[Bug analyzer/99269] False positive -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak/-Wanalyzer-double-free with -fanalyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Fixed in GCC 11; test coverage added by above commit to GCC 12 onwards.
[Bug analyzer/99269] False positive -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak/-Wanalyzer-double-free with -fanalyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9603bccba62e250d0ff64863a1730a167d571a25 commit r12-5641-g9603bccba62e250d0ff64863a1730a167d571a25 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tue Nov 30 14:47:24 2021 -0500 analyzer: add regression test [PR99269] gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/99269 * gcc.dg/analyzer/pr99269.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm
[Bug analyzer/99269] False positive -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak/-Wanalyzer-double-free with -fanalyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2021-11-30 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this bug. I'm able to reproduce it with gcc 10.3: https://godbolt.org/z/xajnz8abn but it seems to be fixed in gcc 11 onwards (I heavily rewrote the internals of the analyzer in gcc 11). I'll add this as a regression test to the testsuite and then close this out; thanks again.
[Bug analyzer/99269] False positive -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak/-Wanalyzer-double-free with -fanalyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99269 Dominique Martinet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf@noclu ||e.notk.org --- Comment #1 from Dominique Martinet --- gcc 11.2.1 20210728 (fc34) does not produce any warning with this, so would be tempted to say it's been fixed.
