[Bug bootstrap/24695] [csl-arm-branch] Bootstrap failure with current csl-arm-branch

2005-11-10 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-10 14:16 ---
Yes. You should use binutils HEAD for csl-arm-branch. Ther
binutils-csl-arm-branch is obsolete.
We'll probably add a configure check before merging this code to mainline, but
that's not a priority for csl-arm-branch.


-- 

pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24695

[Bug bootstrap/24695] [csl-arm-branch] Bootstrap failure with current csl-arm-branch

2005-11-09 Thread bero at arklinux dot org 


--- Comment #2 from bero at arklinux dot org  2005-11-09 18:13 ---
It definitely wasn't added in binutils csl-arm-branch... Is gcc csl-arm-branch
supposed to be used with binutils head now?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24695

[Bug bootstrap/24695] [csl-arm-branch] Bootstrap failure with current csl-arm-branch

2005-11-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-06 17:05 ---
Are you sure that it is using the newest binutils?
.cpu and .fpu was added 10-08.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-10/msg00032.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24695