[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2015-12-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|NEW
 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
   Severity|normal  |minor

--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou  ---
Still fails on mainline.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2014-02-27 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

--- Comment #8 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr ---
Confirmed on 4.9-20140218.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2011-08-30 Thread nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nicolas.boulenguez at free
   ||dot fr

--- Comment #6 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr 2011-08-30 23:20:28 UTC 
---
confirmed on 4.6.1

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2011-08-30 Thread sam at rfc1149 dot net 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

--- Comment #7 from Samuel Tardieu sam at rfc1149 dot net 2011-08-30 23:21:41 
UTC ---
Je suis absent jusqu'au 5 septembre sans accès à mon courrier électronique.

I am on vacation until September 5 without email access.

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2009-08-06 Thread ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 


--- Comment #5 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org  2009-08-06 20:27 
---
Confirmed on 4.4.1.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-12-13 Thread sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-13 13:56 ---
Confirmed on gcc version 4.3.0 20071213


-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
   Last reconfirmed|2005-06-14 20:23:55 |2007-12-13 13:56:19
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-05-03 Thread ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 


--- Comment #3 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org  2007-05-03 19:15 
---
I disagree.  As highlighted at the beginning of this PR, per 8.2(2), the
instance becomes visibleonly _after_ its declaration, i.e. at the semicolon. 
Before the semicolon, the two Foos are NOT ambiguous because only the generic
is in scope, not the instance. Disambiguation is NOT necessary per the ARM, and
the error message does NOT comply with the ARM.


-- 

ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2007-05-02 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-02 16:13 ---
Error message looks right to me, the instantiation is not finished so you
cannot
use foo twice here without disambiguating it, e.g:

   procedure FOO is new Standard.foo;

Arno


-- 

charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606

[Bug ada/15606] Legal program rejected, RM 8.2(22)

2004-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-01 00:48 
---
Confirmed.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-01 00:48:04
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15606