[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou  ---
> Any chance of fixing that before gcc7?

Probably not, the underlying issue is in the SRA pass and not a regression.

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt  ---
Any chance of fixing that before gcc7?

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou  ---
The difference with other main 64-bit platforms (x86-64, SPARC64, Alpha) comes
from the BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT setting, which is only 64 on s390x instead of 128.

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |ebotcazou at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou  ---
Investigating.

[Bug ada/79441] [7 regression] gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79441

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-02-09
   Host|s390x   |
   Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails |[7 regression]
   |since r 236279  |gnat.dg/pack9.adb fails
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou  ---
Confirmed, only a missed optimization but needs to fixed at some point.