[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #19 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-23 14:23:57 UTC --- Committed to trunk (4.7).
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-22 13:07:06 UTC --- Bootstrap completed with the patch here, regtesting in progress. Once the patch is committed and regress is happy again, please close this pr as fixed. Thanks for the fix.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-22 06:49:09 UTC --- bootstrap & regtest completed (r180257 + patch proposed); fails in struct-layout1 and vmx are gone (all plugins are now failing, but likely a different reason). thanks for the patch.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-21 19:00:59 UTC --- Patch proposed to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02017.html
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 18:48:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated > > > > /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__popcountti2’: > > /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:848:1: internal compiler error: > > in > > rs6000_adjust_cost, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:22865 > > Seems unrelated. yes, pr50825 - and fixed :-) the bootstrap (r180257) is on stage 3 (building libjava)
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-10-21 18:40:41 UTC --- >> If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be >> committed, then monitor regress on >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/ and >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-10/ . Sure. I am about to propose it. > hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated > > /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__popcountti2’: > /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:848:1: internal compiler error: in > rs6000_adjust_cost, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:22865 Seems unrelated.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 14:52:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be > committed, then monitor regress on > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/ and > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-10/ . hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__popcountti2’: /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:848:1: internal compiler error: in rs6000_adjust_cost, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:22865 ... will wind back to 241 and try again.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-21 14:25:47 UTC --- If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be committed, then monitor regress on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/ and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-10/ .
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-21 14:19:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give > it > a spin? looks good off a stage3-bubble, - libgfortran built, struct-layout-1.exp back to normal. full bootstrap incl. Ada and Java will take circa 3hrs + another 6 or so for full test-suite (i.e. results v late today or tomorrow AM).
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-21 13:35:41 UTC --- Created attachment 25568 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25568 Candidate patch Thanks to the ssh access granted by Dominique, I could looking into the Fortran related breakage. This lightly tested attached patch seems to fix it. Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give it a spin? Thanks.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-20 17:44:56 UTC --- This might be the easier one to debug: Running /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_main_tst.o compile, (internal compiler error) FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_x_tst.o compile, (internal compiler error) FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_y_tst.o compile, (internal compiler error) seems (possibly) to be failing in parsing a system header
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-20 14:29:12 UTC --- Unfortunately, as of r180241, I still have the bootstrap fail in building libgfortran (Java untested) and the ICEs in struct-layout-1.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-10-20 09:26:31 UTC --- > I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key. Thank you for giving me access to the box.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #6 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-10-20 09:15:31 UTC --- FWIW, this is maybe related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50801 that got fixed in commit r180239
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-19 15:01:47 UTC --- > Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail? I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key.
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-19 12:22:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail? unfortunately, I can't do that - company boxes here afflicted by company policy; Jack Howarth seems to be able to - I think he might have a PPC box still. Otherwise we can offer to try and answer specific questions; I've got other fails in struc-layout etc. that are bus errors in libcpp: e.g. Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x _cpp_pop_context (pfile=0x41806600) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libcpp/macro.c:2139 2139 pfile->context->next = NULL; (gdb) bt #0 _cpp_pop_context (pfile=0x41806600) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libcpp/macro.c:2139 #1 0x00937b44 in cpp_get_token_1 (pfile=0x14, location=0xbfffedac) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libcpp/macro.c:2328 #2 0x00937684 in enter_macro_context (pfile=0xbfffedac, node=0x4204e160, result=0x41809a00, location=1242616) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libcpp/macro.c:2074 #3 0x00937b44 in cpp_get_token_1 (pfile=0x41806600, location=0xbfffef08) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libcpp/macro.c:2328 #4 0x000ac398 in preprocess_file (pfile=0x41806600) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/c-family/c-ppoutput.c:177 #5 0x000aa450 in c_common_init () at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1090 #6 0x0004cb98 in c_objc_common_init () at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/c-objc-common.c:64 #7 0x006594b0 in toplev_main (argc=25, argv=0x0) at /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:1757 #8 0x2464 in start () Current language: auto; currently c++ (in case that's a hint).
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-19 10:55:28 UTC --- Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-19 09:00:43 UTC --- I have bootstrapped revision 180100 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 configured with ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,ada,lto --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/sw --enable-lto --enable-cloog-backend=isl after reverting revisions 180081 to 180086, and 180090. Unless someone come with a fix before, I'll try to restore the revisions one by one to narrow the range, but each bootstrap takes ~14 hours, so don't hold your breath!-).
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2011-10-18 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-18 18:53:08 UTC --- confirmed - bootstrap passes (ironically including Ada) without Fortran and Java. the file complained about has not been changed in months - so I guess this might be more fallout from the line number changes.
