[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2010.09.29 11:00:18 date|| CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-29 11:00:18 UTC --- I think we should we close this as WONTFIX. Or are these patches still useful?
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-29 11:13:44 UTC --- WONTFIX (--enable-intermodule has been removed and is obsoleted by --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto).
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-19 14:57 --- Created an attachment (id=15789) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15789action=view) handle libdecnumber libdecnumber/ChangeLog * configure.ac: Add option --enable-intermodule and adjust bid_OBJS. * Makefile.in: Handle onestep build. (COMPILE-m): New variable to build with --combine. * configure: Regenerate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #11 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-11 12:30 --- Created an attachment (id=15748) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15748action=view) updated patch including unwind and eh and handling of static includes untested draft for --disable-shared which contains: # XXX: FIXME: for static libs vis_hide is forced off, so why does the normal # build above have this superfluous occurence? # Play safe and provide this wrong rule and retain the mention of vis_hide # above. -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15046|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 12:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=15046)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15046action=view)
updated patch for libgcc
Fixes an error about {mul,div}{d,x,t}c3 which wants to be built for different
modes / different types;
output is
/scratch/obj.i686/gcc-4.3/i686-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortr
an.so: undefined reference to `__divdc3'
/scratch/obj.i686/gcc-4.3/i686-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so:
und
efined reference to `__divxc3'
/scratch/obj.i686/gcc-4.3/i686-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so:
und
efined reference to `__muldc3'
/scratch/obj.i686/gcc-4.3/i686-linux-gnu/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so:
und
efined reference to `__mulxc3'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
We need to compile for each of the dc, xc, tc variants separately, due to
implementation details (macros). lib2funcs_{d,x,t}c variables and corresponding
pbjects are used for this.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15016|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 13:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=15016)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15016action=view)
updated patch
tiny fix: libgcc-s-objects-onestep is only needed for enable_shared=yes.
Two other buglets fixed that were exposed by building libgcc with
--enable-intermodule, see second changelog below.
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2007-11-19 Bernhard Fischer
* configure.ac: Add option --enable-intermodule for onestep
compile.
* Makefile.in: Use onestep.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2007-11-19 Bernhard Fischer
* gbl-ctors.h: Add header guard.
* libgcc2.c: Avoid redefinition of FUNC, use FUNCU for
__floatundi?f
* config/libbid/bid64_div.c: Extern decls of
__bid_{convert_table,factors,packed_1_zeros} have to be const.
* libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_div.c: Likewise.
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15008|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #9 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 16:15 --- Stats: -rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 3853392 Jan 24 13:28 ./build_i686/gcc-4.3.0-target.IMA/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc.a 2826503 34784 8 2861295 2ba8ef (TOTALS) -rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 4569970 Jan 24 14:00 ./build_i686/gcc-4.3.0-target/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc.a 2853491 34800 310 2888601 2c1399 (TOTALS) So roughly a 15% on-disk size-saving for the static libgcc. libgcc_s.so: -rwxr-xr-x 1 1000 1000 40608 Jan 24 15:58 ./gcc-4.3.0-target.IMA.so/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc_s.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 1000 1000 187940 Jan 24 15:14 ./gcc-4.3.0-target.so/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc_s.so.1 textdata bss dec hex filename 11210 284 32 115262d06 ./gcc-4.3.0-target.IMA.so/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc_s.so.1 42013 436 336 42785a721 ./gcc-4.3.0-target.so/i686-linux-uclibc/libgcc/libgcc_s.so.1 Approximately 73% size-saving and 78% on-disk savings. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 14:41 --- Created an attachment (id=15008) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15008action=view) libgcc patch #2 Updated patch -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14190|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-20 05:05 --- Subject: Bug number PR33396 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01024.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
[Bug bootstrap/33396] add --enable-intermodule
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-26 18:53 --- (In reply to comment #4) For the fortran frontend, It seems that i have this patch (must be relatively old; undetermined status, ATM). Scratch that. Testing a working version that i will attach when it passes the check. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33396
