[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

--- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 
2010-11-15 13:40:40 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Mon Nov 15 13:40:27 2010
New Revision: 166753

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166753
Log:
PR bootstrap/45444
* config/arm/arm.c (locate_neon_builtin_icode): Initialize key.
(arm_output_asm_insn) Add ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_4.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #10 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 
2010-11-15 13:45:34 UTC ---
I've checked my patch into trunk.

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-11 
09:35:34 UTC ---
Any progress here?

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[mikpe at it dot uu.se]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2010-11-11 
10:04:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Any progress here?

The patch was posted and OK:d, but stalled apparently because I don't yet have
a copyright assignment on file.  My new employer's (Rogue Wave) legal
department is supposed to come up with an employer's disclaimer for my GCC
contributions, but they're taking forever to do so.

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-03 07:19 ---
*** Bug 45514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||laurent at guerby dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[mikpe at it dot uu dot se]

--- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se  2010-09-02 12:00 ---
Patch has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00048.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-01 08:49 ---
*** Bug 44670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-01 09:38 ---
The 'uninitialized const members' warning also affects cross builds when
using --enable-build-with-cxx, see PR44670


-- 

amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||44433
  nThis||
   GCC host triplet|armv5tel-unknown-linux- |armv5tel-unknown-linux-
   |gnueabi |gnueabi, i686-pc-linux-gnu
 GCC target triplet||*-arm-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-31 08:15 ---
confirmed. I was working on fixing this but you beat my patch to it. 
cheers
Ramana


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-31 08:15:34
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444

[Bug bootstrap/45444] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: uninitialized const member in 'neon_builtin_datum' is invalid in C++ [-Werror=c++-compat]

[mikpe at it dot uu dot se]

--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se  2010-08-29 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=21586)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21586action=view)
preliminary fixes for arm.c stage2 errors

This gets me past the arm.c stage2 errors.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444