[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:21:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) >/* Allow any built-in function; if the expansion > isn't constant, we'll deal with that then. */ >&& !is_builtin_fn (fun)) The problem seems to be in the dealing with it "then"; cxx_eval_builtin_function_call needs to actually check whether folding the call produces a constant or not.
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:15:29 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:15:03 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55058] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type conversion error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:15:08 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:14:34 UTC --- Fix applied for 4.6.4 as well.
[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:13:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 05:13:33 2012 New Revision: 194290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194290 Log: PR c++/54325 * tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Don't check for abstract class. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-pure.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/tree.c branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C
[Bug c++/55058] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type conversion error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:13:30 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 05:13:22 2012 New Revision: 194289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194289 Log: PR c++/55058 * pt.c (tsubst): Keep the quals when looking through a typedef. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typedef40.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 05:13:20 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 05:13:11 2012 New Revision: 194288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194288 Log: PR c++/55249 * tree.c (build_vec_init_elt): Use the type of the initializer. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array25.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/tree.c
[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:58:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:58:45 2012 New Revision: 194286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194286 Log: PR c++/55032 * tree.c (build_array_type_1): Re-layout if we found it in the hash table. Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array24.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/tree.c
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:58:41 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:58:32 2012 New Revision: 194285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194285 Log: PR c++/55249 * tree.c (build_vec_init_elt): Use the type of the initializer. Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array25.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/tree.c
[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:54:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:54:27 2012 New Revision: 194284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194284 Log: PR c++/54325 * tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Don't check for abstract class. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-pure.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/tree.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/abstract3.C
[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:54:23 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:54:12 2012 New Revision: 194283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194283 Log: add PR 55245 marker Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
[Bug c++/55058] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type conversion error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:54:12 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:53:59 2012 New Revision: 194282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194282 Log: PR c++/55058 * pt.c (tsubst): Keep the quals when looking through a typedef. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typedef40.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-07 04:53:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:53:46 2012 New Revision: 194281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194281 Log: PR c++/55249 * tree.c (build_vec_init_elt): Use the type of the initializer. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array25.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/tree.c
[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 03:44:21 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug gcov-profile/49484] gcov crash if two(or more) forks happen at the same time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #27 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07 02:35:42 UTC ---
Author: asharif
Date: Fri Dec 7 02:35:37 2012
New Revision: 194279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194279
Log:
2012-12-03 Ahmad Sharif
Backport r185231 from trunk.
2012-03-12 Richard Guenther
* gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
* gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
(__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function.
* gthr-single.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
PR gcov/49484
* libgcov.c: Include gthr.h.
(__gcov_flush_mx): New global variable.
(init_mx, init_mx_once): New functions.
(__gcov_flush): Protect self with a mutex.
(__gcov_fork): Re-initialize mutex after forking.
* unwind-dw2-fde.c: Change condition under which to use
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION.
Modified:
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/ (props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/gcc/ (props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-round.c
(props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/ChangeLog.google-4_7
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/gthr-single.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/gthr.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/libgcov.c
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libjava/classpath/ (props changed)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/gcc/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange:
branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-round.c
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7-mobile/libjava/classpath/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
[Bug ada/52110] s-osinte.ads:447:09: "clockid_t" conflicts with declaration at line 194
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2012-12-07 00:59:58 UTC --- Volatile fails for the following reason: /xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/ -B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/bin/ -B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/lib/ -isystem /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/include -isystem /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/sys-include-c -g -O2 -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc s-taprop.adb -o s-taprop.o s-taprop.adb:818:10: access to volatile object cannot yield access-to-non-volatile type s-taprop.adb:826:23: access to volatile object cannot yield access-to-non-volatile type
[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-07 CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org, ||zadeck at naturalbridge dot ||com Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-07 00:14:12 UTC --- I've looked a bit into this. The code in df-problems.c (see bug 32749) is at least inconsistent. df_note_bb_compute is supposed to set do_not_gen at the def, so that we emit the REG_UNUSED but not the REG_DEAD. However, it does not set do_not_gen for clobbers (may or must), even though it emits the note. Oh, and it only emits the note if it's not a call;for calls, the REG_UNUSED note is not emitted for clobbers (I wonder why that is), and we still fail to set do_not_gen, so we emit the REG_DEAD for the parallel use anyway. Kenny, it seems to me that we should set do_not_gen regardless of any clobber flags, because the whole (documented) point of do_not_gen is to avoid emitting a REG_DEAD for a parallel use, and we should make the REG_UNUSED note emission consistently conditional on clobbers. Does it sound like this would work?
[Bug debug/54774] insufficient debug info for strong typed enum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-07 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-07 00:11:10 UTC --- Confirming.
[Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer::__min'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2012-12-07 00:01:40 UTC --- Created attachment 28889 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28889 Preprocessed testcase
[Bug fortran/55395] [4.8 Regression] libgfortran bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-07 00:01:41 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug target/55610] cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 23:58:07 UTC --- We don't need to do that. We need to not run the unmap call in host-darwin.c when we dlopen things in the compiler; for example, dragonegg. Then, we need to test this and see if the bug is fixed. You can do that by adding in a #if 0 #end around the unmap call.
[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6 Regression] Compiler |Compiler segfault when |segfault when compiling a |compiling a small test case |small test case --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 22:18:18 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7 and 4.8 by patch for bug 55032.
[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 22:05:25 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 6 22:05:21 2012 New Revision: 194274 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194274 Log: PR target/55597 * config/i386/i386.c (legitimize_tls_address): Zero-extend x to Pmode, before using it as insn or call equivalent. testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/55597 * gcc.target/i386/pr55597.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55597.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/55593] [4.8 Regression] Bogus error on passing DO LOOP variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55593 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-12-06 22:02:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > From frontend-passes.c's doloop_code > > case EXEC_CALL: > f = co->symtree->n.sym->formal; > > I think one should use in this case > co->value.function.esym > > I believe co->value.function.* should always exist, Not for a subroutine call ;-) The following patch seems to work: Index: frontend-passes.c === --- frontend-passes.c (Revision 193793) +++ frontend-passes.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1277,8 +1277,12 @@ doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR break; case EXEC_CALL: - f = co->symtree->n.sym->formal; + if (co->resolved_sym == NULL) + break; + + f = co->resolved_sym->formal; + /* Withot a formal arglist, there is only unknown INTENT, which we don't check for. */ if (f == NULL) > given that it comes after > resolution (if not, the symtree can be used as fall back). In any case, one > needs to be careful if it isn't an "isym" instead. This is checked for in the code already. I could not come up with a test case which fails for a function, so I don't think this regression also applies to generic function calls.
[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-06 21:45:02 UTC --- Jakub, the configury patch is ok, thanks.
[Bug target/53359] [4.8 regression] undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer::__min'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-06 21:39:50 UTC --- I have a hunch that the patch for bug 53952 might fix this, if this happens to be another case of variables that are not addressable being SRAed or otherwise transformed in ways that makes mudflap marked as addressable and checked when they didn't even have to be output in the first place. A preprocessed testcase would help me test this theory more immediately with a cross compiler, rather than a full cross toolchain.
[Bug libmudflap/53952] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O[123]) execution test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-06 21:26:47 UTC --- Mine. Updated patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00371.html
[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-06 21:06:29 UTC --- After Jason's patch here (trunk@177066): PR c++/49813 * semantics.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Allow any builtin. (morally_constexpr_builtin_function_p): Remove. It seems we return true for any built-in in potential_constant_expression_1. This means that check_initializer->store_init_value->maybe_constant_init will chop off the built-in side of a COMPOUND_EXPR when setting a DECL_INITIAL, transforming: (COMPOUND_EXPR (CALL_EXPR built-in) INTEGER_CST) into INTEGER_CST Since potential_constant_expression_1 returns true for any built-in, we end up removing even a __builtin_exit from code like this: const int t = (__builtin_exit(0), 777); Jason, is this by design? Should we not limit the conditional here further?: /* Allow any built-in function; if the expansion isn't constant, we'll deal with that then. */ && !is_builtin_fn (fun))
[Bug rtl-optimization/55611] New: Operand swapping for commutative operators
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611 Bug #: 55611 Summary: Operand swapping for commutative operators Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: gli...@gcc.gnu.org Hello, this PR is here to remember this discussion on IRC. It started because I noticed that a patch I wrote for bug 55583 failed when the operands of | were not given in the right order, but is a more general question about how to avoid a combinatorial explosion of the number of patterns involving commutative operators. Two promising directions: put a stronger priority order on rtx (canonicalize more), or when priorities are the same and one order doesn't match, try the other one. Hello. It seems that in RTL we don't make a very strong effort to swap operands of commutative operators, we only swap when one is obviously more complicated than the other. For things like an OR of a left shift and a right shift, are we supposed to have 2 patterns in .md files? there is always a canonical form but I'm not sure that such combine helping pattern is really the correct approach if I compile C code (a<<2)|(b>>30) and (b>>30)|(a<<2) I don't get the same pattern, so it isn't canonical richi: in this case I believe they have the same operand priority, so there is no canonical order we could of course change that I wonder whether an arbitrary order would help? generally not, but for avoiding pattern explosion yes it can't be done in commutative_operand_precedence (rtx op) because it doesn't see both operands but we can assign a different precedence for rshift vs lshift? and there are numerous commutative_operand_precedence callers, so changing it just in swap_commutative_operands_p might not be enough can't we just assign a different number to left shift, right shift, etc? (their enum value?) marcg: I'm afraid it would penalize code unnecessarily marcg: the only case you want to treat specially is if one operand is left shift and one is right shift jakub: I'm not sure - why dont' we want canonical form of say a<<3 | (b + 1) as well? marcg: if you use different priority for <<, >> and the rest of binary operations, why would you be swapping the operands? I don't really see how that would penalize code. Me neither. marcg: it can increase register pressure or similar (or decrease of course), it is one further thing where it changes code from what user originally wrote unnecessarily Although it might force a lot of trivial reordering in .md files, not sure. ah, I see. So maybe find a way to only _try_ it and drop it if it doesn't help. seems more complicated already :-( I think what makes more sense is that the combiner if both operands of a commutative expression have the same precedence, if the original order doesn't match, tries also the other order jakub: That's not pessimization in my book, but shuffling with unclear effects. The solution to that problem, if it is one, is not to generally avoid swapping operands, but instead to improve the register allocator for instance. jakub: that sounds reasonable jakub: though in general duplicates work (maybe only if RTX_CODE of the ops is different) I think canonicalization as much as possible is better. we can simply have a special combine variant of the precedence in any case, not a 4.8 thing, if you change canonicalization, it might take months to catch up in various backends thus make combine select a more canonical variant for matching patterns but not change the IL I bet the reason it's currently not implemented is not because somebody conciously decided that it would shuffle too much, but rather simply because nobody bothered until now, so it seems premature caution to worry about potential performance effects. richi: Yes, we could. We could do many thing. The question is, why should we? jakub: yes, of course not for 4.8. marcg: IMHO if you want something for 4.8, just duplicate the pattern, or write it using some macro where it will match any direction of shift on either side and in the pattern condition test that the direction is different I don't want anything for 4.8, I am only interested in long term here :-) but that may still be a good idea except that there is a constraint on the left shift argument being the same as the output that breaks symmetry and complicates things... anyway, I never hit that pattern myself, it was more a general question because I had already wondered about it for other patterns in the past. or not even a code iterator, you can use match_operator which would check for logical left/right shift canonicalizing still has limits. For instance, getting a canonical order between ve
[Bug debug/54774] insufficient debug info for strong typed enum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7] |insufficient debug info for |insufficient debug info for |strong typed enum |strong typed enum | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 20:38:45 UTC --- But it isn't a regression, so Summary shouldn't be changed for that fact. You can fill in Known to work: (guess empty) and Known to fail:.
[Bug fortran/55395] [4.8 Regression] libgfortran bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 20:35:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 6 20:34:55 2012 New Revision: 194272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194272 Log: PR fortran/55395 * varpool.c (varpool_remove_node): Don't drop DECL_INITIAL if -g and emitting DWARF2+. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/varpool.c
[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:23:16 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] qualified lookup in ctor of class template fails to find static member of reference type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:23:05 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54744] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:22:44 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7.3.
[Bug c++/54744] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:21:58 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 20:21:44 2012 New Revision: 194269 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194269 Log: PR c++/54744 * pt.c (resolve_typename_type): Check TYPENAME_IS_RESOLVING_P on scope. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit3.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:21:44 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 20:21:29 2012 New Revision: 194268 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194268 Log: PR c++/55032 * tree.c (build_array_type_1): Re-layout if we found it in the hash table. Added: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array24.C Modified: branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/tree.c
[Bug c++/54744] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:21:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 20:21:08 2012 New Revision: 194267 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194267 Log: PR c++/54744 * pt.c (resolve_typename_type): Check TYPENAME_IS_RESOLVING_P on scope. * init.c (expand_member_init): Check for being in a template first. * parser.c (cp_parser_mem_initializer_list): Only check class types for equivalence to the current class. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/meminit3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/init.c trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] qualified lookup in ctor of class template fails to find static member of reference type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:21:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 20:20:52 2012 New Revision: 194266 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194266 Log: PR c++/54913 * semantics.c (finish_qualified_id_expr): convert_from_reference after building a SCOPE_REF. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/qualified-id6.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c
[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 20:20:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 20:20:34 2012 New Revision: 194265 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194265 Log: PR c++/55032 * tree.c (build_array_type_1): Re-layout if we found it in the hash table. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/array24.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree.c
[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-12-06 20:14:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> It works. Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately it creates GC garbage often unnecessary, when it won't be used
> at
> all.
I agree. Let's keep zext together with their users:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c (revision 194263)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@ -12785,6 +12785,9 @@
tp = get_thread_pointer (Pmode, true);
dest = force_reg (Pmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tp, dest));
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL, x);
}
else
@@ -12793,15 +12796,20 @@
if (TARGET_64BIT)
{
- rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG), insns;
+ rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
+ rtx insns;
start_sequence ();
- emit_call_insn (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64 (rax, x,
- caddr));
+ emit_call_insn
+ (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64 (rax, x, caddr));
insns = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
RTL_CONST_CALL_P (insns) = 1;
+
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
emit_libcall_block (insns, dest, rax, x);
}
else
@@ -12842,11 +12850,12 @@
if (TARGET_64BIT)
{
- rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG), insns, eqv;
+ rtx rax = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, AX_REG);
+ rtx insns, eqv;
start_sequence ();
- emit_call_insn (ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64 (rax,
- caddr));
+ emit_call_insn
+ (ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64 (rax, caddr));
insns = get_insns ();
end_sequence ();
@@ -12871,6 +12880,9 @@
{
dest = force_reg (Pmode, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, dest, tp));
+ if (GET_MODE (x) != Pmode)
+ x = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (Pmode, x);
+
set_unique_reg_note (get_last_insn (), REG_EQUAL, x);
}
break;
--cut here--
[Bug gcov-profile/49484] gcov crash if two(or more) forks happen at the same time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #26 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 20:09:35 UTC ---
Author: asharif
Date: Thu Dec 6 20:09:25 2012
New Revision: 194264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194264
Log:
2012-12-03 Ahmad Sharif
Backport r185231 from trunk.
2012-03-12 Richard Guenther
* gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
* gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
(__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function.
* gthr-single.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
PR gcov/49484
* libgcov.c: Include gthr.h.
(__gcov_flush_mx): New global variable.
(init_mx, init_mx_once): New functions.
(__gcov_flush): Protect self with a mutex.
(__gcov_fork): Re-initialize mutex after forking.
* unwind-dw2-fde.c: Change condition under which to use
__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION.
Modified:
branches/google/gcc-4_7/ (props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7/gcc/ (props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-round.c
(props changed)
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/ChangeLog
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/ChangeLog.google-4_7
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/gthr-single.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/gthr.h
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/libgcov.c
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
branches/google/gcc-4_7/libjava/classpath/ (props changed)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7/gcc/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange:
branches/google/gcc-4_7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-round.c
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
Propchange: branches/google/gcc-4_7/libjava/classpath/
('svn:mergeinfo' modified)
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org |
[Bug debug/54774] [4.4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7] insufficient debug info for strong typed enum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774 chihin ko changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|insufficient debug info for |[4.4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7] |strong typed enum |insufficient debug info for ||strong typed enum --- Comment #3 from chihin ko 2012-12-06 19:57:46 UTC --- This problem can trace back from gcc 4.4.4.
[Bug c/39464] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Attribute may_alias causes invalid warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-06 19:29:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > warning to actual sign differences only, i.e. > else if (warn_pointer_sign >&& TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvl) != TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvr)) > If we want to warn about other cases (I think they are generally outside of > the > scope of ISO C anyway), then we should have a differently worded warning after > this one for the TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvl) == TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvr) case. The only case which is not outside of the scope of ISO C is "char" vs "signed char" vs "unsigned char" They are all three distinct types and we should get a warning about them.
[Bug libstdc++/55594] [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile line of all targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2012-12-06 19:25:05 UTC --- AIX as manual: -n Name Specifies the name that appears in the header of the assembler listing. By default, the header contains the name of the assembler source file. -Wa,-nH creates some confusing, inconsistent information for debugging and object file analysis. Because I do not spend a lot of time debugging libstdc++, I had not noticed it. I am glad that you are feeling better.
[Bug c++/54207] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression][C++0x] |[4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE |ICE in build_noexcept_spec |in build_noexcept_spec when |when bool is|bool is #defined/typedef'd |#defined/typedef'd | Known to fail|4.8.0 | --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 19:15:54 UTC --- Fixed on the trunk so far.
[Bug c++/55573] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6454
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 19:15:07 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54207] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 18:55:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 6 18:55:48 2012 New Revision: 194263 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194263 Log: PR c++/54207 * except.c (build_noexcept_spec): Avoid direct comparison with boolean_true_node or boolean_false_node, instead use operand_equal_p and/or INTEGER_CST check. * pt.c (tsubst_exception_specification): Likewise. * typeck2.c (merge_exception_specifiers): Likewise. * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept18.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept18.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/except.c trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/cp/typeck2.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug c++/55573] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6454
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55573 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 18:54:30 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 6 18:54:25 2012 New Revision: 194262 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194262 Log: PR c++/55573 * semantics.c (adjust_temp_type): Handle VECTOR_CST. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-55573.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-55573.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 18:39:03 UTC --- For the bootstrap comparison failures, I'd guess libbacktrace should be built with -frandom-seed=$@ in CFLAGS similarly how libstdc++-v3 is built. In what way doesn't backtrace work in the compiler? Does it crash, or not print any backtrace? The former would be a regression, the latter would not. So, does: 2012-12-06 Jakub Jelinek PR bootstrap/54926 * Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -frandom-seed=$@. * Makefile.in: Regenerated. --- libbacktrace/Makefile.am.jj2012-10-02 15:36:21.0 +0200 +++ libbacktrace/Makefile.am2012-12-06 19:36:05.888001803 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \ -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/include -AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) +AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@ noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la --- libbacktrace/Makefile.in.jj2012-10-02 15:36:21.0 +0200 +++ libbacktrace/Makefile.in2012-12-06 19:36:26.284875521 +0100 @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config AM_CPPFLAGS = -I $(top_srcdir)/../include -I $(top_srcdir)/../libgcc \ -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I $(MULTIBUILDTOP)../../gcc/include -AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) +AM_CFLAGS = $(EXTRA_FLAGS) $(WARN_FLAGS) $(PIC_FLAG) -frandom-seed=$@ noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libbacktrace.la libbacktrace_la_SOURCES = \ backtrace.h \ patch fix all the regressions, turning this just into enhancement request to support libbacktrace better on HP-UX?
[Bug c/39464] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Attribute may_alias causes invalid warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06
18:27:03 UTC ---
In any case, I'd limit the
/* If there is a mismatch, do warn. */
else if (warn_pointer_sign)
WARN_FOR_ASSIGNMENT (location, OPT_Wpointer_sign,
G_("pointer targets in passing argument "
"%d of %qE differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in assignment "
"differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in initialization "
"differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in return differ "
"in signedness"));
warning to actual sign differences only, i.e.
else if (warn_pointer_sign
&& TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvl) != TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvr))
If we want to warn about other cases (I think they are generally outside of the
scope of ISO C anyway), then we should have a differently worded warning after
this one for the TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvl) == TYPE_UNSIGNED (mvr) case.
[Bug c/39464] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Attribute may_alias causes invalid warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06
18:21:09 UTC ---
In any case, I'd limit the
/* If there is a mismatch, do warn. */
else if (warn_pointer_sign)
WARN_FOR_ASSIGNMENT (location, OPT_Wpointer_sign,
G_("pointer targets in passing argument "
"%d of %qE differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in assignment "
"differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in initialization "
"differ in signedness"),
G_("pointer targets in return differ "
"in signedness"));
warning to actual sign differences only, i.e.
[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-06 17:54:44 UTC --- Note that on Mountain Lion using the 10.7 SDK solves the failures... # /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -fnext-runtime -mno-constant-cfstrings -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/./libobjc/.libs -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/./libobjc/.libs -S -m64 --sysroot=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.7.sdk -o const-str-10.s #
[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 --- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-06 17:49:06 UTC --- This may be related to the changes described here... http://blog.ablepear.com/2012/02/something-wonderful-new-objective-c.html
[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-06 17:41:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Fixed? Note on x86_64-apple-darwin12 which uses a newer Objective C runtime. There are failures in... FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O0 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O1 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O2 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O3 -g -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -Os -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O0 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O1 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O2 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O3 -g -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -Os -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O0 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O1 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O2 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O3 -g -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -Os -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-9.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string1.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string1.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string2.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string2.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string3.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string3.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string4.m -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/string4.m -O2 -flto -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) of the form... Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -fnext-runtime -mno-constant-cfstrings -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/./libobjc/.libs -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/./libobjc/.libs -S -m64 -o const-str-10.s(timeout = 300) /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m:13:1: error: cannot find interface declaration for 'Object', superclass of 'NSString'^M /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m:31:1: error: interface 'NSConstantString' does not have valid constant string layout^M compiler exited with status 1 output is: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m:13:1: error: cannot find interface declaration for 'Object', superclass of 'NSString'^M /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121206/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m:31:1: error: interface 'NSConstantString' does not have valid constant string layout^M FAIL: objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m -O0 -fnext-runtime (test for excess errors)
[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 17:00:35 UTC --- I don't see the #c0 testcase particularly slow, I'm afraid we won't get rid of all the slowdowns caused by the memory invalidation checking in var-tracking.c, that has been added for 4.8 for debug information accuracy (to avoid emitting wrong-debug, not just incomplete debug), but hope it can be speeded up at least a little bit. And as one comment in this PR and another one in another PR show, there is also a regression that LRA makes some functions that were previously without frame pointer now use forcefully frame pointer. It needs investigation whether that is just a bug somewhere, or intentional decision.
[Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org |
[Bug debug/55579] SRA doesn't create debug stmts when they would be useful
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55579 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2012-12-06 16:58:58 UTC --- Mine.
[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-06 16:56:35 UTC --- > --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 > 16:41:45 UTC --- > Improvements so that the regression part is fixed? Not on Solaris/SPARC, unfortunately: there are still compilations in the libgo testsuite that take more than a day, which with PR go/54507 effectivly breaks unattended Solaris/SPARC bootstraps since they take insanely long. Rainer
[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test "rnflow" degraded
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 16:51:11 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4
[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||windows Priority|P3 |P1
[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1
[Bug tree-optimization/54094] ICE in graphite-dependences.c:320 : isl_constraint.c:497: position out of bounds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06
16:44:44 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
void dwt_deinterleave_h(int *a, int *b, int dn, int sn, int cas)
{
int i;
for (i=0; i
[Bug target/54404] [4.8 Regression] *cfstring* failures for (obj-c|g)++ on *-apple-darwin* after revision 186978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 16:42:51 UTC --- Fixed?
[Bug tree-optimization/54094] ICE in graphite-dependences.c:320 : isl_constraint.c:497: position out of bounds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-pc-cygwin |i?86-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Host|i686-pc-cygwin | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[4.8 regression] ICE in |ICE in |graphite-dependences.c:320 |graphite-dependences.c:320 |: isl_constraint.c:497: |: isl_constraint.c:497: |position out of bounds |position out of bounds Target Milestone|4.8.0 |--- Build|i686-pc-cygwin | --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 16:40:54 UTC --- Requires -floop-nest-optimize to reproduce so technically not a regression. But confirmed on x86_64-linux with -m32. Reducing.
[Bug c++/55576] Fails to compile a call to template member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Resolution|INVALID | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 16:33:09 UTC --- 3.4.5 seems clear on this point: The identifier is first looked up in the class of the object expression. If the identifier is not found, it is then looked up in the context of the entire postfix-expression and shall name a class template. So the testcase in comment 3 is valid.
[Bug libstdc++/55594] [4.8 Regression] -Wa,-nH incorrectly added to compile line of all targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ro at CeBiTec dot |ro at gcc dot gnu.org |Uni-Bielefeld.DE| AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ro at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-12-06 16:29:59 UTC --- Mine. Sorry for the delay, I've been ill for two weeks and am slowly catching up on my mail. Two questions: * What does -nH do with AIX as? * Which problems does this cause, i.e. why did this issue only show up almost three months after the patch went in. Rainer
[Bug lto/53831] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Virtuals missing in LTO symtab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 16:24:19 UTC --- Is this fixed on trunk?
[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug debug/51358] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |--- Summary|[4.8 Regression]|incorrect/missing location |incorrect/missing location |for function arg, -O0, |for function arg, -O0, |without VTA |without VTA | --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2012-12-06 16:21:33 UTC --- Don't see that either.
[Bug debug/55541] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] unable to see local variables due extra lexical block was generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|4.8.0 | Known to fail||4.8.0
[Bug c++/55249] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Multiple copy constructors for template class lead to link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/55245] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug target/55181] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expensive shift loop where a bit-testing instruction could be used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|P3 |P4 Component|other |target
[Bug debug/55094] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/55058] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type conversion error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7/4.8 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work||4.6.3
[Bug c++/54383] Internal compiler error for lamba function using this-> with -std=c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Ever Confirmed|0 |1
[Bug c++/54995] Converting lambda to C-style functions when there is template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Version|unknown |4.8.0 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-06 16:00:31 UTC --- I think the code should be rejected. Possibly related to Bug 55532 (Temtaine, in future please provide code, not a URL to some other site, thanks)
[Bug c++/55532] Runtime segfault calling mutable lambda wrapped in a non-mutable lambda within a template function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55532 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-06 15:54:18 UTC --- Confirmed, I think the code should be rejected.
[Bug c++/54744] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, by dependent base, member typedef and ctor-initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54744 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org |
[Bug c++/55576] Fails to compile a call to template member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-06 15:46:59 UTC --- Jason, could you have a look at the code in comment 3 and say whether the lookup result is correct? thanks
[Bug c++/55015] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Lambda functions not found at link time when declared in an inline function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at godbolt dot org --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-06 15:44:50 UTC --- *** Bug 54801 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/54801] [4.7/4.8 Regression] static variables constructed with lambda params inside member functions cause undefined errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-06 15:44:50 UTC --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55015 ***
[Bug c++/55127] [4.8 regression] Incorrect "dependent scope" error with partial specialization of non-type parameter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-12-06 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-06 15:32:52 UTC --- Confirmed.
[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] qualified lookup in ctor of class template fails to find static member of reference type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org |
[Bug target/55610] cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-06 15:27:51 UTC --- Sorry, that should have been "Nick wasn't able to completely backtrace in cc1 due to the default use of -fomit-frame-pointer in FSF gcc".
[Bug target/55610] cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-06 15:25:04 UTC --- This was originally opened as http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14140 but closed there now as it is determined to be a latent bug in FSF gcc's darwin_gt_pch_use_address call. Also, Nick was able to completely back trace this issue because gcc defaults now to -fomit-frame-pointers. We will need to revert that change in order to get a complete backtrace out of cc1.
[Bug target/55610] New: cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610 Bug #: 55610 Summary: cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself on darwin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: howa...@nitro.med.uc.edu The use of the dragonegg.so plugin with the LLVMPolly.so plugin exposes a flaw where when dyld queries for free memory it is getting a block in the middle of gcc4.7's __DATA segment. The cc1 binary has a 1GB __DATA segment which is huge, but should work, but somehow LLVMPolly.so is being loaded into the middle of the cc1's DATA segment. That causes problems with lazy binding because dyld has a data structure to map from an address to an image. That data structure assumes mach-o images do not overlap. So when dyld is trying to find which image is requesting the lazy binding, it thinks it is cc1 when in fact LLVMPolly.so is requesting the lazy binding. This leads to the binding error. Why does this cc1 have such a huge __DATA segment? Most of the room is in the __bss12 section. Is there some code that calls vm_deallocate on the interior of the __DATA segment? size -l /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1 Segment __PAGEZERO: 4294967296 (vmaddr 0x0 fileoff 0) Segment __TEXT: 11014144 (vmaddr 0x1 fileoff 0) Section __text: 8725244 (addr 0x10c80 offset 3200) Section __text_startup: 5 (addr 0x100852f80 offset 8728448) Section __text_cold: 69721 (addr 0x100852f88 offset 8728456) Section __stubs: 984 (addr 0x100863fe2 offset 8798178) Section __stub_helper: 1656 (addr 0x1008643bc offset 8799164) Section __cstring: 573443 (addr 0x100864a38 offset 8800824) Section __const: 534272 (addr 0x1008f0a40 offset 9374272) Section __eh_frame: 1105584 (addr 0x100973140 offset 9908544) total 11010909 Segment __DATA: 1075826688 (vmaddr 0x100a81000 fileoff 11014144) Section __got: 816 (addr 0x100a81000 offset 11014144) Section __nl_symbol_ptr: 16 (addr 0x100a81330 offset 11014960) Section __la_symbol_ptr: 1312 (addr 0x100a81340 offset 11014976) Section __const: 598856 (addr 0x100a81860 offset 11016288) Section __data: 41152 (addr 0x100b13bc0 offset 11615168) Section __static_data: 136 (addr 0x100b1dc80 offset 11656320) Section __pu_bss5: 1202272 (addr 0x100b1dd20 offset 0) Section __bss4: 792 (addr 0x100c43580 offset 0) Section __bss2: 1640 (addr 0x100c43898 offset 0) Section __bss0: 26 (addr 0x100c43f00 offset 0) Section __pu_bss4: 112 (addr 0x100c43f20 offset 0) Section __pu_bss0: 5 (addr 0x100c43f90 offset 0) Section __common: 24 (addr 0x100c43f98 offset 0) Section __pu_bss2: 496 (addr 0x100c43fb0 offset 0) Section __bss12: 1073741824 (addr 0x100c45000 offset 0) Section __bss5: 221067 (addr 0x140c45000 offset 0) Section __bss3: 7632 (addr 0x140c7af90 offset 0) Section __pu_bss3: 1432 (addr 0x140c7cd60 offset 0) total 1075819610 Segment __LINKEDIT: 3719168 (vmaddr 0x140c7e000 fileoff 11661312) For the FSF gcc 4.7.2/dragonegg/LLVMPolly.so combination cc1 is calling munmap() on part of itself which is not legal. If we skip over that munmap, the program runs fine. (gdb) set env DYLD_PRINT_SEGMENTS (gdb) br munmap (gdb) r dyld: Main executable mapped /sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/4.7.2/cc1 __PAGEZERO at 0x->0x1 __TEXT at 0x1->0x100A81000 __DATA at 0x100A81000->0x140C7E000 __LINKEDIT at 0x140C7E000->0x14100A000 ... Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $17 = 0x14122e000 $18 = 0xd2000 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $19 = 0x14140 $20 = 0x2e000 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $21 = 0x14140 $22 = 0x40 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $23 = 0x14200 $24 = 0x40 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $26 = 0x144ba3000 $27 = 0x5d000 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 14, 0x7fff86b94fbc in munmap () 1: x/i $pc 0x7fff86b94fbc :mov$0x249,%eax $28 = 0x144d0 $29 = 0xa3000 (gdb) c Continuing. GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.2 (x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0) compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2, GMP version 5.0.5,
[Bug debug/55541] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] unable to see local variables due extra lexical block was generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 15:07:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm finding the LOCATION_BLOCK code somewhat opaque, and think that I should > take care of more recent regressions before diving into it too much, so I'm > going to put this aside for now. > > I don't remember the rationale for the extra block, but changing > finish_function to strip it right away causes quite a few testsuite > regressions. Can you attach your patch anyway, both for future reference and to find out why it causes testsuite regressions? I'm really curious...
[Bug middle-end/55597] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 15:05:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I think it is better to fixup all sites where equivalent is used: > > > > It works. Thanks. Unfortunately it creates GC garbage often unnecessary, when it won't be used at all.
[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-06 14:47:26 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 14:46:18 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7.3.
[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 14:45:15 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Dec 6 14:45:11 2012 New Revision: 194256 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194256 Log: PR c++/54947 * parser.c (cp_parser_initializer_list): Don't require an expression in [] to be constant until we know it's a C99 designator. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-initlist2.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
[Bug c++/55015] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Lambda functions not found at link time when declared in an inline function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 14:42:45 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7.3.
[Bug c++/55564] [4.8 Regression] internal error using decltype of a template type parameter for late-specified function result type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 14:42:08 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/54653] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] tsubst_template_parms ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54653 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.8.0 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-06 14:41:42 UTC --- Fixed for 4.8, not backporting fixes for invalid code bugs.
