[Bug ada/35645] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6120

2010-11-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35645

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
   ||gnu.org
Version|4.1.2   |4.6.0
 Resolution||FIXED
  Known to fail||

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-27 
19:20:38 UTC ---
Fixed on the mainline.


[Bug ada/35645] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6120

2008-05-14 Thread sam at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-14 09:20 ---
The code is not legal, adding keyword


-- 

sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35645



[Bug ada/35645] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:6120

2008-03-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-20 09:33 ---
This means there is an unhandled tree in gimplify_expr, which is in this case
probably PLACEHOLDER_EXPR(?):

pak1.t1ip (_init, x1)
{
  _init.x1 = (integer) x1;
  _init.x2 = PLACEHOLDER_EXPR struct pak1__t1.x1;
  goto D.509;
  D.509:;
  return _init;


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-03-20 09:33:00
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35645