[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

2022-03-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71e1db540c01a13b01fae054c92878a79252b471

commit r12-7849-g71e1db540c01a13b01fae054c92878a79252b471
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Sat Mar 26 20:10:19 2022 -0400

c++: mangling union{1} in template [PR104847]

My implementation of union non-type template arguments in r11-2016 broke
braced casts of union type, because they are still in syntactic
(undigested)
form.

PR c++/104847

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* mangle.cc (write_expression): Don't write a union designator when
undigested.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/abi/mangle-union1.C: New test.

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

2022-03-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

2022-03-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Though the nontype-class-union1.C testcase doesn't have explicit designator
syntax either.

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

2022-03-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
struct S { int i; };
union U { S k; };
template  T sink(T&&, Ts&&...);
template 
decltype(sink(U{.k={.i=1}},T())) f(T) { return U{1}; }
int main() { f(3); }

compiles fine.  I guess the question is if ce->index == NULL should be mangled
without the di production of , or we should implicitly find
the first initializable field and use that with di, i.e. if this should mangle
as
_Z1fIiEDTcl4sinktl1Udi1kilLi1EEEcvT__EEES1_
or as
_Z1fIiEDTcl4sinktl1ULi1EEcvT__EEES1_

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

2022-03-08 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Priority|P3  |P2
   Last reconfirmed||2022-03-08
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Target Milestone|--- |11.3
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek  ---
Confirmed.  Started with r11-2016-g6324c52bba490b