[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-21 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org  2005-02-21 17:53 
---
CC'ed. 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pluto at pld-linux dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089


[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-20 Thread mmazur at kernel dot pl

--- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl  2005-02-20 18:12 
---
I've recompiled the whole thing with -O0. Still doesn't work. If this is a 
miscompilation, then 
gcc4 is seriously borked on alpha. Any suggestions what to do with this? (I 
need gcc4 on 
alpha :) 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089


[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-19 
19:44 ---
hmm, RTH was able to build and report Ada results on alpha-linux-gnu:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00683.html

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089


[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread mmazur at kernel dot pl

--- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl  2005-02-19 20:10 
---
I've managed to google myself to PR18434 so looks like there is something wrong 
with 
alpha. 
 
Though I've seen stuff being broken depending on what languages are marked as 
supported (I've turned on only c++ and ada). 
 
Either way, I'll be building a whole distro (5 archs included) based on gcc4 
and I need this 
working, so even a workaround would help. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089


[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-19 Thread laurent at guerby dot net

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net  2005-02-19 20:32 
---
Yes this is probably a miscompilation of gnatmake, you may try to set boot flags
to -O0 or -O1 instead of -O2. No idea on why RTH doesn't see this.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089