[Bug other/70426] New: decl_expr contains too little information
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70426
Bug ID: 70426
Summary: decl_expr contains too little information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
using gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2
In the 001t.tu file, the decl_expr contains no real information.
here is the context of relevant statements :
@9529 function_declname: @9547type: @5191scpe: @155
srcp: eval.c:199 chain: @9548
link: static body: @9549
@9549 bind_exprtype: @129 vars: @9568body: @9569
@9569 statement_list 0 : @95871 : @95882 : @9589
3 : @95904 : @95915 : @9592
6 : @9593
@9585 identifier_node strg: pwd lngt: 3
@9568 var_decl name: @9585type: @144 scpe: @9529
srcp: eval.c:201 chain: @9586
size: @22 algn: 64 used: 1
@9587 decl_exprtype: @129
@9588 decl_exprtype: @129
@9589 modify_expr type: @144 op 0: @9586op 1: @9615
@129void_typename: @126 algn: 8
@126type_declname: @128 type: @129 chain: @130
@128identifier_node strg: void lngt: 4
The source code around 199 is :
198 static void
199 send_pwd_to_eterm ()
200 {
201 char *pwd, *f;
202
203 f = 0;
204 pwd = get_string_value ("PWD");
205 if (pwd == 0)
206 f = pwd = get_working_directory ("eterm");
207 fprintf (stderr, "\032/%s\n", pwd);
208 free (f);
209 }
So can I infer that @9587 refers to line 201 for the pwd variable?
See https://archive.org/details/bash.compilation for a full snapshot of the
compile. build/eval.c.001t.tu is the file.
So please tell me if this is correct or are we missing important fields in the
decl_expr.
[Bug other/70425] New: decl_expr contains too little information
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70425
Bug ID: 70425
Summary: decl_expr contains too little information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
using gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2
In the 001t.tu file, the decl_expr contains no real information.
here is the context of relevant statements :
@9529 function_declname: @9547type: @5191scpe: @155
srcp: eval.c:199 chain: @9548
link: static body: @9549
@9549 bind_exprtype: @129 vars: @9568body: @9569
@9569 statement_list 0 : @95871 : @95882 : @9589
3 : @95904 : @95915 : @9592
6 : @9593
@9585 identifier_node strg: pwd lngt: 3
@9568 var_decl name: @9585type: @144 scpe: @9529
srcp: eval.c:201 chain: @9586
size: @22 algn: 64 used: 1
@9587 decl_exprtype: @129
@9588 decl_exprtype: @129
@9589 modify_expr type: @144 op 0: @9586op 1: @9615
@129void_typename: @126 algn: 8
@126type_declname: @128 type: @129 chain: @130
@128identifier_node strg: void lngt: 4
The source code around 199 is :
198 static void
199 send_pwd_to_eterm ()
200 {
201 char *pwd, *f;
202
203 f = 0;
204 pwd = get_string_value ("PWD");
205 if (pwd == 0)
206 f = pwd = get_working_directory ("eterm");
207 fprintf (stderr, "\032/%s\n", pwd);
208 free (f);
209 }
So can I infer that @9587 refers to line 201 for the pwd variable?
See https://archive.org/details/bash.compilation for a full snapshot of the
compile. build/eval.c.001t.tu is the file.
So please tell me if this is correct or are we missing important fields in the
decl_expr.
[Bug c++/67155] New: Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 Bug ID: 67155 Summary: Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36148 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36148action=edit test case I encountered a strange behavior when creating a class that wraps a constexpr string. It seems that the static constant string field wrapped in a class is only accessible in the same header file and not available in a separate compilation unit. The workaround is to move the usage of the static fields into the header. If you prefer git you can find the test case here as well : https://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/gcc-plugin-cpp-template/tree/constexpr/testcase
[Bug c++/67155] Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 --- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- The compiler output : g++ -std=gnu++11 test.cpp test.hpp /tmp/cceBFmJM.o: In function `S::S()': test.cpp:(.text+0x35): undefined reference to `S::u' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:2: recipe for target 'test' failed make: *** [test] Error 1
[Bug c++/67155] Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- adding this seems to solve the linker error: constexpr CU S::u;
[Bug c++/67155] Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- got feedback on so http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31889247/c-static-constexpr-class-member-with-complex-class-linking-issues/31889510#31889510
[Bug c++/66506] New: Crash on compiling llvm plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66506
Bug ID: 66506
Summary: Crash on compiling llvm plugin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When developing/compiling a llvm clang 3.7 plugin with gcc 4.9 on debian
unstable I encounted a crash. I thought to report this because maybe it would
be useful.
My internal bug report is here:
https://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/traces/issues/2
Here is the backtrace:
In file included from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/Attr.h:150:0,
from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:20,
from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/DeclVisitor.h:17,
from trace_instrumentor.cpp:26:
/usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/Attrs.inc:4263:7: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
class ObjCExceptionAttr : public InheritableAttr {
^
[Bug c++/66507] Crash on compiling llvm plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66507 James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- Not reproducable. Will close for now. I have seen this sporadic compiler crash before.
[Bug c++/66507] New: Crash on compiling llvm plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66507
Bug ID: 66507
Summary: Crash on compiling llvm plugin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When developing/compiling a llvm clang 3.7 plugin with gcc 4.9 on debian
unstable I encounted a crash. I thought to report this because maybe it would
be useful.
this error did not recoccur when trying to compiling again.
My internal bug report is here:
https://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/traces/issues/2
Here is the backtrace:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-I ../include -I/usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include -DNDEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -g -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -std=c++11 -g -O2 -MT trace_instrumentor.lo -MD
-MP -MF .deps/trace_instrumentor.Tpo -c -o trace_instrumentor.lo
trace_instrumentor.cpp
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I ../include
-I/usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include -DNDEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC
-std=c++11 -g -O2 -MT trace_instrumentor.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/trace_instrumentor.Tpo -c trace_instrumentor.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/trace_instrumentor.o
In file included from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/Attr.h:150:0,
from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:20,
from /usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/DeclVisitor.h:17,
from trace_instrumentor.cpp:26:
/usr/lib/llvm-3.7/include/clang/AST/Attrs.inc:4263:7: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
class ObjCExceptionAttr : public InheritableAttr {
^
[Bug c++/65638] New: Crash on invalid input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65638 Bug ID: 65638 Summary: Crash on invalid input Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com using the invalid input file: ``` void crash (bool ``` found using permutation testing based on the https://h4ck3rm1k3.wordpress.com/2015/03/31/test-random-permutations-of-files-and-lines-for-gccgo-golang-go-compiler-bug-reporting/ Arch: Linux gcc2-power8.osuosl.org 3.17.4-301.fc21.ppc64le #1 SMP Mon Dec 1 07:51:01 UTC 2014 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux crashes on : gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1) and gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150331 (experimental) but not on : Linux 3.10-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.3-1 (2013-07-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux with g++-4.9 (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 ``` test.cc:1:14: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ at end of input void crash ( bool ^ test.cc:1:14: error: expected ‘)’ at end of input test.cc:1:14: error: expected initializer at end of input ```
[Bug c++/65638] Crash on invalid input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65638 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- No options at all. On the gcc compile farm : gcc112.fsffrance.org [h4ck3rm1k3@gcc2-power8 ~]$ which g++ /usr/bin/g++ [h4ck3rm1k3@gcc2-power8 ~]$ g++ test1.cc test1.cc:1:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault void crash ( bool ^ Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for instructions.
[Bug c++/65638] Crash on invalid input
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65638 --- Comment #3 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- This test case can be reduced to just a file with the word bool in it. ``` bool ```
[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #3 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- (In reply to James Michael DuPont from comment #2) also on github https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10047 this was closed on github because it is valid go.
[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- @iant thanks for the update. my bad, I got confused. here is the commit. https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cc0446bae7c8c0ccead885787ad3fc4db0c127e0
[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- output is : test.go:6:8: error: expected type
[Bug go/65272] New: switch on type of interface failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272
Bug ID: 65272
Summary: switch on type of interface failing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
package test;
func clr(q interface{}) {
switch x := q.(type) {
case *x:
return
}
occurs in : https://github.com/cznic/ql/blob/master/btree.go
[Bug go/65272] switch on type of interface failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65272 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- also on github https://github.com/golang/go/issues/10047
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #10 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- I have reported the problem in the code to boost, they have fixed it. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8651#comment:1 The problem is having to do with underspecifed namespace selection. They changed the code to remove the crash. mike
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
Here is a small change to work around the crash :
namespace boost {
namespace detail { namespace variant {
struct variant_hasher: public //boost::
static_visitorstd::size_t {
template class T
std::size_t operator()(T const val) const {
//using namespace boost;
hashT hasher;
return hasher(val);
}
};
}}
}
It is the uneeded namespace usage that causes the problem.
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #4 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- Created attachment 30259 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30259action=edit test case this is the minimal test case that I have. by applying the small namespace changes to the end it will go away.
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- Sorry, It seems that the original attachment was not applied, I have bzip2ed it so now it fits. thanks mike
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #6 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- I have filed a small cosmetic bug in boost about this change to the namespace usage : https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8651
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 --- Comment #8 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com --- Tested like this: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/cc1plus -std=gnu++11 -fdump-translation-unit testvariant_min.ii
[Bug c++/57524] New: internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 Bug ID: 57524 Summary: internal compiler error on dump translation unit Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com using the debian sid standard : GNU C++ (Debian 4.7.2-5) version 4.7.2 (x86_64-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2, GMP version 5.0.5, MPFR version 3.1.0-p10, MPC version 0.9 warning: MPFR header version 3.1.0-p10 differs from library version 3.1.1-p2. GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 Compiling boost spirit.qi code, Here is the one that creates the error. Invocation is : /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/cc1plus -std=gnu++11 -fdump-translation-unit treedumpparse.ii the output is: (this is the last of the function print ) std::size_t boost::detail::variant::variant_hasher::operator()(const T) const the error is : In file included from /usr/include/boost/variant/variant.hpp:35:0, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/support/info.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/domain.hpp:16, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/meta_compiler.hpp:15, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/action/action.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi/action.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/home/qi.hpp:14, from /usr/include/boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp:16, from treedumpparse.cpp:6: /usr/include/boost/variant/detail/hash_variant.hpp:32:33: internal compiler error: in timevar_start, at timevar.c:344 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs for instructions. This can be reproduced with this one include : #include /usr/include/boost/variant/detail/hash_variant.hpp I am trying to reduce the problem, but it is difficult.
[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
I tried to reduce the input size but it is not producing any results.
namespace std {
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
};
namespace boost {
namespace detail {
struct is_static_visitor_tag { };
typedef void static_visitor_default_return;
}
template typename R = ::boost::detail::static_visitor_default_return
class static_visitor: public detail::is_static_visitor_tag {
public:
typedef R result_type;
protected:
static_visitor() { }~static_visitor() { }
};}
namespace boost
{
template class T struct hash;
template class T void hash_combine(std::size_t seed, T const v);
template class It std::size_t hash_range(It, It);
template class It void hash_range(std::size_t, It, It);
}
namespace boost {
namespace detail { namespace variant {
struct variant_hasher: public boost::static_visitorstd::size_t {
template class T
std::size_t operator()(T const val) const {
using namespace boost;
hashT hasher;
return hasher(val);
} };} }}
[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2011-05-16 19:17:06 UTC --- Ok, I will have to look into it, thanks, mike On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2011.05.16 11:00:14 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-16 11:00:14 UTC --- please try to reproduce this with a current FSF release or report it to Ubuntu for C++0x bugs please try 4.5 or later, lots of initializer list bugs have been fixed already -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug.
[Bug c++/45938] New: tree tag for CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION spec is confusing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45938 Summary: tree tag for CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION spec is confusing. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com In the file : gcc/cp/dump.c there is a dump of the CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION, if (CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION(t)) dump_string(di, spec); This is confusing, because spec already has a different meaning, it is used to denote other values, spec : NAME. It would be better to rename this output to dump_string(di, tmpl_spclz); for example so that the tag spec is consistent. thanks, mike
[Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Summary: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com Created attachment 21928 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21928 Compile Log I have been experimenting with c++ initializer lists and refactoring binutils to use c++. While doing so, the compiler crashed. I am reporting this in case it might help the development of the compiler. Compiler is : g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9) 4.4.1 lsb version : 9.10 karmic with lots of backports and patches
[Bug c++/45855] New: switched ; and : causes compile crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45855
Summary: switched ; and : causes compile crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
Created attachment 21931
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21931
Preprocessed .ii file
g++ -save-temps -std=c++0x -I. -I../../include ../../opcodes/i386-dis.h
../../opcodes/i386-dis.h:1706: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Line is:
const dis386 test2(addB, {Eb, Gb}):
[Bug c++/45855] switched ; and : causes compile crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45855 --- Comment #2 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-10-01 08:11:48 UTC --- The bug also occurs with ;. it seems to be a different problem.
[Bug c++/45855] switched ; and : causes compile crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45855 --- Comment #4 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-10-01 08:34:13 UTC --- In the newest git head version, I get a better error report : g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20100929 (experimental) ./gcc/build/gcc/cc1plus -quiet -std=c++0x i386-dis-21931.ii ../../opcodes/i386-dis.h:1706:37: error: expected ',' or ';' before ':' token and when I replace the semicolon, it works.
[Bug c++/42814] New: gcc segfaults on gch
/usr/local/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DMAPNIK_DEBUGinclude -ggdb -O1 -DDEBUG -pg -DMAPNIK_DEBUG -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik/agg/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I../include -save-temps -MT libmapnik_la-filter_factory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libmapnik_la-filter_factory.Tpo -c src/filter_factory.ii g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. -- Summary: gcc segfaults on gch Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #3 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:17 --- Created an attachment (id=19667) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19667action=view) precompiled headers /usr/local/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DMAPNIK_DEBUGinclude -ggdb -O1 -DDEBUG -pg -DMAPNIK_DEBUG -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik/agg/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I../include -save-temps -MT libmapnik_la-filter_factory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libmapnik_la-filter_factory.Tpo -c src/filter_factory.ii g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #4 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:27 --- Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 326 bytes, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0) To g...@github.com:h4ck3rm1k3/MapNickAutotools.git 1ae752a..6803b1b master - master -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #5 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:41 --- Sorry that is not the precompiled header, but the preprocessed, all you need to get the crash i hope. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #8 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 20:05 --- got it again after make clean, maybe it ran out of memory: mdup...@introspector-desktop:/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik$ gunzip src/filter_factory.ii.gz mdup...@introspector-desktop:/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik$ /usr/local/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DMAPNIK_DEBUGinclude -ggdb -O1 -DDEBUG -pg -DMAPNIK_DEBUG -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik/agg/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I../include -save-temps -MT libmapnik_la-filter_factory.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libmapnik_la-filter_factory.Tpo -c src/filter_factory.ii g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #9 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 20:09 --- Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on gch /usr/local/bin/c++ --version c++ (GCC) 4.5.0 20100113 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:01 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:01 --- Which GCC version are you using? The preprocessed source does not use a precompiled header. Compiling the file works ok for me with GCC 4.4. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added GCC target triplet| |i?86-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42814] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #11 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 20:54 --- Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on gch so I am thinking about a way to wrap the existing templates that I use. there must be a way to reduce the size of the gch by specifing a list of classes we use. that would reduce the build size. this boost lib takes forever to process. We only use %1 of it at a time. There has got to be a way to precompile all these templates. A nice fine grained, for each header, external pch database for stl and boost would make working with them fun again. I have been experimenting with grouping the headers into groups of common dependencies. Basically I made a type level dependency tree that is sliced up into pools of common types and topologically sorted so that we can compile the the gch files in the right order and include the previous gch. I would consider putting some time into helping make the gch better if you give me direction. mike On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:47 --- With unoptimized trunk I see us blowing the stack during garbage-collecting. Note that we have a load of templates in this testcase and we walk them in unfortunate order. (gdb) #79368 0x0835b9fb in ggc_collect () at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/ggc-page.c:1962 1962 ggc_mark_roots (); ugh. We reach stuff from the function decl type. 400 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.type.size_unit); (gdb) #79358 0x0828fdc9 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xb772f378) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:163 163 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.int_cst.common.type); (gdb) #79357 0x0829106b in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xb7743000) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:398 398 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.type.values); hmm ... #79349 0x0829115c in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xa83ff180) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:417 417 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.type.name); (gdb) #79348 0x08290cb9 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xa8400138) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:355 355 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.type_decl.common.common.common.common.common.context); (gdb) #79347 0x0829106b in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xa83ff000) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:398 398 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.type.values); (gdb) #79346 0x08290229 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xa84003a8) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:228 228 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).generic.decl_non_common.common.common.common.common.common.type); (gdb) #79345 0x0829121c in gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node (x_p=0xa83ff420) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:425 425 gt_ggc_m_9lang_type ((*x).generic.type.lang_specific); (gdb) #79344 0x08292154 in gt_ggc_mx_lang_type (x_p=0xa83fdaa0) at ./gt-cp-tree.h:713 713 gt_ggc_m_9tree_node ((*x).u.c.template_info); hmm - we reach templates via integer constants ... -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-01-20 20:47:22 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
[Bug c++/42765] New: If the compile fails, the gch is still produced.
Even if the compile fails, the gch is produced! mdup...@introspector-desktop:~/2010/01/extern/mapnik/include/mapnik$ make datasource_cache.hpp.gch g++ -x c++-header -I ../.. -I .. -I -Winvalid-pch -pg \ -DMAPNIK_DEBUG \ -I/usr/include/libpng12 \ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H \ -I/home/mdupont/2010/01/mapnik/mapnik/agg/include \ -I/usr/local/include \ -I/usr/include/libxml2 \ -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/usr/include/libpng12 -c datasource_cache.hpp In file included from datasource_cache.hpp:31:0: ../mapnik/plugin.hpp:44:42: error: Plugin has not been declared make: *** [datasource_cache.hpp.gch] Error 1 mdup...@introspector-desktop:~/2010/01/extern/mapnik/include/mapnik$ make datasource_cache.hpp.gch make: `datasource_cache.hpp.gch' is up to date. -- Summary: If the compile fails, the gch is still produced. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42765
[Bug pch/40215] GCH generated with -save-temps does not store preprocessor state.
--- Comment #6 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-14 13:55 --- I am having this problem as well. Using the lastest version of g++. Test like this : If you include cassert in a pch, and then in the other file that uses the pch, the macro assert is no longer there. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40215
[Bug c++/42745] New: gcc segfaults on gch
The gch is segfaulting https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/506728 -- Summary: gcc segfaults on gch Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42745
[Bug c++/42745] gcc segfaults on gch
--- Comment #2 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-14 14:51 --- Using the preprocessed headers breaks the pch. I tried this with the latest 4 4 head I compiled myself, but now it does not break. I will continue testing with the latest version. thanks for you help. -- JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42745
