[Bug target/29474] [4.1 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:34 --- Created an attachment (id=12434) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12434action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
[Bug target/29474] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:37 --- Created an attachment (id=12435) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12435action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
[Bug fortran/29067] Internal Error: gfc_resolve_expr(): Bad expression type
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 08:40 --- (In reply to comment #10) This trimmed down example is invalid code. The if (i0) statement tries to use before it is defined. Sorry about that: the following code is valid, and also fails to compile with the same error. implicit none integer :: n, i character(len=16),parameter :: s = i = 0 ; n = 9 if (s(9:16) == 90123456) then endif if (i 0) then write (i,*) n call foo(0) endif do i = 1, n end do end -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29067
[Bug target/28181] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:43 --- Created an attachment (id=12436) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12436action=view) testcase another testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28181
[Bug debug/28834] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] -O3 -g crashes sometimes when using may_alias and structs
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 11:38 --- Also fails on SPARC with -O3 -g. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28834
[Bug c++/29475] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] incomplete template diagnostics.
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 14:52 --- Confirmed, a regression from 3.3. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-15 14:52:00 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29475
[Bug c/29478] [4.2 Regression] optmization generates warning for casts
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:25 --- Confirmed, a regression from 4.1.2. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-15 15:25:39 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29478
[Bug middle-end/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found)
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:31 --- (In reply to comment #3) Confirmed. The warning is correct - we emit it with explicit casts, too. But surprisingly -Wno-cast-qual does not get rid of it. Except it is not correct and is a regression, see PR 29478. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29254
[Bug middle-end/29478] [4.2 Regression] optmization generates warning for casts
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:41 --- Janis, Could you do a regression hunt on this bug? Thanks, Andrew -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29478
[Bug middle-end/29299] [4.2 Regresion] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope static variables
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 16:33 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
[Bug middle-end/29299] [4.2 Regresion] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope static variables
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 17:03 --- Not yet for -fno-unit-at-a-time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
[Bug middle-end/29299] [4.2 Regresion] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope static variables
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
[Bug middle-end/29439] [4.2 only] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-10-15 18:02 --- Created an attachment (id=12440) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12440action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug middle-end/29439] [4.2 only] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-10-15 18:02 --- Created an attachment (id=12441) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12441action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug middle-end/29439] [4.2 regression] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 18:35 --- This worked in 4.2.0 20061002 but failed in 4.2.0 20061014 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug tree-optimization/29439] [4.2 regression] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 18:56 --- The call int_const_binop to seems to be wrong, if the comment is correct the following is more correct: tree tmp = int_const_binop (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR, res, val1, 0); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug c/29481] extra line in gcc/cgraphunit.c at line 1135
--- Comment #1 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2006-10-15 19:10 --- The line is actually in gcc/cgraphunit.c and not graphunit.c (sorry). cgraphunit.c was subjected to change by Jan Hubicka and Richard Guenther to fix PR middle-end/29299 on 2006-10-15. Probably something went wrong during the update of the master file. -- malitzke at metronets dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|extra line in |extra line in |gcc/graphunit.c at line 1135|gcc/cgraphunit.c at line ||1135 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29481
[Bug middle-end/29481] [4.2 Regression] extra line in gcc/cgraphunit.c at line 1135
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:12 --- Already fixed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-10/msg00428.html -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |normal Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c |middle-end Keywords||build Resolution||FIXED Summary|extra line in |[4.2 Regression] extra line |gcc/cgraphunit.c at line|in gcc/cgraphunit.c at line |1135|1135 Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29481
[Bug c/29480] Feature request - Addition to FORTIFY_SOURCE feature
--- Comment #2 from robert at linuxfromscratch dot org 2006-10-15 19:41
---
echo '#include unistd.h
int main () {
chdir( / );
}' example.c
$ gcc -o example example.c -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2
example.c: In function 'main':
example.c:5: warning: ignoring return value of 'chdir', declared with attribute
warn_unused_result
echo '#include unistd.h
#include assert.h
int main () {
assert (chdir( / ));
}' example2.c
$ gcc -o example2 example2.c -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2
With assert(3) there's no warning.
These warnings usually affect fwrite(), dup(), chdir(), fchown(), fgets(),
write(), mktemp(), mkstemp(), and mkdtemp(). The results of these are usually
checked later by other functions, but FORTIFY_SOURCE does not know that and
complains.
To silence the warning we could either add more logic to FORTIFY_SOURCE to
follow functions, checking if their returns go unused in the completed code, or
add assert(3).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29480
[Bug c/29480] Feature request - Addition to FORTIFY_SOURCE feature
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 --- That is because assert checks the result except when -DNDEBUG. This in turn is really a dup or bug 6906 which is about warning on side effects to assert. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6906 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29480
[Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 --- *** Bug 29480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robert at linuxfromscratch ||dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
[Bug middle-end/29481] [4.2 Regression] extra line in gcc/cgraphunit.c at line 1135
--- Comment #3 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2006-10-15 19:46 --- This shows fantastic turnaroud; even on a weekend. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29481
[Bug middle-end/29241] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] [non unit-at-a-time] ICE with always inline
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:46 --- Subject: Bug 29241 Author: hubicka Date: Sun Oct 15 19:46:26 2006 New Revision: 117753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117753 Log: PR middle-end/29241 * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_preserve_function_body_p): Preserve functions declared always_inline even when not inlining. * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr29241.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr29241.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29241
[Bug c++/29363] [4.2 regression] ICE throwing undeclared object
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
[Bug c++/29388] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid nested name specifier
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29388
[Bug target/29401] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code elimination)
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401
[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:21 --- There is long-standing confusion in the C++ standard regarding the naming of destructors in various situations. (Part of the issue is to what extent destructors have names, and how the injection of class names into their own scopes work, and how the lookup rules for qualified names apply to destructors, and so forth.) However, I do think this code should be accepted; it doesn't look like one of the particularly tricky cases. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29408
[Bug tree-optimization/29415] [4.2 Regression] bad code reordering around inline asm block
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29415
[Bug c++/29417] [4.2 Regression] link fails with debug and anonymous namespace
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29417
[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] segmentation fault
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
[Bug debug/29436] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in modified_type_die
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29436
[Bug c++/29438] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Friendship problem
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29438
[Bug tree-optimization/29439] [4.2 regression] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:27 --- Is there a C/C++ equivalent? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug c++/29470] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Using declaration access semantics change with templates
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29470
[Bug c++/29475] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] incomplete template diagnostics.
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29475
[Bug middle-end/29478] [4.2 Regression] optmization generates warning for casts
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29478
[Bug tree-optimization/29439] [4.2 regression] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:30 --- (In reply to comment #9) Is there a C/C++ equivalent? No because it depends on non constant subtypes. But that does not mean we could get the wrong answer from VRP because overflow is incorrectly set. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug target/29401] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code elimination)
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-15 22:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code
elimination)
(insn:TI 38 37 26 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 1 dx [+4 ])
(ashiftrt:SI (reg:SI 1 dx [+4 ])
(const_int 15 [0xf])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
]) 443 {*ashrsi3_1} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
(expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 1 dx [+4 ])
(nil
note the problematic partially dead DI ax:dx which flow does not handle,
so the redundant instruction does not get deleted. A peephole might be
able to fix this until new dataflow maybe handles this case(?).
It seems to me that the instruction is completely dead from post-reload
dataflow point of view (ie return value is just eax and both sets are
correctly marked as unused). Perhaps we just somehow managed to drop
post-read DCE?
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401
[Bug middle-end/29299] [4.2 Regression] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope static variables
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-15 22:33 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regresion] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope static variables Reopening because it is not fixed for non unit at a time mode (-O0 for C). -O0 gets it right, just -O1 -fno-unit-at-a-time fails, but I am testing patch for this already. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
[Bug c++/28211] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong linkage of template argument, diagnostic could be improved
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28211
[Bug target/29300] FAIL: gcc.dg/pthread-init-[12].c (test for excess errors)
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 22:54 --- Subject: Bug 29300 Author: danglin Date: Sun Oct 15 22:54:36 2006 New Revision: 117754 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117754 Log: PR target/29300 * inclhack.def (hpux_pthread_initializers): New hack. * tests/base/sys/pthread.h: New file. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. Added: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/fixincludes/tests/base/sys/pthread.h Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/fixincludes/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/fixincludes/fixincl.x branches/gcc-4_1-branch/fixincludes/inclhack.def -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29300
[Bug target/29300] FAIL: gcc.dg/pthread-init-[12].c (test for excess errors)
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 22:58 --- Subject: Bug 29300 Author: danglin Date: Sun Oct 15 22:58:29 2006 New Revision: 117755 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117755 Log: PR target/29300 * inclhack.def (hpux_pthread_initializers): New hack. * tests/base/sys/pthread.h: New file. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. Added: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/fixincludes/tests/base/sys/pthread.h Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/fixincludes/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/fixincludes/fixincl.x branches/gcc-4_0-branch/fixincludes/inclhack.def -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29300
[Bug tree-optimization/29439] [4.2 regression] ICE in fold-const.c:1385 with -O1 -fwrapv -ftree-vrp
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:15 --- Mine. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
[Bug fortran/29403] print ('(a)') not working, print '(a) works
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:51 --- Subject: Bug 29403 Author: kargl Date: Mon Oct 16 00:51:46 2006 New Revision: 117764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117764 Log: 2006-10-15 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/29403 * io.c (match_io): Check for a default-char-expr for PRINT format. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29403
[Bug fortran/29403] print ('(a)') not working, print '(a) works
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:54 --- Subject: Bug 29403 Author: kargl Date: Mon Oct 16 00:54:01 2006 New Revision: 117765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117765 Log: 2006-10-15 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/29403 * gfortran.dg/print_1.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_1.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29403
[Bug middle-end/20491] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042
--- Comment #32 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:06 --- Subject: Bug 20491 Author: danglin Date: Mon Oct 16 01:05:51 2006 New Revision: 117766 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117766 Log: PR middle-end/20491 gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c: Skip on hppa*64*-*-*. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
[Bug middle-end/20491] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042
--- Comment #33 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:08 --- Subject: Bug 20491 Author: danglin Date: Mon Oct 16 01:08:04 2006 New Revision: 117767 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117767 Log: PR middle-end/20491 gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c: Skip on hppa*64*-*-*. Modified: branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
[Bug middle-end/20491] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042
--- Comment #34 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:09 --- Subject: Bug 20491 Author: danglin Date: Mon Oct 16 01:09:23 2006 New Revision: 117768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117768 Log: PR middle-end/20491 gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c: Skip on hppa*64*-*-*. Modified: branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.1/4.2 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|[DR 224] error: non-template|[DR 224] [4.1/4.2 |'pair' used as template |Regression] error: non- ||template 'pair' used as ||template Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469
[Bug middle-end/20491] internal compiler error: in subreg_regno_offset, at rtlanal.c:3042
--- Comment #35 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:40 --- I think the PR can be closed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
[Bug target/28821] Unable to build Python
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:42 --- Fixed by: 2006-10-15 John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * pa64-hpux.h (LINK_SPEC): Force __cxa_finalize to be an undefined symbol in the output file for non-shared links when -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs isn't specified. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28821
[Bug target/28821] Unable to build Python
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-16 01:48 --- Subject: Re: Unable to build Python Fixed by: 2006-10-15 John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * pa64-hpux.h (LINK_SPEC): Force __cxa_finalize to be an undefined symbol in the output file for non-shared links when -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs isn't specified. Not quite. It resolves one problem but there's still a problem deregistering objects when a shared library is unloaded. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28821
