[Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 06:33 --- Reopening to ... -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066
[Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 06:33 --- as a duplication of bug 27256. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27256 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066
[Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 21:27 --- /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15.92.0.2 20040927 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 1912 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section But this is a binutils bug and not a GCC one and it has been fixed too. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066
[Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5
--- Comment #2 from jeremy dot gorman at ngc dot com 2006-06-20 16:59 --- Subject: RE: cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5 Thank you, In this case, which binutil version is required? Can you refer me to the (fixed) binutil bug that's causing my problem, please? -Jeremy -Original Message- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:28 PM To: Gorman, Jeremy Subject: [Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5 --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 21:27 --- /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15.92.0.2 20040927 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 1912 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section But this is a binutils bug and not a GCC one and it has been fixed too. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066