[Bug c++/20162] new/delete performance versus std::allocator

2005-02-23 Thread sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 

--- Additional Comments From sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr  
2005-02-23 14:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=8262)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8262action=view)
Benchmark program to compare new/delete to std::allocator


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20162

[Bug c++/20162] new/delete performance versus std::allocator

2005-02-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-23 
14:11 ---
operator new/delete just calls malloc/free which is controled by libc in your 
case glibc, try with malloc/
free and then report a bug to glibc.

std::allocate is a sub allocator really.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20162