[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 06:28 --- Use --disable-libmudflap while building the stage1 gcc for the cross compiler. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:36 --- The root issue is that I don't have a libc for the target system. And the bug is that mudflap tries to link something, and then fails because it can't find crt1.o. The idea is that you can build binutils for arm-linux, then gcc for arm-linux, and then with these compile glibc for arm-linux. That's the idea of having a platform where you have the source code for everything, right? However, only the binutils part actually works. gcc wants header files from the target platform for libgcc (!?!?), and mudflap wants object and library files, too. And glibc won't cross compile unless you already have a libc for the target platform, but that's not your fault. I'm just mentioning it to make clear what miserable shape we're in here. Felix --- You should try using crosstool which what is recommended to build a cross compiler. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-17 15:39 --- So what is the problem here? This works for me when I am building a cross compiler with a sysroot. What configure options are you using? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
--- Comment #1 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de 2006-09-15 22:14 --- Turns out you can still do make install and get a working cross compiler after that, so I concur it's normal and not critical. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
[Bug bootstrap/29102] mudflap's configure tries to link a binary and fails because I don
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 22:16 --- Well the summary cuts off at because I don. Can you write what you wantted to write in a comment? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29102
