Re: 64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0

2009-05-21 Thread Aharon Robbins
There's nothing like deterministic software.

I started over again in a completely new build directory and the regular

../gcc-4.4.0/configure --prefix=/usr/gcc4
make

is through the 3 stage bootstrap and is now compiling fortran and java.

But I *know* I tried this out of the box before and it didn't work.

I didn't start over again with fresh extraction of the tar balls, but
that shouldn't make any difference, right?

Once this build finishes I will try a fresh extraction and will report
back to the mailing list.

Jerry, thanks for the offer to look at logs - I'll hold off on that until
I can reproduce a problem.

Thanks,

Arnold

> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:44:55 -0700
> From: Jerry DeLisle 
> To: Aharon Robbins 
> Subject: Re: 64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0
>
> Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > Jerry,
> > 
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > 
> > Do you have the stuff necessary for doing 32-bit builds installed also? I 
> > do,
> > and it feels like that might be the issue.
> > 
> > I can send you logs if you really want to see the gory details.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Arnold
> > 
> >> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:05:29 -0700
> >> From: Jerry DeLisle 
> >> To: Aharon Robbins 
> >> Cc: bug-...@gnu.org
> >> Subject: Re: 64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0
> >>
> >> Aharon Robbins wrote:
> >>> Hi. After several tries and a modicum of googling, I found that
> >>>
> >>>   CFLAGS=-m64 ../gcc-4.4.0/configure --disable-multilib
> >>>
> >>> was the magic incantation to get gcc to get into the second stage of
> >>> the boostrap.  This is on a Fedora Core 10 system.
> >>>
> >>> This seems to be an old issue; google turns things up dating back to
> >>> 2003.  I suspect that x86_64 systems are only going to be more popular
> >>> with time; the build process on those systems needs to be as easy as
> >>> for 32 bit systems.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Arnold Robbins
> >>> (the gawk guy :-)
> >>>
> >> Aharon,
> >>
> >> I have been building gcc for several years now with no issues on x86-64 
> >> and on 
> >> Fedora Core 10 ever since it was released.  What exactly has been your 
> >> problem?
> >>
> >> Its been as easy as 123.  I have never had to set CCFLAGS or 
> >> disable-multilib.
> >>
> >> Jerry
> > 
> You are welcome to send logs.  Or least the portion where you see errors.
>
> Jerry
>


Re: 64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0

2009-05-20 Thread Aharon Robbins
Jerry,

Thanks for the reply.

Do you have the stuff necessary for doing 32-bit builds installed also? I do,
and it feels like that might be the issue.

I can send you logs if you really want to see the gory details.

Thanks,

Arnold

> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:05:29 -0700
> From: Jerry DeLisle 
> To: Aharon Robbins 
> Cc: bug-...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0
>
> Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > Hi. After several tries and a modicum of googling, I found that
> > 
> > CFLAGS=-m64 ../gcc-4.4.0/configure --disable-multilib
> > 
> > was the magic incantation to get gcc to get into the second stage of
> > the boostrap.  This is on a Fedora Core 10 system.
> > 
> > This seems to be an old issue; google turns things up dating back to
> > 2003.  I suspect that x86_64 systems are only going to be more popular
> > with time; the build process on those systems needs to be as easy as
> > for 32 bit systems.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Arnold Robbins
> > (the gawk guy :-)
> > 
> Aharon,
>
> I have been building gcc for several years now with no issues on x86-64 and 
> on 
> Fedora Core 10 ever since it was released.  What exactly has been your 
> problem?
>
> Its been as easy as 123.  I have never had to set CCFLAGS or disable-multilib.
>
> Jerry


64 bit linux build problem for gcc 4.4.0

2009-05-19 Thread Aharon Robbins
Hi. After several tries and a modicum of googling, I found that

CFLAGS=-m64 ../gcc-4.4.0/configure --disable-multilib

was the magic incantation to get gcc to get into the second stage of
the boostrap.  This is on a Fedora Core 10 system.

This seems to be an old issue; google turns things up dating back to
2003.  I suspect that x86_64 systems are only going to be more popular
with time; the build process on those systems needs to be as easy as
for 32 bit systems.

Thanks,

Arnold Robbins
(the gawk guy :-)