[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:200d477d3cb1593dbaa7739c6270e0a7f6c564cf commit r9-10178-g200d477d3cb1593dbaa7739c6270e0a7f6c564cf Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon May 31 12:36:25 2021 -0400 c++: missing dtor with -fno-elide-constructors [PR100838] tf_no_cleanup only applies to the outermost TARGET_EXPR, and we already clear it for nested calls in build_over_call, but in this case both constructor calls came from convert_like, so we need to clear it in the recursive call as well. This revealed that we were adding an extra ck_rvalue in direct-initialization cases where it was wrong. PR c++/100838 PR c++/105265 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.c (convert_like_internal): Clear tf_no_cleanup when recursing. (build_user_type_conversion_1): Only add ck_rvalue if LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/init/no-elide2.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-new6.C: New test.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af commit r10-10727-g67f742536cbb60d5f8b7bba2cac0a141191e29af Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon May 31 12:36:25 2021 -0400 c++: missing dtor with -fno-elide-constructors [PR100838] tf_no_cleanup only applies to the outermost TARGET_EXPR, and we already clear it for nested calls in build_over_call, but in this case both constructor calls came from convert_like, so we need to clear it in the recursive call as well. This revealed that we were adding an extra ck_rvalue in direct-initialization cases where it was wrong. PR c++/100838 PR c++/105265 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.c (convert_like_internal): Clear tf_no_cleanup when recursing. (build_user_type_conversion_1): Only add ck_rvalue if LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/init/no-elide2.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-new6.C: New test.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248 commit r11-9985-g728f97cf0431ff342beceea4f91afa1707133248 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Wed Apr 13 20:18:33 2022 -0400 c++: temp cleanup in new [PR105265] The patch for PR100838 in GCC 11 was limited to -fno-elide-constructors for safety, but this testcase demonstrates that it's also needed without that flag. So let's switch to the GCC 12 patch for PR100838. PR c++/105265 PR c++/100838 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.c (build_user_type_conversion_1): Drop flag_elide_constructors check. (convert_like_internal): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-new6.C: New test.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:019d6d4149ee97d55ce9efe4e5e470d38130cdeb commit r12-8149-g019d6d4149ee97d55ce9efe4e5e470d38130cdeb Author: Jason Merrill Date: Wed Apr 13 12:44:54 2022 -0400 c++: add test [PR105265] This was fixed by r12-1165, but good to have a test that doesn't need -fno-elide-constructors. PR c++/105265 PR c++/100838 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-new6.C: New test.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for 11.2/12.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5830fffacd05463c20b592bb6ed20e333d7d272b commit r11-8715-g5830fffacd05463c20b592bb6ed20e333d7d272b Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon May 31 12:36:25 2021 -0400 c++: missing dtor with -fno-elide-constructors [PR100838] tf_no_cleanup only applies to the outermost TARGET_EXPR, and we already clear it for nested calls in build_over_call, but in this case both constructor calls came from convert_like, so we need to clear it in the recursive call as well. This revealed that we were adding an extra ck_rvalue in direct-initialization cases where it was wrong. For GCC 11, limit the changes to -fno-elide-constructors. PR c++/100838 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.c (convert_like_internal): Clear tf_no_cleanup when recursing. (build_user_type_conversion_1): Only add ck_rvalue if LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/init/no-elide2.C: New test.
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work||12.0 Known to fail||11.1.0
[Bug c++/100838] [11 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |-fno-elide-constructors for |-fno-elide-constructors for |C++14 missing required |C++14 missing required |destructor call since |destructor call since |r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291 |r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for 12 so far.
