[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka  ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Sep 11 06:46:23 2014
New Revision: 215149

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

PR tree-optimization/63186
* ipa-split.c (test_nonssa_use): Skip nonforced labels.
(mark_nonssa_use): Likewise.
(verify_non_ssa_vars): Verify all header blocks for label
definitions.

* gcc.dg/pr63186.c: New testcase.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63186.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ipa-split.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


[Bug tree-optimization/62631] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs

2014-09-10 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631

amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> The new gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c test FAILs on 64-bit SPARC (only;
> 32-bit is
> ok):
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI" 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "p_[0-9]* <"
> 1
> 
> I'm attaching the ivopts dump.
> 
>   Rainer

Hi,
According to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00345.html, could
you have a look whether the huge cost returned on sparc64 is as expected?

Thanks very much.


[Bug middle-end/61848] [5 Regression] a previous declaration causes the section attribute to be lost

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
   ||m

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 63221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug middle-end/63221] symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski  ---
.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 61848 ***


[Bug middle-end/63221] symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Dup of bug 61848.


[Bug middle-end/63221] New: symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221

Bug ID: 63221
   Summary: symbol with section attribute ends up in common
   Product: gcc
   Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: middle-end
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com

extern int sharedTop;
int sharedTop __attribute__ ((section (".cvmx_shared"))); 

sharedTop ends up in COM with trunk, GCC 4.8 puts it in .cvmx_shared as one
would expect.


[Bug middle-end/63220] New: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline

2014-09-10 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63220

Bug ID: 63220
   Summary: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline
   Product: gcc
   Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: middle-end
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: xinliangli at gmail dot com

Created attachment 33466
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33466&action=edit
test case

Compile the attached source with -std=gnu++11 -O1 option, the compilation will
fail with the error message

 error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 


There is no problem with O2.


[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212

--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo  ---
Created attachment 33465
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33465&action=edit
problematic libgcc divsc3 function


[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212

Oleg Endo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2014-09-10
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo  ---
I've committed a small change as r215140.  In my case building libgcc failed in
the function __divsc3 and the change in sh_secondary_reload made it go away. 
I've briefly compared the resulting code against non-LRA and it looked OK. 
However, building __divsc3 still fails for -m2 -mb, now with the following:

beh 0 0 0
(insn 1159 1008 1120 27 (set (reg:QI 625)
(mem/c:QI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 153 sfp)
(const_int 19 [0x13])) [2 %sfp+-1 S1 A8])) sh_tmp.cpp:45 -1
 (nil))

sh_tmp.cpp: In function '__divsc3':
sh_tmp.cpp:57:1: internal compiler error: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at
lra.c:947
 }
 ^
0x8524c29 lra_set_insn_recog_data(rtx_def*)
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:947
0x85258cb lra_get_insn_recog_data
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra-int.h:468
0x85258cb lra_update_insn_regno_info
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1607
0x85258cb lra_update_insn_regno_info
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1598
0x8525b1b lra_push_insn_1
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1660
0x8525b1b lra_push_insn(rtx_def*)
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1668
0x8525d12 push_insns
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1711
0x852618f lra_process_new_insns(rtx_def*, rtx_def*, rtx_def*, char const*)
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:1756
0x8533758 simplify_operand_subreg
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra-constraints.c:1523
0x8533758 curr_insn_transform
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3258
0x8535e2d lra_constraints(bool)
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4212
0x8526af8 lra(_IO_FILE*)
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/lra.c:2198
0x84e6823 do_reload
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/ira.c:5306
0x84e6823 execute
../../gcc-sh-lra/gcc/ira.c:5465

The generated insn 1159 isn't recognized, because the displacement value is out
of range.

It seems that LRA doesn't try to transform the out of range displacement QImode
move into something else so that the  constraint is satisfied.

Maybe this is due to the way I did the QI/HImode displacement patterns.  AFAIR,
reload uses the macro LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS (sh_legitimize_reload_address)
to handle such cases.  LRA can decompose addresses.  However, it looks like
it's not done in some cases?


[Bug lto/63215] LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted from object files

2014-09-10 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215

--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka  ---
> Hmm, we can easily distinguish them by seeing whether a definition is
> available.

Well, what happens in this testcase is that we see ABS at LTO time, we promote
it to static (because no one uses it outside) and we optimize out.  Later in
queue we pattern match ABS and we are screwed.  To fix this, we need to keep
builtin function definitions around specially and see after all the function
bodies are produces what builtin functions are used.

This is just part of problem. Consider case where ABS is provided by LTO
compiled
static library. Because the use of ABS appears at link time, the linker will
not see
any use of ABS and willnot bring it in.  Later we synthetize it and we are
screwed.

For this we need linker plugin to know what functions we can possibly
syntehtize in the backend and pretend them to be used by every LTO body. This
however may be quite bad thing, since we can synthetize quite fancy things like
STDIO functions.  So ful handling of those seems bit difficult to me.

I think it may need iteration - i.e. if linker discovers that use of function
provided by LTO symbol tables was introduced during linktime it will repreat
the
whole circus to get object file implementing that function...

Honza


[Bug libstdc++/63219] New: Superfluous template parameter in match_result::format overload

2014-09-10 Thread ofv at wanadoo dot es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219

Bug ID: 63219
   Summary: Superfluous template parameter in match_result::format
overload
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: libstdc++
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: ofv at wanadoo dot es

This method:

  template
basic_string
format(const basic_string& __fmt,
   match_flag_type __flags = regex_constants::format_default) const
{
  basic_string __result;
  format(std::back_inserter(__result), __fmt, __flags);
  return __result;
}

in std::match_results contains "typename _Out_iter", which seems a copy&pasto.
Trying to use this method results on a compile error.


[Bug target/63209] [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated

2014-09-10 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63209

davidxl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from davidxl  ---
Fixed in trunk: r215136, in gcc-4_9: r215137

2014-09-10  Xinliang David Li  

PR target/63209
* config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Handle case where source
and target operands are the same.


[Bug libstdc++/63218] New: More compact std::bitset for small n

2014-09-10 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218

Bug ID: 63218
   Summary: More compact std::bitset for small n
   Product: gcc
   Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: ABI
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P3
 Component: libstdc++
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

sizeof(std::bitset<1>) is 8 on x86_64. It would be nice if it was reduced a
bit. For efficiency reasons, it makes sense to keep std::bitset<65> of size 16,
but for anything using at most 32 bits, using a smaller underlying type would
be better.

I had already though about that a long time ago, and was reminded by reading:

https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msg/std-proposals/UjNcLLrGwv8/Pe1Icl6h6xQJ

(another ABI-breaking change in bitset would be to set _WordT to unsigned long
long on win64)


[Bug c++/63217] New: template conversion operator returning const reference not used for conversion in some cases

2014-09-10 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217

Bug ID: 63217
   Summary: template conversion operator returning const reference
not used for conversion in some cases
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: rs2740 at gmail dot com

Minimized repro:

struct foo {
template
operator const T & () { static T t {}; return t;}
};

int main() {
int t((foo()));
}

g++ complains:

prog.cc: In function 'int main()':
prog.cc:7:18: error: cannot convert 'foo' to 'int' in initialization
 int t((foo()));
  ^

This behavior is consistently reproducible in all versions of g++ I tested.
Both Clang and MSVC 2013 compiles this code without errors.

The template `operator const T&` should have been instantiated with `T = int`
and used for the conversion. Using a non-template `operator const int &`
instead of a template makes the code compile.


[Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill  ---
So, intentional.  And the test added for 62302 covers this as well.


[Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306

--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill  ---
I'm not too concerned about the change.(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment
#9)
> 4.5+4.6+4.9 is more released compilers than 4.7/4.8 though, and 4.9 is
> already widely deployed too, IMHO it is worse to change this again
> mid-release.

Fair enough.  I'm not too concerned about the mismatch either way; even in
4.7/4.8 any TU that emits D1/2 also emits D0, so we aren't going to have link
failures.


[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659

--- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill  ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 10 17:28:59 2014
New Revision: 215134

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61659
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Don't set DECL_COMDAT on static inlines.
(duplicate_decls, start_decl): Likewise.
* pt.c (check_explicit_specialization): Likewise.
(push_template_decl_real): Or static templates.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/no-weak1.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c


[Bug c++/61489] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.

2014-09-10 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489

Paolo Carlini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |paolo.carlini at oracle 
dot com

--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini  ---
Mine.


[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659

Markus Trippelsdorf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #35 from Markus Trippelsdorf  ---
Fixed.


[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659

--- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill  ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 10 14:27:40 2014
New Revision: 215131

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/53808
PR c++/61659
* decl2.c (note_comdat_fn): New.
(set_comdat): New.
(cp_write_global_declarations): Call set_comdat.
* method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Call note_comdat_fn.
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [FUNCTION_DECL]: Likewise.
* decl2.c (mark_needed): Mark clones.
(import_export_decl): Not here.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/no-weak1.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/spec1.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/devirt5.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/friend56.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec38.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/decl2.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/method.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/devirt4.C


[Bug lto/53808] Undefined symbol when building a library with lto

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808

--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill  ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 10 14:27:40 2014
New Revision: 215131

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/53808
PR c++/61659
* decl2.c (note_comdat_fn): New.
(set_comdat): New.
(cp_write_global_declarations): Call set_comdat.
* method.c (implicitly_declare_fn): Call note_comdat_fn.
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [FUNCTION_DECL]: Likewise.
* decl2.c (mark_needed): Mark clones.
(import_export_decl): Not here.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/no-weak1.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/spec1.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/devirt5.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/friend56.C
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec38.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/decl2.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/method.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/devirt4.C


[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

2014-09-10 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654

--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor  ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Sep 10 11:34:09 2014
New Revision: 215122

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-10  Martin Jambor  

PR ipa/61654
* cgraphclones.c (duplicate_thunk_for_node): Copy arguments of the
new decl properly.  Analyze the new thunk if it is expanded.

gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/ipa/pr61654.C: New test.


Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr61654.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cgraphclones.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


[Bug c++/63194] [5 Regression] ICE in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552

2014-09-10 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194

Markus Trippelsdorf  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf  ---
Actually started with r209907 aka DR 1351.


[Bug c++/63216] gcc crash: Segmentation fault

2014-09-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
GCC 4.7 is no longer maintained or supported, please try a later release.


[Bug c++/63216] New: gcc crash: Segmentation fault

2014-09-10 Thread winbill at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216

Bug ID: 63216
   Summary: gcc crash: Segmentation fault
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: c++
  Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
  Reporter: winbill at hotmail dot com

=== gcc version:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.7.2-5'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext
--enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.7
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic
--enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5) 

=== output message:
g++ -g -Wall -O2 -pipe -fno-ident -shared -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRNT -fPIC
-Wno-strict-aliasing -I../../../comm//include
-I/usr/local/services/XY/qg/trunk/xy_interface/include 
-I../../../comm//ol_include/comm -I../../../comm//ol_include/server -I.
-I../../../comm//ft_api -I/usr/local/include/libxml2
-I/usr/local/openssl/include -c -o scene_room.o scene_room.cpp
scene_room.cpp: In member function ‘int CGameRoom::LeaveRoom(long long unsigned
int, uint16_t, unsigned int, const char*, Json::Value)’:
scene_room.cpp:615:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See  for instructions.
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/cciJERN8.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.

[Bug rtl-optimization/25285] pessimization of goto * ("computed goto")

2014-09-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener  ---
Please open new bugs.


[Bug rtl-optimization/25285] pessimization of goto * ("computed goto")

2014-09-10 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285

mrs at gcc dot gnu.org  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed||2014-09-10
 CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|INVALID |---
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
Customer unhappy.


[Bug middle-end/61225] [5 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-09-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225

--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> Yes. I see. The patch is in review. But no feedback although I had pinged it 
> for
> three times.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01325.html
>
> I will go on ping it.

The patch no longer apply on trunk (5.0).


[Bug lto/63215] LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted from object files

2014-09-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener  ---
Hmm, we can easily distinguish them by seeing whether a definition is
available.

That is, symbols with a definition should _always_ be output?  I don't see
any difficulties with builtin handling in general (though we probably should
stop streaming builtins specially so we retain as builtin what was a builtin
during compile-time).  tree merging should happily merge equal builtin
decls (and we compare them by function code anyway).