[Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors

2006-01-24 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
   Last reconfirmed|2006-01-25 02:41:25 |2006-01-25 03:20:53
   date||
Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] [DR|[3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392]
   |152] Reference binding and  |Reference binding and
   |explicit copy constructors  |explicit copy constructors


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950

[Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 392] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors

2006-01-24 Thread hhinnant at apple dot com 


--- Comment #13 from hhinnant at apple dot com  2006-01-25 03:24 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 | Did you read comment 3? 
 
 Yes.  Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or
 not does not matter? 

No.  My suspicion is that there is a 99.99% chance that EDG is conforming to
C++03 in this regard.  And furthermore, their behavior (which is different from
ours) is preferable to our customers.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950