[Bug awt/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2005-08-24 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com 

--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com  2005-08-24 19:43 
---
*** Bug 22724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||from-classpath at savannah
   ||dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825

[Bug AWT/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2004-11-09 Thread sven at physto dot se 

--- Additional Comments From sven at physto dot se  2004-11-09 23:22 ---
This isn't a Awt or libgcj bug itself, but rather an effect of the extended-mode
of FPU being the default leading to inconsistent results with 64-bit doubles. 

A suggestion for a 'fix' is to set the FPU to 64-bit double rounding for Java
programs, since Java does not have a 'long double' type. This would both
stricter and give more consistent results with other platforms.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825

[Bug AWT/16825] Bad results for QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic

2004-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-09 
23:32 ---
Note the java standard does not require the FPU set to double-precision 
except when working in strict 
mode (this was changed after 1.0 IIRC).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16825