[Bug c++/21363] no compilation error for inheriting Base class with private constructor when the constructor for Derived Class is compiler generated
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-05 13:54 --- The compiler is allowed to generate syntectic methods as lazy as possible, which is upon the first actual use. Thus, this is not a bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21363
[Bug c++/21363] no compilation error for inheriting Base class with private constructor when the constructor for Derived Class is compiler generated
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05 05:12 --- (In reply to comment #2) > i don't think compiler generated constructor should have the "privilege" to > invoke constructor of parent class which is private. It does not but ICC does the same thing. Try creating an object of the class and you will see GCC errors out which is why I said it is due to the lazyness of the constructor. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21363
[Bug c++/21363] no compilation error for inheriting Base class with private constructor when the constructor for Derived Class is compiler generated
--- Additional Comments From hingwah at hingwah dot net 2005-05-05 04:58 --- i don't think compiler generated constructor should have the "privilege" to invoke constructor of parent class which is private. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21363
[Bug c++/21363] no compilation error for inheriting Base class with private constructor when the constructor for Derived Class is compiler generated
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 17:06 --- I think this is how C++ works. Or this because of the lazy createness of constructors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21363
