to be scalar
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 20874 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20874
[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 27554 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27554
[Bug fortran/20867] statement function args not given implicit type early enough
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 20867 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20867
[Bug fortran/25073] CASEs overlap
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 25073 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25073
[Bug fortran/28119] forall_stmt ; stmt gives an internal error
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 28119 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28119
[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 22038 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/25056 * interface.c (compare_actual_formal): Signal an error if the formal argument is a pure procedure and the actual is not pure. PR fortran/27554 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If the type of procedure passed as an actual argument is not already declared, see if it is an intrinsic. PR fortran/25073 * resolve.c (resolve_select): Use bits 1 and 2 of a new int to keep track of the appearance of constant logical case expressions. Signal an error is either value appears more than once. PR fortran/20874 * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Signal an error if an elemental function is not scalar valued. PR fortran/20867 * match.c (recursive_stmt_fcn): Perform implicit typing of variables. PR fortran/22038 * match.c (match_forall_iterator): Mark new variables as FL_UNKNOWN if the match fails. PR fortran/28119 * match.c (gfc_match_forall): Remove extraneous call to gfc_match_eos. PR fortran/25072 * resolve.c (resolve_code, resolve_function): Rework forall_flag scheme so that it is set and has a value of 2, when the code-expr (ie. the forall mask) is resolved. This is used to change block to mask in the non-PURE error message. 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/20867 * gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90: New test. PR fortran/25056 * gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/20874 * gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90: New test. PR fortran/25073 * gfortran.dg/select_7.f90: New test. PR fortran/27554 * intrinsic_actual_1.f: New test. PR fortran/22038 PR fortran/28119 * gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90: New test. PR fortran/25072 * gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_result_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_5.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_actual_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_1.f branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_7.f90 branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stfunc_3.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/match.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25072
[Bug fortran/25056] non-PURE function should not be a valid argument
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:09 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25056
[Bug fortran/20867] statement function args not given implicit type early enough
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:10 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20867
[Bug fortran/20874] elemental function ought to be scalar
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:11 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20874
[Bug fortran/25073] CASEs overlap
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:11 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25073
[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:12 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27554
[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:12 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038
[Bug fortran/28119] forall_stmt ; stmt gives an internal error
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:13 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28119
[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:13 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25072
[Bug c++/28164] g++ core when init a struct
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 19:55 --- Fixed in 4.0.0 -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28164
[Bug target/27827] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 20:05 --- Unfortunately we don't have infrastructure for performance regression tests. Btw. did you check what happens if you do not unroll the innermost loop manually but let -funroll-loops do it? For me the performance is the same (but I may have screwed up removing the unrolling). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827
[Bug middle-end/27950] [4.2 regression] undefined reference when compiling valgrind 3.2.0
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-06-25 23:05:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27950
[Bug middle-end/27889] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on complex assignment in nested function
--- Comment #14 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-06-26 00:24 --- The problem appears to be that DECL_COMPLEX_GIMPLE_REG_P is not getting set on the declarations correctly. The VAR_DECLs that are operands to the additions don't have DECL_COMPLEX_GIMPLE_REG_P set, so fail the is_gimple_val check in verify_stmts. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27889
[Bug target/27827] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3
--- Comment #19 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-06-26 00:55 --- Thanks for the info. I'm sorry to hear that no performance regression tests are done, but I guess it kind of explains why these problems reoccur :) As to not unrolling, the fully unrolled case is almost always commandingly better whenever I've looked at it. After your note, I just tried on my P4, using ATLAS's P4 kernel, and I get (ku is inner loop unrolling, and nb=40, so 40 is fully unrolled): GCC 4 ku=1 : 1.65Gflop GCC 4 ku=40 : 1.84Gflop Gcc 3 ku=1 : 1.90Gflop Gcc 3 ku=40: 2.19Gflop This is throwing the -funroll-loops flag. BTW, gcc 4 w/o the -funroll-loops (ku=1) is indeed slower, at roughly 1.54 . . . Anyway, I've never found the performance of gcc ku=1 competitive with ku=fully unrolled on any machine. Even in assembly, I have to fully unroll the inner loop to get near peak on all intel machines. On the Opteron, you can get within 5% or so with a rolled loop in assembly, but I've not gotten a C code to do that.I think the gcc unrolling probably defaults to something like 4 or 8 (guess from performance, not verified): unrolling all the way (the loop is over a compile-time constant) is the way to go . . . When you said competitive, did you mean that gcc 4 ku=1 was competitive with gcc 4 ku=40 or gcc 3 ku=1? If the latter, I find it hard to believe unless you use SSE for gcc 4 and something unexpected happens. Even so, if you are using SSE try it with the single precision kernel, where SSE cannot compete with the x87 unit (even the broken one in gcc 4). Thanks, Clint -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827
[Bug preprocessor/28165] New: _Pragma GCC system_header broken
In a main translation unit, this: #pragma GCC system_header results in this warning: warning: #pragma system_header ignored outside include file However, this doesn't: _Pragma (GCC system_header) In fact, this causes GCC to emit a line marker switching the main translation unit to look like a system header. -Chris -- Summary: _Pragma GCC system_header broken Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sabre at nondot dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28165
[Bug c/28166] New: internal compiler error when -finstrument-functions on an inline function.
Internal compiler error when compiling an inline static function with -finstrument-functions and -finline-functions, even if the function has the no_instrument_function attribute. No error occurs if inlining is turned off or an addressable version of the function is provided with -fkeep-inline-functions -- Summary: internal compiler error when -finstrument-functions on an inline function. Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: murdo at catapult dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28166
[Bug c/28166] internal compiler error when -finstrument-functions on an inline function.
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 02:42 --- This was fixed in 4.0.0 and this is also a dup of bug 16780. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16780 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28166
[Bug c/16780] [3.4 regression] ICE with -finstrument-functions -funit-at-a-time -finline -finline-functions
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 02:42 --- *** Bug 28166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||murdo at catapult dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16780
[Bug c/28166] internal compiler error when -finstrument-functions on an inline function.
--- Comment #2 from murdo at catapult dot com 2006-06-26 02:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11754) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11754action=view) Minimum failing case plus gcc version, command, output and .i file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28166
