[Bug middle-end/59059] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:6931
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59059 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||congh at google dot com, ||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz ||.ch --- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- has been reported on the list but not bugzilla I think: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00946.html
[Bug tree-optimization/59058] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59058
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For the vectorizer issue on trunk, this is enough:
int printf (const char *, ...);
short b = 0;
int
main ()
{
int c = 0;
l1:
b++;
c |= b;
if (b)
goto l1;
printf (%d\n, c);
return 0;
}
This code relies on the gcc extension that casting to a shorter integer is done
modulo 2. Note that if we move the declaration of b inside the function, the
compiler (wrongly?) warns:
s.c:11:4: warning: iteration 32767u invokes undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
b++;
^
s.c:13:6: note: containing loop
if (b)
^
(and the return value changes from 7 to 131071)
2 missed optimizations while looking at the dumps:
stmp_var_.12_46 = _4 + 1;
stmp_var_.12_47 = _4 + 2;
stmp_var_.12_48 = _4 + 3;
stmp_var_.12_49 = _4 + 4;
stmp_var_.12_50 = _4 + 5;
stmp_var_.12_51 = _4 + 6;
stmp_var_.12_52 = _4 + 7;
vect_cst_.13_53 = {_4, stmp_var_.12_46, stmp_var_.12_47, stmp_var_.12_48,
stmp_var_.12_49, stmp_var_.12_50, stmp_var_.12_51, stmp_var_.12_52};
This should really be:
v = { _4, _4, ... };
w = v + { 0, 1, 2, ... };
Also:
vector(8) unsigned short vect_b.17;
vector(8) short int vect_vec_iv_.16;
vector(8) unsigned short vect_vec_iv_.15;
[...]
vect_vec_iv_.16_57 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRvector(8) short
int(vect_vec_iv_.15_55);
vect_vec_iv_.15_56 = vect_vec_iv_.15_55 + vect_cst_.14_54;
vect_b.17_58 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRvector(8) unsigned
short(vect_vec_iv_.16_57);
vect_b.17_58 is vect_vec_iv_.15_55, not sure why we don't see through that.
[Bug sanitizer/59061] New: Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 Bug ID: 59061 Summary: Port leaksanitizer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org Clearly an enhancement request, but it would be great to have leaksanitizer ported to gcc. Will this make the 4.9 release ?
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz ||.ch Severity|normal |enhancement
[Bug fortran/59060] Accepts invalid ? Missing component data value for component D1 of TYPE(T2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is in Fortran 2003: R457 structure-constructor is derived-type-spec ( [ component-spec-list ] ) C485 (R457) A component-spec shall be provided for a component unless it has default initialization or is inheritance associated with another component for which a component-spec is provided or that has default initialization. C488 (R457) The type name and all components of the type for which a component-spec appears shall be accessible in the scoping unit containing the structure constructor. Thus, it looks like valid Fortran 2003 to me.
[Bug fortran/59060] Accepts invalid ? Missing component data value for component D1 of TYPE(T2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- For completeness, the feature was added 2008-05-16 in r135410.
[Bug fortran/59060] Accepts invalid ? Missing component data value for component D1 of TYPE(T2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- Thanks, I indeed start thinking gfortran has it right. As a small variant: MODULE M1 TYPE T1 INTEGER, PRIVATE :: I=0 END TYPE T1 TYPE T2 TYPE(T1) :: D1 END TYPE T2 TYPE(T2), PARAMETER :: D2 END MODULE M1 All of cray, intel and pgi complain about this along the lines: bug.f90(8): error #6557: An =initialization-expr is missing; an initialization expression is required when using the PARAMETER attribute. [D2] TYPE(T2), PARAMETER :: D2 ^ gfortran accepts this... this could be right again, since all components ultimately have a default initialization.
[Bug c/59039] Undocumented __builtin_longjmp/__builtin_setjmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does it look OK?
Mostly, but I wouldn't go into full details about what contains the buffer,
this is machine-specific and not portable. Maybe something like:
The @code{setjmp} buffer is an array of five @code{intptr_t}. The buffer
will generally contain the frame address, the resume address and the stack
address. The other elements may be used in a machine-specific way.
[Bug libstdc++/58982] [4.9 Regression] std::vectorstd::atomicint vai(10); does not compile anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Sat Nov 9 12:38:00 2013 New Revision: 204615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204615root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/58982 * include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__copy_move::__copy_m): Use assertion to prevent using memmove() on non-assignable types. (__copy_move_backward::__copy_move_b): Likewise. * include/bits/stl_uninitialized.h (uninitialized_copy uninitialized_copy_n, uninitialized_fill, uninitialized_fill_n, __uninitialized_default, __uninitialized_default_n): Check for assignable as well as trivial. * testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_copy/ 58982.cc: New. * testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_copy_n/ 58982.cc: New. * testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_fill/ 58982.cc: New. * testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_fill_n/ 58982.cc: New. * testsuite/25_algorithms/copy/58982.cc: New. * testsuite/25_algorithms/copy_n/58982.cc: New. Added: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_copy/58982.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_copy_n/58982.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_fill/58982.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_fill_n/58982.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/copy/58982.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/25_algorithms/copy_n/58982.cc Modified: trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_uninitialized.h
[Bug libstdc++/58982] [4.9 Regression] std::vectorstd::atomicint vai(10); does not compile anymore
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58982 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com | Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed
[Bug c++/59056] enable_if turns a non-ambiguous template into an ambiguous one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I must be misunderstanding something, because rewriting the class template
partial specializations as function templates (as per [temp.class.order]) shows
that one is more specialized than the other, as the functions are not
ambiguous:
#include type_traits
template class T class Foo {};
template class X
constexpr bool check()
{
return true;
}
template class X, class Enable = void
struct Bar {};
templateclass X
void func(BarX, typename std::enable_if checkX() ::type) { }
templateclass T
int func(BarFooT) { return 0; }
void instance()
{
Bar Fooint av;
int i = func(av);
}
I thought if the partial specializations were ambiguous then these function
overloads should be too.
[Bug fortran/59060] Accepts invalid ? Missing component data value for component D1 of TYPE(T2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59060 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4) gfortran accepts this... this could be right again, since all components ultimately have a default initialization. must have been a pilot error... I'm closing this as invalid.
[Bug middle-end/59059] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:6931
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59059 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- This is fixed by the patch for pr59050 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00944.html . Closing as duplicate of pr59050. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 59050 ***
[Bug tree-optimization/59050] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:7083
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59050 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz ||.ch --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- *** Bug 59059 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 --- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- It should be there already: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204368root=gccview=rev Please check. admittedly, the gcc tree lacks the tests for lsan.
[Bug tree-optimization/59062] New: poor code generated at -Os (affecting all gcc versions): 10+ sec vs. 1 sec at -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59062
Bug ID: 59062
Summary: poor code generated at -Os (affecting all gcc
versions): 10+ sec vs. 1 sec at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
The current gcc trunk (as well as 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8) produces poor code for the
following testcase on x86_64-linux-gnu at -Os in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
The produced code has the same or very similar size.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131109 (experimental) [trunk revision 204611] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c
$ time a.out
1.02user 0.00system 0:01.05elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1584maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+142minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ time a.out
0.68user 0.00system 0:00.68elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1568maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+140minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c
$ time a.out
12.84user 0.00system 0:12.86elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1568maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+140minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$
#pragma pack(1)
struct
{
int f0:23;
unsigned int f1:23;
unsigned int f2:7;
} b, c;
unsigned int a;
int
main ()
{
for (; a != 14; a += 9)
c = b;
return 0;
}
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 --- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1) It should be there already: triggering my report was indeed some vague memory that the recent merge would bring leaksanitizer... I didn't see it mentioned on the list or doc changes or so. So, how does it work, is it part of -fsanitize=address (doesn't seem to do that) or is there a new option -fsanitize=leaks ?
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 --- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/LeakSanitizer I agree, we need to update the gcc doc to mention the URL above.
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- That's great... works even for Fortran code :-) One more question the docs mention: In performance-critical scenarios, LSan can also be used without ASan instrumentation. But it is unclear from that description how that would work.. any hints ?
[Bug regression/58985] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/pr57518.c scan-rtl-dump-not ira REG_EQUIV...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- The version of the test case on 4.8 branch is still missing Marcus Shawcroft's regex fix (r200720), causing it to fail on some targets (including at least sparc).
[Bug sanitizer/59063] New: [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 Bug ID: 59063 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org with -fsanitize=address the following code works on 4.8 branch bug segfaults with 4.9 cat test.f90 INTEGER, SAVE :: count_max, count_rate CALL SYSTEM_CLOCK(count_rate=count_rate,count_max=count_max) END gfortran -fsanitize=address test.f90 ; ./a.out ASAN:SIGSEGV = ==48940==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x (pc 0x sp 0x7fff97430008 bp 0x7fff97430040 T0) AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. ==48940==ABORTING Under gdb the bt is: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x in ?? () #1 0x76b76278 in __interceptor_clock_gettime (clk_id=optimized out, tp=0x7fffd6e0) at ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:740 #2 0x76b1efbc in gf_gettime_mono (tck=synthetic pointer, fracsecs=synthetic pointer, secs=synthetic pointer) at ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c:98 #3 _gfortran_system_clock_4 (count=0x0, count_rate=0x600f60 count_rate.1893, count_max=0x600fa0 count_max.1892) at ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c:147 #4 0x0040089d in MAIN__ () #5 0x004008d3 in main ()
[Bug tree-optimization/15357] [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed by: 2013-10-29 Andrew Pinski apin...@cavium.com * tree-ssa-ifcombine.c: Include rtl.h and tm_p.h. (ifcombine_ifandif): Handle cases where maybe_fold_and_comparisons fails, combining the branches anyways. (tree_ssa_ifcombine): Inverse the order of the basic block walk, increases the number of combinings. * gimple.h (gsi_start_nondebug_after_labels_bb): New function.
[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052 Bug 14052 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15241] [tree-ssa] Convert a = 7 b = 7 into (a | b) = 7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15241 Bug 15241 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15352] [tree-ssa] missed jump threading opportunity due to lack of short circuit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15352 Bug 15352 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15911] VRP/DOM does not like TRUTH_AND_EXPR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15911 Bug 15911 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15353] [tree-ssa] Merge two ifs if one subsumes the other.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15353 Bug 15353 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x 0) || (y 0) into (x | y) 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Bug 15348 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/13965] [tree-ssa] fold takes into account branch target information at tree level
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13965 Bug 13965 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug middle-end/23869] Missed optimization with integer booleans when compiling for pentium and higher
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23869 Bug 23869 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/58956] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
gcc 4.5.4 and 4.4.7 are also broken, but 4.3.6 is Ok. Started with r142396.
The effect of that revision is that
{
struct S *i = c;
*i = foo ();
is compiled as if it had been written
{
struct S tmp = foo ();
*c = tmp;
which is wrong since foo may (and in this case does) change c.
[Bug tree-optimization/51988] value_replacement in PHIOPT should handle even the cases where there are other PHIs even with non equal value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51988 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed for a while now.
[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
[Bug target/57836] large constants evaluated inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57836 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-09 Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
[Bug c++/57883] Feature request: better diagnostic for unknown type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57883 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. There might be a dup bug about unknown types giving bad diagnostics.
[Bug middle-end/57859] -ftrapv does not trap on signed overflows for struct fields (32-bit mode)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57859 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- -ftrapv is very broken right now. There are some changes going to happen to add -fundefined=overflow soon which should replace fully -ftrapv to be more correct implementation.
[Bug target/57890] gcc 4.8.1 regression: loops become slower
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-linux-gnu Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- There have been some improvements of memset recently for x86_64. Also note on many other targets doing this transformation is actually a speed up.
[Bug c++/57946] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in int_fits_type_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57946 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5 Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4 Summary|internal compiler error:|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] |Segmentation fault in |internal compiler error: |int_fits_type_p |Segmentation fault in ||int_fits_type_p Known to fail||4.7.0, 4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. 4.4.5 shows: t99.cc:1: error: conversion to incomplete type
[Bug target/57847] Compile ARM linux kernel with configuration of SLUB allocator, kernel failed to boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57847 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in 3 months so closing.
[Bug tree-optimization/57999] Missed constant propagation into trampolines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57999 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed, we don't have any IPA based on optimizations on nested functions.
[Bug c++/58116] missed-optimization: const temporaries could be promoted to static
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58116 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think there is a duplicated bug of this already.
[Bug driver/25179] precedence of -fpie over -fpic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This has been fixed by: 2012-11-13 Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com * common.opt (fPIC, fPIE, fpic, fpie): Create a Negative loop such that any of these options disables the others.
[Bug target/24842] testsuite failure: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c execution test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24842 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over a year so closing.
[Bug bootstrap/30775] Bootstrap segmentation faults checking for sqrtl declaration...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30775 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over a year now so closing.
[Bug bootstrap/34881] Bootstrap fails on building libstdc++: can't find file for: -lgcc_s.10.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34881 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over a year now so closing.
[Bug middle-end/34803] wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34803 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Closing as invalid as there have been no feedback in over a year now.
[Bug c/56584] _int_free assertion failed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over 6 months so closing.
[Bug other/53489] suggest a feature for gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53489 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- There has no movement in either money or interest in adding a C# front-end to GCC so closing as invalid.
[Bug other/53969] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on Android(use NDK)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over a year so closing.
[Bug tree-optimization/53092] ICE using -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53092 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- NO feedback in over a year so closing as invalid.
[Bug middle-end/52334] The user of zero register is wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No testcase in the last year so closing as invalid.
[Bug middle-end/49435] get_z.c:46: MPFR assertion failed: exp 0 || exp = ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)1))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback on information about mpfr/gmp so closing as invalid. This target is known to work and does for others.
[Bug middle-end/50397] openssl crash due to incorrect codegen when using LTO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No feedback in over a year so closing.
[Bug middle-end/59049] Two VOIDmode constant in comparison passed to cstoresi4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59049 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- We do have a missed optimization due to fab being done so late.
[Bug target/57890] gcc 4.8.1 regression: loops become slower
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 55953 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug target/55953] hand loop faster then builtin memset
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55953 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57890 ***
[Bug lto/58723] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto_output_edge, at lto-cgraph.c:300 for OpenMP's simd reduction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-11-10
CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
Summary|ICE in lto_output_edge, at |[4.9 Regression] ICE in
|lto-cgraph.c:300 for|lto_output_edge, at
|OpenMP's simd reduction |lto-cgraph.c:300 for
||OpenMP's simd reduction
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.9.0
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed.
Even shorter testcase (compile with -O -flto -fopenmp):
===
void foo(int n)
{
int i;
#pragma omp simd reduction(+:n)
for (i = 0; i 99; ++i) ;
}
===
The regression appeared between 4.9-20131005 and 4.9.0-20131012.
[Bug sanitizer/59061] Port leaksanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061 --- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4) That's great... works even for Fortran code :-) Wow! One more question the docs mention: In performance-critical scenarios, LSan can also be used without ASan instrumentation. But it is unclear from that description how that would work.. any hints ? Clang supports -fsanitize=leak which simply links a standalone lsan library (no instrumentation at compile time required). Perhaps gcc can add such option too. But: we do not test -fsanitize=leak on anything other than tiny tests, so we truly support only the lsan+asan use case. We'll need to update the wiki page to have this all explained in detail, thanks for raising these questions.
[Bug libfortran/38199] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] missed optimization: I/O performance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 --- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Test case from Comment #22 ifort: real0m0.608s user0m0.464s sys0m0.080s gfortran: real0m22.893s user0m21.059s sys0m0.152s Obviously we could do better.
[Bug target/47740] new specs function to avoid vxworks cross compiler requiring environment variable to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47740 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patches should goto gcc-patches@ rather than here.
[Bug preprocessor/47756] Warning for #include instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47756 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Using will work anyways as is defined to look at the same directory of after looking at the ones for . So Again how do you define that? Since there have been no real definition of this warning in over 2 years closing as invalid.
[Bug target/47842] gcc forces 16-byte stack alignment on Solaris i386, when SYSV requires word alignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47842 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Yuri from comment #3) The problem is that gcc assumes that stack is 16 aligned and creates code based on this. For example it places instruction like this 'movdqa %xmm0, 0x10(%esp)' which assumes 16 byte alignment. As a result, gcc compiled procedure crashes when called by ABI compliant code. We need a testcase and one has not been forth coming in the last 2 years so closing as invalid.
[Bug c++/47929] unclear prototype for '...' does not match any in class diagnostic for templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47929 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-10 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
[Bug c++/47960] dlopen call during DSO initialization breaks C++ RTTI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed so closing as such.
[Bug middle-end/48099] Evaluation order of arguments in a call expression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48099 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- What front-end requires flag_evaluation_order now?
[Bug target/47779] Problem cross-compiling trunk for bfin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target||bfin-uclinux Severity|major |normal
[Bug bootstrap/48474] gcc fails to bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48474 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also don't patches goto gcc-patches@ .
[Bug middle-end/48782] unused-but-set static variables are not optimized out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48782 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-10 Component|c |middle-end Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
[Bug target/47930] -marm is undocumented; driver accepts -mno-thumb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47930 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed.
[Bug target/49046] code fragment with inline assembly seg faults gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49046 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Invalid as this is a bug in the assembler and not GCC.
[Bug rtl-optimization/49034] ARM optimizer generating incorrect code (causing bad pointer dereference)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49034 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- No testcase forth coming in the last 2 years so closing.
[Bug middle-end/49207] Instruction scheduling error in GCC mips cross-compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49207 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c |middle-end Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to hanib from comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) I think you have an aliasing problem in your code. The code I am compiling is the Perlbench benchmark from SPEC-CPU2006. If I compile the code for an Intel machine using -O2 there is no problem. This problem only appears when I use the GCC MIPS cross-compiler with the -O2 switch. I also traced through the code and the sequence of these two instructions should be reversed. Perl in SPEC CPU 2006 has known aliasing bugs in it; just use -fno-strict-aliasing.
[Bug target/47739] gcc 4.4.5 with target powerpc-wrs-vxworks fails to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47739 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target||*-vxworks --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- /* Both kernels and RTPs have the facilities required by this macro. */ #define TARGET_POSIX_IO That is the comment from vxworks.h. I bet this is due to vxworks support not being maintained at all.
[Bug target/49376] ICE when compiling linux kernel on mipsel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49376 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2013-11-10 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does this work in a latter version of the compiler?
[Bug driver/49370] flags implemented in the specs file but undocumented
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49370 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-11-10 Component|other |driver Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
[Bug libmudflap/49449] -fmudflapth -lmudflapth problems with -fvisibility=hidden, missing posix_memalign wrapper and pointers in varargs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/24830] Duplicate constructors with -fmudflap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24830 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/27526] mudflap mishandles mmap when compiled -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27526 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/29691] libmudflap misses buffer overrun in sprintf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29691 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/28536] Reading or assigning global h_errno variable causes a memory violation report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28536 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/24839] Mudflap not registering unreferenced globals
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24839 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/28188] dynamic linkage error for shared libraries compiled and linked against libmudflapth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28188 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/41559] fgetc_unlocked fails with -fmudflap -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41559 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug c/30592] -fmudflap and -Wnested-externs conflict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30592 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/38766] mudflap cannot detect errors on stack of nptl thread
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38766 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/43063] libmudflap: errors when accessing struct lconv members
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43063 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/18885] linker does not link libmudflap automatically with -fmudflap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18885 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/48485] mudflap don't discover mistake - negative one index on static array i.e. a[-1]=b;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48485 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug c/42885] -fmudflap prevents 'conflicting types' warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42885 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug middle-end/51764] mudflap does not work with LTO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/33591] mudflap gives warnings exceeding bounds on valid code, when using readdir(2) on large directories
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33591 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/24420] mudflap doesnt work with DSOs?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24420 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/56105] [static const array + array on stack] - Mudflap false violation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56105 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/56390] [setjmp/longjmp] Mudflap false violation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56390 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/44661] Link order (?) might cause threaded libmudflap to assert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44661 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/37927] Mudflap : invalid reads when accessing static objects in shared libraries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37927 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/41253] mudflap complains about c++ temporary passed in to global ctor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41253 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/31845] Need to adjust libmudflap timeout values in testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31845 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
[Bug libmudflap/27348] mudflap produces a bogus error with memcmp that goes over the size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27348 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- fmudflap support has been removed.
