[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

[t.p.northover at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448

--- Comment #18 from Tim Northover t.p.northover at gmail dot com ---
 I am not aware of any shipping compiler that would actually try to preserve 
 dependencies, and nobody else mentioned any during the discussion of this 
 topic in ISO C++ SG1.

In case the data point is useful, Clang promotes consume to acquire at the
moment (though I wouldn't rule out bugs even in that choice).

[Bug target/56024] ARM NEON polynomial types behave as if signed

[t.p.northover at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56024

Tim Northover t.p.northover at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||t.p.northover at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Tim Northover t.p.northover at gmail dot com ---
Are there any plans to fix this soon? It's become relevant again on the Clang
mailing list. 

We don't want to switch to a sane type if GCC decides sanity is less important
than ABI-compatibility, but every so often it causes someone extra work to
handle the discrepancy.

[Bug target/56024] ARM NEON polynomial types behave as if signed

[t.p.northover at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56024

--- Comment #9 from Tim Northover t.p.northover at gmail dot com ---
Yay for infinite e-mail loops! Very sorry about that, it should be fixed now.