[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:01 --- Tests removed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 09:00 --- Subject: Bug 19902 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-23 09:00:22 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Removed files: gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxa: cxa3004.a gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxb: cxb30061.am Log message: PR ada/19902 * ada/acats/tests/cxa/cxa3004.a: Remove. * ada/acats/tests/cxb/cxb30061.am: Likewise. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.5074&r2=1.5075 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxa/cxa3004.a.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/cxb/cxb30061.am.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=NONE -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-02-22 09:55 --- Subject: Re: ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression" > I was under the impression that moving it to the norun.lst was the canonical > procedure when waiting for an ACAA's response (did Laurent not do so once?). Not as far as I know. I'd say that norun.lst should be used for valid tests that are problematic. For other tests, it's simple enough to remove them, and add them back with changes when needed. That's a matter of taste of course, but I'd rather not overuse norun.lst Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 09:51 --- > Actually I do not see the interest, since the test is wrong. > I would simply cvs remove it. I was under the impression that moving it to the norun.lst was the canonical procedure when waiting for an ACAA's response (did Laurent not do so once?). That being said, I'll be happy to remove them if you prefer. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-02-22 09:46 --- Subject: Re: ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression" > Arno, any objection to moving them to norun.lst until after the issue is > resolved? Actually I do not see the interest, since the test is wrong. I would simply cvs remove it. Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 09:31 --- Arno, any objection to moving them to norun.lst until after the issue is resolved? -- What|Removed |Added CC||charlet at adacore dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-11 13:40:09 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902
[Bug ada/19902] ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression"
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-02-11 12:03 --- Subject: Re: New: ACATS cxa3004 cxb3006 fail at compile time "ambiguous expression" > Probably related to recent changes, might be an ACATS problem. Right, these tests should be removed from the repository, or modified. We've informed the ACAA about this issue (incompatibility with Ada 2005). Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19902