[Bug bootstrap/26259] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|--enable-languages=c,c++ not|toplevel directories should |working as expected,|be assocaited at the |documented when removing|toplevel with a language |gcc/ada and libada but not |being built instead of with |gnattools |a subdirectory of gcc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26259
[Bug bootstrap/26259] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc
--- Comment #34 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 16:11 --- This bug was orginally opened and not really explaining what happened until comment #2 and even then it was really You tell the doctor, it hurts when I do this and the doctor explains, do not that then. The reason for that reason was simple, this is how it works. Now if the person was not removing gcc/ada, it would be a different issue but since it is removal of this directory which caused it, it is not a matter of what is the correct behavior for documented behavior (as it is documented that config-lang.in controls the association). This is a dup of bug 26323 which explains what really wants to be changed instead of going in circuls of the current correct behavior. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26323 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26259
[Bug bootstrap/26259] toplevel directories should be assocaited at the toplevel with a language being built instead of with a subdirectory of gcc
--- Comment #35 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 16:11 --- (In reply to comment #34) This is a dup of bug 26323 which explains what really wants to be changed instead of going in circles of the current correct [documented] behavior. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26259
