https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13005
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #38 from Martin Sebor ---
I don't see any spurious instructions in the unoptimized x86 assembly emitted
ny current trunk of 7.0 for the test case from comment #0 (below).
Running the program attached in comment #4 does still output the following:
*** Last forward pointer should be list header.
*** Backward: 1: is 0x602130 should be 0x602160
But given the lack of progress or any indication of activity on this bug in
over a decade, should it be closed as Won't Fix? In the meantime, lowering
priority to P3.
_ZN4Base11insertAfterEP7Derived:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
pushl %ebp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
.cfi_offset 5, -8
movl%esp, %ebp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 5
movl8(%ebp), %eax
movl(%eax), %eax
movl12(%ebp), %edx
movl%edx, 8(%eax)
nop
popl%ebp