[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-07-29 08:00:01 UTC --- This is due to revision 189514 (with r189513 reverted in order to bootstrap): Author:janus Date:Mon Jul 16 10:13:19 2012 UTC (12 days, 21 hours ago) Changed paths:6 Log Message: 2012-07-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/53956 * gfortran.h (gfc_copy_formal_args,gfc_copy_formal_args_ppc): Modified prototypes. * symbol.c (gfc_copy_formal_args): New argument 'if_src'. Copy if_source of dummy procedures. (gfc_copy_formal_args_ppc): Ditto. * resolve.c (resolve_procedure_interface): Pass IFSRC_DECL to gfc_copy_formal_args. (resolve_fl_derived0): Pass IFSRC_DECL to gfc_copy_formal_args_ppc. 2012-07-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/53956 * gfortran.dg/proc_decl_28.f90: New.
[Bug target/54115] New: Unnecessary sign extensions for __builtin_ctz et al.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54115
Bug #: 54115
Summary: Unnecessary sign extensions for __builtin_ctz et al.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: nel...@seznam.cz
Instructions bsf,bsr,bsfq... return integer in range 0..63.
When used in 64 bit computations an unnecessary sign extension is emitted as
following example shows:
#include stdint.h
uint64_t foo(long x){
return __builtin_ctzl(x);
}
Output:
.file exa.c
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl foo
.type foo, @function
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
bsfq %rdi, %rax
cltq
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size foo, .-foo
.ident GCC: (Debian 4.7.1-2) 4.7.1
.section .note.GNU-stack,,@progbits
[Bug target/54115] Unnecessary sign extensions for __builtin_ctz et al.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54115 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 08:15:14 UTC --- Dup of bug 29776 . *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29776 ***
[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neleai at seznam dot cz --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 08:15:14 UTC --- *** Bug 54115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 08:46:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) This is due to revision 189514 (with r189513 reverted in order to bootstrap): Ok, I already suspected this revision as a possible candidate for the breakage. Will have a look ...
[Bug tree-optimization/54116] New: suboptimal code for tight loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54116
Bug #: 54116
Summary: suboptimal code for tight loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: nel...@seznam.cz
Consider following loop.
int recal(int *x){int i;
for(i=0;;i+=4){
if(__builtin_expect((x[i]|x[i+1])|(x[i+2]|x[i+3]),0))
break;
}
return (x[i]|x[i+1])*(x[i+2]|x[i+3]);
}
On x64 orl instruction is destructive. Gcc saves intermediate result to
register instead recalculating it at end of loop, making loop run slower.
Relevant assembly output is following:
gcc-4.7 -O3 -S
.file recal.c
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl recal
.type recal, @function
recal:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movl12(%rdi), %edx
orl 8(%rdi), %edx
movl4(%rdi), %ecx
orl (%rdi), %ecx
movl%edx, %eax
orl %ecx, %eax
jne .L2
leaq16(%rdi), %rax
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L3:
movl12(%rax), %edx
orl 8(%rax), %edx
movl4(%rax), %ecx
orl (%rax), %ecx
addq$16, %rax
movl%edx, %esi
orl %ecx, %esi
je .L3
.L2:
movl%ecx, %eax
imull %edx, %eax
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size recal, .-recal
.ident GCC: (Debian 4.7.1-2) 4.7.1
.section.note.GNU-stack,,@progbits
--
[Bug tree-optimization/54116] suboptimal code for tight loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54116 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 10:13:41 UTC --- The tree level looks correct: bb 4: # ivtmp.23_69 = PHI ivtmp.23_68(5), ivtmp.23_66(3) D.1771_65 = (void *) ivtmp.23_69; D.1717_6 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 0B]; D.1722_10 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 4B]; D.1723_11 = D.1722_10 | D.1717_6; D.1727_15 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 8B]; D.1731_19 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 12B]; D.1732_20 = D.1731_19 | D.1727_15; D.1733_21 = D.1732_20 | D.1723_11; ivtmp.23_68 = ivtmp.23_69 + 16; if (D.1733_21 != 0) goto bb 6; else goto bb 5; bb 5: goto bb 4; bb 6: # D.1723_22 = PHI D.1723_11(4), D.1723_36(2) # D.1732_23 = PHI D.1732_20(4), D.1732_45(2) D.1737_25 = D.1723_22 * D.1732_23; return D.1737_25; --- CUT Are you trying to say GCC should copy the loop header in this case? Or keeping around x[i]|x[i+1] and x[i+2]|x[i+3] result increases register pressure and exposes issues with 2-operand machines in some cases?
[Bug tree-optimization/54116] suboptimal code for tight loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54116 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2012-07-29 10:30:46 UTC --- On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:13:41AM +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54116 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 10:13:41 UTC --- The tree level looks correct: bb 4: # ivtmp.23_69 = PHI ivtmp.23_68(5), ivtmp.23_66(3) D.1771_65 = (void *) ivtmp.23_69; D.1717_6 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 0B]; D.1722_10 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 4B]; D.1723_11 = D.1722_10 | D.1717_6; D.1727_15 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 8B]; D.1731_19 = MEM[base: D.1771_65, offset: 12B]; D.1732_20 = D.1731_19 | D.1727_15; D.1733_21 = D.1732_20 | D.1723_11; ivtmp.23_68 = ivtmp.23_69 + 16; if (D.1733_21 != 0) goto bb 6; else goto bb 5; bb 5: goto bb 4; bb 6: # D.1723_22 = PHI D.1723_11(4), D.1723_36(2) # D.1732_23 = PHI D.1732_20(4), D.1732_45(2) D.1737_25 = D.1723_22 * D.1732_23; return D.1737_25; --- CUT Are you trying to say GCC should copy the loop header in this case? Or keeping around x[i]|x[i+1] and x[i+2]|x[i+3] result increases register pressure and exposes issues with 2-operand machines in some cases? Increases register pressure. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug.
[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-12-24 00:00:00 |2012-07-29 0:00
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29
13:23:30 UTC ---
Tested with trunk r189929 on x86-64 (generic).
#define MODE signed // or unsigned
unsigned mask[8];
unsigned foo(unsigned y, unsigned char x)
{
MODE int c = (MODE) __builtin_ctz(x);
unsigned int m = mask[c];
return y m;
}
With MODE==signed:
movzbl %sil, %esi
movl%edi, %eax
rep; bsfl %esi, %esi
movslq %esi, %rsi
andlmask(,%rsi,4), %eax
ret
With MODE==unsigned:
movzbl %sil, %esi
movl%edi, %eax
rep; bsfl %esi, %esi
movl%esi, %esi
andlmask(,%rsi,4), %eax
ret
The movl %esi, %esi is a zeroextendsidi:
#(insn:TI 9 2 10 2 (parallel [
#(set (reg:SI 4 si [orig:60 D.1716 ] [60])
#(ctz:SI (reg:SI 4 si [orig:68 D.1715 ] [68])))
#(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
#]) t.c:6 666 {ctzsi2}
# (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
#(nil)))
rep; bsfl %esi, %esi # 9 ctzsi2 [length = 4]
#(insn:TI 10 9 12 2 (set (reg:DI 4 si [orig:70 D.1716 ] [70])
#(zero_extend:DI (reg:SI 4 si [orig:60 D.1716 ] [60]))) t.c:7 113
{*zero_extendsidi2_rex64}
# (nil))
movl%esi, %esi # 10*zero_extendsidi2_rex64/1 [length
= 2]
Perhaps REE can be taught about ctz giving a non-negative result.
[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27317|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 14:44:25 UTC --- Created attachment 27885 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27885 MULT_EXPR It still requires some double-checking, a testcase, a bootstrap+regtest, but it seems to give sensible results.
[Bug pch/54117] New: FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 Bug #: 54117 Summary: FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: pch AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dang...@gcc.gnu.org Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ ./decl-3.h -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -g -o decl-3.h.gch(timeout = 30 0) spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ ./decl-3.h -fno- diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -g -o decl-3.h.gch ./decl-3.h:3:1: internal compiler error: in c_common_write_pch, at c-family/c-pc h.c:181 Please submit a full bug report,with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. compiler exited with status 1 output is: ./decl-3.h:3:1: internal compiler error: in c_common_write_pch, at c-family/c-pc h.c:181 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors) Excess errors: ./decl-3.h:3:1: internal compiler error: in c_common_write_pch, at c-family/c-pch.c:181 pch file 'decl-3.h.gch' missing FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-3.c -O0 -g assembly file 'decl-3.s' missing FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison Similar fails: FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-3.c -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-3.c -O3 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./decl-4.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)FAIL: ./decl-4.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-4.c -O0 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-4.c -O0 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./decl-4.h -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./decl-4.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-4.c -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-4.c -O3 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./struct-1.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./struct-1.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/struct-1.c -O0 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/struct-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./struct-1.h -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./struct-1.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/struct-1.c -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/struct-1.c -O3 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./system-1.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./system-1.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/system-1.c -O0 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/system-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./system-1.h -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./system-1.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/system-1.c -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/system-1.c -O3 -g assembly comparison FAIL: ./warn-1.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./warn-1.h -O0 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/warn-1.c -O0 -g FAIL: ./warn-1.h -O3 -g (internal compiler error) FAIL: ./warn-1.h -O3 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/warn-1.c -O3 -g
[Bug lto/54118] New: ICE in lto_output_varpool_node
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54118 Bug #: 54118 Summary: ICE in lto_output_varpool_node Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: wbr...@gmail.com g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-init.C fails with lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:595 if -flto is used Compiler version: 4.7.2 20120728 (prerelease) (Gentoo Hardened 4.7.2 p1.0, pie-0.5.3) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu configure flags: --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.7.2 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/include/g++-v4 --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --with-ppl --with-cloog --disable-ppl-version-check --with-cloog-include=/usr/include/cloog-ppl --enable-lto --disable-nls --with-system-zlib --enable-obsolete --disable-werror --enable-secureplt --enable-multilib --with-multilib-list=m32,m64 --enable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-esp --enable-libgomp --with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/python --enable-checking=release --disable-libgcj --disable-libquadmath --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-targets=all --with-bugurl=http://bugs.gentoo.org/ --with-pkgversion='Gentoo Hardened 4.7.2 p1.0, pie-0.5.3'
[Bug tree-optimization/54119] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119
Bug #: 54119
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times
gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dang...@gcc.gnu.org
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -w -O1 -fdump-tree-gimple -S -o vector-4.s
(timeout = 300)
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
/test/gnu/gcc/gc
c/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -w -O1
-fdump-tree-gimple -S -o vector-4.s
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c (test for excess errors)FAIL:
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, {
0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
[Bug tree-optimization/54119] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 15:25:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27886 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27886 Tree dump
[Bug tree-optimization/54119] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 15:29:37 UTC --- Created attachment 27887 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27887 Tree dump
[Bug tree-optimization/54119] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 15:35:26 UTC --- Looks like a callee copies issue.
[Bug pch/54117] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:18:19 UTC --- The following stabs output is generated after pch_init is called in the decl-3.h test: .stabsfoo_p:t16=17=*18=xsfoo:,128,0,2,0
[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:31:22 UTC --- Created attachment 27888 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27888 Patch Fixes 930921-1.c and four original acats fails, but not additional acats fails introduced in 189441.
[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert 3x slower than 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #23 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:44:26 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Sun Jul 29 16:44:18 2012 New Revision: 189938 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189938 Log: 2012-07-29 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org PR libstdc++/54075 * include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Prime_rehash_policy::_M_next_bkt): Add a growth factor set to 2 to boost growth in the number of buckets. * testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert/unordered_set.cc: New. Added: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert/unordered_set.cc Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable_policy.h
[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g|[4.8 Regression] FAIL: |(internal compiler error) |./decl-3.h -O0 -g ||(internal compiler error) --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:45:36 UTC --- Breakpoint 1, pch_init () at ../../gcc/gcc/c-family/c-pch.c:161 161 (*debug_hooks-handle_pch) (0); (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 4, dbxout_begin_complex_stabs () at ../../gcc/gcc/dbxout.c:620 620 emit_pending_bincls_if_required (); (gdb) bt #0 dbxout_begin_complex_stabs () at ../../gcc/gcc/dbxout.c:620 #1 0x0088317c in dbxout_symbol (decl=0x7ae37ee0, local=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/dbxout.c:2816 #2 0x00876834 in dbxout_type_decl (decl=0x7ae37ee0, local=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/dbxout.c:1388 #3 0x010fc0ec in rest_of_decl_compilation (decl=0x7ae37ee0, top_level=1, at_end=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:196 #4 0x000bb148 in finish_decl (decl=0x7ae37ee0, init_loc=0, init=0x0, origtype=0x0, asmspec_tree=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/c/c-decl.c:4490 #5 0x001bb6f0 in c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (parser=0x7aeb2aa0, fndef_ok=0 '\000', static_assert_ok=1 '\001', empty_ok=1 '\001', nested=0 '\000', start_attr_ok=1 '\001', objc_foreach_object_declaration=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c:1665 #6 0x001bad54 in c_parser_external_declaration (parser=0x7aeb2aa0) at ../../gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c:1362 #7 0x001ba744 in c_parser_translation_unit (parser=0x7aeb2aa0) at ../../gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c:1250 #8 0x001d8a98 in c_parse_file () at ../../gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c:10836 #9 0x003211c0 in c_common_parse_file () at ../../gcc/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1137 #10 0x012ccf80 in compile_file () at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:546 #11 0x012d0420 in do_compile () at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1863 #12 0x012d070c in toplev_main (argc=16, argv=0x7eff0544) ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1939 #13 0x0424e104 in main (argc=16, argv=0x7eff0544) at ../../gcc/gcc/main.c:36
[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:50:37 UTC --- Reduced test case: subroutine compute_routine (zfunc) procedure(compute_routine) :: zfunc end subroutine I would assume that this is invalid, since the declaration of compute_routine's interface is somehow 'recursive', i.e. referring to itself.
[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:54:45 UTC --- I'll take this one. I think the assumption of operand placement is too embedded to tease out easily, so I'm going to approach this by re-canonicalizing PLUS_EXPR, POINTER_PLUS_EXPR, and MULT_EXPR when operand swapping has occurred. Are there other tree codes that could be broken?
[Bug fortran/51081] [F03] Proc-pointer assignment: Rejects valid internal proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51081 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 16:55:11 UTC --- Related accepts-invalid problem with proc-pointer assignment to an internal proc: implicit none procedure(real), pointer :: p p = scale print *,p(1.0,2) end /tmp/cc4EkFwV.o: In function `MAIN__': test.f90:(.text+0xf): undefined reference to `_gfortran_specific__scale_4'
[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert 3x slower than 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #24 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 17:06:25 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Sun Jul 29 17:06:21 2012 New Revision: 189941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189941 Log: 2012-07-29 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org PR libstdc++/54075 * include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Prime_rehash_policy::_M_next_bkt): Add a growth factor set to 2 to boost growth in the number of buckets. * testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert/unordered_set.cc: New. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/performance/23_containers/insert/unordered_set.cc Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable_policy.h
[Bug fortran/54120] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Bug #: 54120 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dang...@gcc.gnu.org Host: hppa*-*-* (32-bit) Target: hppa*-*-* (32-bit) Build: hppa*-*-* (32-bit) Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/ /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran- torture/execute/random_2.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -w -O0 -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/random_2.x(timeout = 300)spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/ /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execu te/random_2.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -w -O0 -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2. 0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs -o /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/random_2.x PASS: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 compilation, -O0 Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc:.:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libquadmath/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc spawn [open ...] Backtrace for this error: #0 0xC1D3A1BB FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O0 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O1 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O2 FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O2 -fomit-frame -pointer -finline-functions FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O2 -fomit-frame -pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O2 -fbounds-che ck FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution, -Os Problem was introduced between 189245 (ok) and 189394.
[Bug gcov-profile/54121] New: ICE at extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 sparc64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121 Bug #: 54121 Summary: ICE at extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 sparc64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jeng...@medozas.de Created attachment 27889 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27889 preprocessed input $ gcc -std=gnu99 -O1 -fprofile-generate=/tmp/x -c lz_decoder.i -fPIC -o lzd.o lz/lz_decoder.c: In function 'decode_buffer': lz/lz_decoder.c:124:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 267 85 233 7 (set (symbol_ref:DI (__gcov5.decode_buffer) [flags 0x2] var_decl 0xf80100dc1360 __gcov5.decode_buffer) (reg:DI 1 %g1)) -1 (nil)) lz/lz_decoder.c:124:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. The problem goes away if either of these is done: - using no optimization - leaving out -fPIC - leaving out -fprofile-generate $ gcc -v [Configured to output ELF64 objects by default] Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib64/gcc/sparc64-suse-linux/4.7/lto-wrapper Target: sparc64-suse-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.7 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-libitm --disable-plugin --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-linker-build-id --program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=ultrasparc --with-long-double-128 --build=sparc64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.1 20120723 [gcc-4_7-branch revision 189773] (SUSE Linux) with binutils-2.22 recog.c:2123 is the following: /* recog.c */ default: normal_insn: /* Ordinary insn: recognize it, get the operands via insn_extract and get the constraints. */ icode = recog_memoized (insn); if (icode 0) 2123# fatal_insn_not_found (insn); recog_data.n_operands = noperands = insn_data[icode].n_operands; recog_data.n_alternatives = insn_data[icode].n_alternatives; recog_data.n_dups = insn_data[icode].n_dups;
[Bug c++/54122] New: gcc segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside constructor of a templated class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122
Bug #: 54122
Summary: gcc segfault comparing enum class in lambda inside
constructor of a templated class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@nnamdi.co.uk
Created attachment 27890
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27890
Preprocessed source output from gcc
enum class Enum
{
VALUE_1,
VALUE_2
};
template class T
struct Struct
{
Struct()
{
const auto func = [=]
{
return (e == Enum::VALUE_2)
};
(void)func;
}
Enum e;
};
int main()
{
}
/tmp$ g++ -v -save-temps -std=c++11 test.cpp
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro
4.7.0-1ubuntu1' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.7
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686
--with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.0-1ubuntu1)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++11' '-shared-libgcc'
'-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/cc1plus -E -quiet -v -imultiarch
x86_64-linux-gnu -D_GNU_SOURCE test.cpp -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -std=c++11
-fpch-preprocess -fstack-protector -o test.ii
ignoring nonexistent directory /usr/local/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
ignoring nonexistent directory
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/include
#include ... search starts here:
#include ... search starts here:
/usr/include/c++/4.7
/usr/include/c++/4.7/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/include/c++/4.7/backward
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/include
/usr/local/include
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/include-fixed
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/include
End of search list.
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++11' '-shared-libgcc'
'-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/cc1plus -fpreprocessed test.ii -quiet
-dumpbase test.cpp -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase test -std=c++11
-version -fstack-protector -o test.s
GNU C++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.0-1ubuntu1) version 4.7.0 (x86_64-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0-p3,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=98 --param ggc-min-heapsize=127391
GNU C++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.0-1ubuntu1) version 4.7.0 (x86_64-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0-p3,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=98 --param ggc-min-heapsize=127391
Compiler executable checksum: ebe4fd45b8b9c3fd6dc0cfc73cec8259
test.cpp: In lambda function:
test.cpp:14:32: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs for instructions.
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccmDN5TQ.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.
[Bug fortran/51081] [F03] Proc-pointer assignment: Rejects valid internal proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51081
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 19:04:25 UTC ---
The following patch adds diagnostics to reject the invalid test case in comment
8:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c(revision 189929)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c(working copy)
@@ -3444,6 +3444,13 @@ gfc_check_pointer_assign (gfc_expr *lvalue, gfc_ex
at %L, rvalue-symtree-name, rvalue-where)
== FAILURE)
return FAILURE;
+ if (attr.intrinsic gfc_intrinsic_actual_ok (rvalue-symtree-name,
+ attr.subroutine) == 0)
+{
+ gfc_error (Intrinsic '%s' at %L is invalid in procedure pointer
+ assignment, rvalue-symtree-name, rvalue-where);
+ return FAILURE;
+}
}
/* Check for F08:C730. */
if (attr.elemental !attr.intrinsic)
[Bug fortran/51081] [F03] Proc-pointer assignment: Rejects valid internal proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51081 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 20:15:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) The following patch adds diagnostics to reject the invalid test case in comment 8: ... and regtests cleanly.
[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 20:54:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) I would assume that this is invalid, since the declaration of compute_routine's interface is somehow 'recursive', i.e. referring to itself. ... however, I could not find anything in the standard that would prohibit it. And also Bob Corbett claims that it is valid in the c.l.f. thread mentioned in comment #0. The problem is that we generate an infinite chain of symbols: 'compute_routine' has a formal argument 'zfunc', which itself has an argument 'zfunc', and so on. Certainly, gfc_copy_formal_args plays a role in this process, but also resolve_formal_arglist is involved.
[Bug c/54123] New: inline functions not optimized as well as static inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54123 Bug #: 54123 Summary: inline functions not optimized as well as static inline Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: egg...@gnu.org Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Build: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Created attachment 27891 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27891 test case source code GCC does not optimize a function declared 'inline' as well as it optimizes the same function declared 'static inline'. There is no reason to optimize differently depending on whether an inline function is static. I discovered this problem when using GCC 4.7.1 to compile a test version of GNU Emacs that uses extern inline functions. This is a regression from GCC 4.6.3, which optimizes equally well in both cases. I enclose a small example of the problem. With GNU Emacs I found many more like this, and the size of the GNU Emacs text segment grew by 0.9% when compiled to use extern inline rather than static inline functions. To reproduce the problem, process the attached program xml-bug1.c as follows. (I'll also attach xml-static-inline.s and xml-inline.s.) gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -S -DINLINE='static inline' -o xml-static-inline.s xml-bug1.c gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -S -DINLINE='inline' -o xml-inline.s xml-bug1.c diff -u xml-static-inline.s xml-inline.s The diff output will read as follows. Notice that xml-inline.s contains an extra instruction 'cmpq Qnil(%rip), %r12' that xml-static-inline.s does not. The code is correct, but it's not optimized as well as it should be. --- xml-static-inline.s2012-07-29 13:39:24.254184691 -0700 +++ xml-inline.s2012-07-29 13:49:01.555043179 -0700 @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ .L40: cmpqQnil(%rip), %r12 je.L51 +.L69: movq%r12, %rax movqQstringp(%rip), %rdi andl$7, %eax @@ -342,13 +343,8 @@ ret .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 -.L51: -.cfi_restore_state -movl$.LC1, %r13d -jmp.L41 -.p2align 4,,10 -.p2align 3 .L68: +.cfi_restore_state movq%r12, %rdi callxmlDocGetRootElement testq%rax, %rax @@ -363,8 +359,14 @@ movq%rsi, %rdi movq%rsi, 8(%rsp) callmove_gap +cmpqQnil(%rip), %r12 movq8(%rsp), %rsi -jmp.L40 +jne.L69 +.p2align 4,,10 +.p2align 3 +.L51: +movl$.LC1, %r13d +jmp.L41 .L66: movq%rax, %rdx jmp.L45
[Bug c/54123] inline functions not optimized as well as static inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54123 --- Comment #1 from eggert at gnu dot org 2012-07-29 21:07:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27892 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27892 test case compiled with -DINLINE='static inline'
[Bug c/54123] inline functions not optimized as well as static inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54123 --- Comment #2 from eggert at gnu dot org 2012-07-29 21:08:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27893 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27893 test case compiled with -DINLINE='inline'
[Bug pch/54117] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: ./decl-3.h -O0 -g (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2012-07-29 CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1
[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-30 00:07:26 UTC --- Kaz, is it OK to close this issue?
[Bug web/54124] New: Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 Bug #: 54124 Summary: Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ksc...@eznet.net I was looking for a description of the -dM option. Currently, I'm able to find it using info on the old version of gcc that's installed at my workplace; the problem is that the current online HTML manual for v4.7.1 appears as if part of section 3.11 (options controlling the preprocessor) has been overwritten with other text about options that control warnings. As a result, the -dM option, which belongs in that section, seems to be missing from the HTML manual.
[Bug web/54124] Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-30 02:28:19 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/cpp/Invocation.html#index-dM-185 It is there for me. It is not under the GCC manual but rather the CPP manual.
[Bug web/54124] Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Scott kscott at eznet dot net 2012-07-30 02:40:29 UTC --- Now that you mention it, I looked again, and it in fact is there, in the gcc manual. The problem was that, on my prior readings, I instinctively ignored the entire '-dCHARS' section, as it didn't seem like the thing I was looking for. So it might be a little clearer to include the '-d' with each of the five suboptions.
[Bug web/54124] Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-30 02:44:42 UTC --- Well these options are really only for debugging and nothing else.
[Bug web/54124] Web-based GCC 4.7.1 manual seems to have a section corrupted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54124 Kevin Scott kscott at eznet dot net changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedo ||cs/gcc-4.7.1/gcc/Preprocess ||or-Options.html#Preprocesso ||r-Options Version|unknown |4.7.1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #4 from Kevin Scott kscott at eznet dot net 2012-07-30 03:12:19 UTC --- I've changed the category to enhancement since it only concerns the readability of the -dCHARS section(s) of the manual(s). Feel free to either edit the manual(s) or defer or close, as you see fit.
[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-30 03:16:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Kaz, is it OK to close this issue? Yes. Please go ahead.
