[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Thanks for the fix. Closing.
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Mon Jan 20 11:20:24 2014 New Revision: 206802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206802&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: PR bootstrap/59496 * config/rs6000/darwin.h (ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN): Fix unused variable warning. Amend comment to reflect current functionality. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/darwin.h
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00816.html.
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Also, ppc*-darwin* isn't primary nor secondary target and the only one affected, downgrading to P4.
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > darwin should simply add a dummy use of field, like via ((field), (...)) > > well, I thought of doing that, but it seems a kludge - is the target obliged > to use the macro values? Given that all other targets use it, I'd say yes in this case.
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > darwin should simply add a dummy use of field, like via ((field), (...)) well, I thought of doing that, but it seems a kludge - is the target obliged to use the macro values?
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- darwin should simply add a dummy use of field, like via ((field), (...))
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-12-13 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- from the point of view of powerpc-darwin, this is the right fix (it doesn't need to act on FIELD in this context).
