[Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:39:43 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/34378] [autovectorize]: missed optimization

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34378

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:39:02 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/43425] gcc should vectorize this loop by substitution

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43425

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:38:21 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug middle-end/41115] Tree-vectorizer: VecCost tuning for X2: Without vectorization 30% faster

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:37:32 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/22184] tree vectorizer depends on context

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22184

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:36:08 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug middle-end/49969] not vectorized: data ref analysis failed

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49969

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||53947

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:34:49 UTC ---
Link to vectorizer missed-optimization meta-bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2012-07-13
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther  2012-07-13 
08:29:36 UTC ---
Confirmed.

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] New: [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947

 Bug #: 53947
   Summary: [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
Classification: Unclassified
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: meta-bug, missed-optimization
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P3
 Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rgue...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug go/53879] [4.6] new glibc: sysinfo.go:5976:68: error: expected ‘{’

2012-07-13 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53879

Jan Kratochvil  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Version|4.8.0   |4.6.4
 Resolution|FIXED   |
Summary|new glibc:  |[4.6] new glibc:
   |sysinfo.go:5976:68: error:  |sysinfo.go:5976:68: error:
   |expected ‘{’|expected ‘{’

--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil  
2012-07-13 08:20:43 UTC ---
It still seems to affect the 4.6 branch:

sysinfo.go:3681:63: error: expected '{'
sysinfo.go:3681:63: error: expected ';' or '}' or newline
sysinfo.go:3681:80: error: expected field name

[Bug regression/53203] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c

2012-07-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
   Last reconfirmed||2012-07-13
 Depends on||53176
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  2012-07-13 
08:13:14 UTC ---
This seems connected to PR53176 but the reasons aren't obvious.  Now that
PR53176 is fixed, this went (back) into hiding; the test now passes.  I think
there's a deeper issue so I'm just suspending this PR, not resolving as fixed.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

2012-07-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
   |atches/2012-05/msg00609.htm |atches/2012-07/msg00280.htm
   |l   |l
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #26 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  2012-07-13 
08:04:39 UTC ---
fixed in default costs too now.

[Bug c++/53531] <,,,,> accepted as template arguments for variadic template

2012-07-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
  Known to fail||4.6.3, 4.7.1

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely  2012-07-13 
07:54:37 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk

[Bug c++/53531] <,,,,> accepted as template arguments for variadic template

2012-07-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely  2012-07-13 
07:53:21 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jul 13 07:53:12 2012
New Revision: 189452

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189452
Log:
PR c++/53531
* testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic135.C: New.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic135.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug other/51678] 'make pdf' is broken in libiberty

2012-07-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51678

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  2012-07-13 07:51:14 
UTC ---

[Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work||4.2.4
   Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.7/4.8 Regression]
   |value_format, at|internal compiler error: in
   |dwarf2out.c:8010|value_format, at
   ||dwarf2out.c:8010

[Bug debug/53135] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010

2012-07-13 Thread dushistov at mail dot ru 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135

Evgeniy Dushistov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dushistov at mail dot ru

--- Comment #2 from Evgeniy Dushistov  2012-07-13 
07:29:22 UTC ---
I think that it should be marked as regression.
Because of qt 4.6.3 give such error message with gcc 4.7.1,
but with gcc 4.2 all works fine.

Can anybody with suitable permissions mark this bug as regression?

<    1   2