[Bug bootstrap/43878] Building a cross gcc fails due to a bug in the build process

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Frank from comment #2)
> On 03.02.2012 18:56, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878
> >
> > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  2012-02-03 
> > 22:56:06 UTC ---
> > The trick is to use --with-newlib as the stage1 compiler.
> >
> 
>  Thanks a lot for the answer, I had almost forgotten about this issue
> myself since I posted it a 
> while ago.
> 
>  So I guess it cannot be considered a bug ?
> 
> 
>  Frank

Since it looks like the reporter agreed this could not be considered a bug, I'm
closing this as INVALID.

[Bug bootstrap/43878] Building a cross gcc fails due to a bug in the build process

[fgn123 at freenet dot de]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878

--- Comment #2 from Frank fgn123 at freenet dot de 2012-02-29 13:02:49 UTC ---
On 03.02.2012 18:56, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878

 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinskipinskia at gcc dot gnu.org  2012-02-03 
 22:56:06 UTC ---
 The trick is to use --with-newlib as the stage1 compiler.


 Thanks a lot for the answer, I had almost forgotten about this issue
myself since I posted it a 
while ago.

 So I guess it cannot be considered a bug ?


 Frank

[Bug bootstrap/43878] Building a cross gcc fails due to a bug in the build process

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43878

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03 
22:56:06 UTC ---
The trick is to use --with-newlib as the stage1 compiler.